Talking Footy

Topper wrote:

As I have explained, no human being can prove a negative which is what you are asking me to do. You claimed that the majority of supporters at games were expat Victorians. I challenged you on this by stating this is not true. It is up to you to prove your claim, otherwise you lose. This is your last chance.

you said I had to prove my claim
you prove yours too

otherwise F off ........ K

As I have explained, no human being can prove a negative which is what you are asking me to do. You claimed that the majority of supporters at games were expat Victorians. I challenged you on this by stating this is not true. It is up to you to prove your claim, otherwise you lose. This is your last chance.

Topper wrote:

As I have explained, no human being can prove a negative which is what you are asking me to do. You claimed that the majority of supporters at games were expat Victorians. I challenged you on this by stating this is not true. It is up to you to prove your claim, otherwise you lose. This is your last chance.

you've explained that I've made a claim I Must prove
& you've made one .. that you don't have to prove

you are a nonsensical twat ... a rambling moron ... & an utter twit

& these are your better qualities ... K

As I have explained, no human being can prove a negative which is what you are asking me to do. You claimed that the majority of supporters at games were expat Victorians. I challenged you on this by stating this is not true. It is up to you to prove your claim, otherwise you lose. This is your last chance.

Topper wrote:

As I have explained, no human being can prove a negative which is what you are asking me to do. You claimed that the majority of supporters at games were expat Victorians. I challenged you on this by stating this is not true. It is up to you to prove your claim, otherwise you lose. This is your last chance.

I challenged you to prove news ltds representationon the NRL board isn't anymore then 50%
It is up to you to prove your claim, otherwise you lose. This is your last chance

K

1,200 ******* members for the GWS trash.

LMAO.

12K as the title of this thread says.

eels fan wrote:

1,200 ******* members for the GWS trash.

In denial I see.

Beaussie wrote:

eels fan wrote:

1,200 ******* members for the GWS trash.

In denial I see.

you think denial is a river in Africa .......

http://www.gwsgiants.com.au/

1265

2012 MEMBERS AND GROWING!


1265...
behind every NRL club in Sydney

infact every NRL club there is ...............

Oh dear, you really are fucking stupid. That figure is for memberships to date since memberships were made available for 2012 last week. No doubt more than the Panthers, Eels, Bulldogs and Tigers in the NRL within just one week.

NRL clubs don't believe in memberships.

Beaussie wrote:

Oh dear, you really are ******* stupid. That figure is for memberships to date since memberships were made available for 2012 last week. No doubt more than the Panthers, Eels, Bulldogs and Tigers in the NRL within just one week.

phhtttt............. sure

1265

Topper wrote:

NRL clubs don't believe in memberships.

South Sydney are ova 13,000 already

so if NRL clubs don't believe in them
whadda make of the 1265 the midgits have ..... good one tipsy

oh oh .... hold the phone
just checked

the GWS front office was swamped by potential members yesteday
the front door was almost knocked down

almost

they had another ............. .......... 67 people sign up



meanwhile south sydneys went up in the same period by 1000................

gws,,,,

And how many of South's members are actually ticketed??? Hmm, mostly pet memberships I suspect.