Talking Footy

Terry wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 5:33 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 1:17 pm

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 1:05 pm

if this was an NRL Game, i would say..

It featured a team running last who is hopeless, but somehow won
it was played in raining conditions which showed up as a pathetic game.

you cannot say it was cause it was a Monday,
as this has been stated that Monday's rate well for the AFL

A one off Monday not on fta in Melbourne featuring 18th vs 7th. Eagles played so poorly they lost to a side predicted to go winless all season. Yikes

Ok, so I just checked. That was outta page 324 of the 'lame excuses book for failing AFL TV ratings'. And oldy but a goody. Pointless of course but worth a try!!!

NlolRL wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 1:00 pm

pussycat Mark 11 wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 12:30 pm

mmmh, That a very low PTV number but I'm sure LOL will have the reason for why it was so low.

Why do you think it's below the AFL average?

pussycat Mark 11 wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 6:28 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 1:00 pm

pussycat Mark 11 wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 12:30 pm

mmmh, That a very low PTV number but I'm sure LOL will have the reason for why it was so low.

Why do you think it's below the AFL average?

Wookie worked out the AFL average for PTV the other day , I think the number 155k meaning in isolation about 175k.


And Canterbury coming last got just under 300k two nights earlier. And by the way the match wasn't a one of like you claim, it was your third Monday night game this year r

pussycat Mark 11 wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 6:28 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 1:00 pm

pussycat Mark 11 wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 12:30 pm

mmmh, That a very low PTV number but I'm sure LOL will have the reason for why it was so low.

Why do you think it's below the AFL average?

Wookie worked out the AFL average for PTV the other day , I think the number 155k meaning in isolation about 175k.

pussycat Mark 11 wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 6:34 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue Jul 13, 2021 1:00 pm

Why do you think it's below the AFL average?

Wookie worked out the AFL average for PTV the other day , I think the number 155k meaning in isolation about 175k.


And Canterbury coming last got just under 300k two nights earlier. And by the way the match wasn't a one of like you claim, it was your third Monday night game this year r

pussycat Mark 11 wrote: Wed Jul 14, 2021 10:46 am

Because every game cant be 1st v 2nd. And it highlights just how little credibility your lame arse excuses have

NlolRL wrote: Wed Jul 14, 2021 12:32 pm

pussycat Mark 11 wrote: Wed Jul 14, 2021 10:46 am

Because every game cant be 1st v 2nd. And it highlights just how little credibility your lame arse excuses have

How so? If the ratings were below average that alone shows the game didn't have typical level if ratings

Terry wrote: Wed Jul 14, 2021 3:50 pm

NlolRL wrote: Wed Jul 14, 2021 12:32 pm

pussycat Mark 11 wrote: Wed Jul 14, 2021 10:46 am

Because every game cant be 1st v 2nd. And it highlights just how little credibility your lame arse excuses have

How so? If the ratings were below average that alone shows the game didn't have typical level if ratings

Pal, you're dead set twisting yourself into a pretzel!!!! Have you run away with the circus and become a contortionist lolololololol???????? Or have ya been reading up on the Karma Sutra???? Whatever it is you've got a position for every circumstance lololol!!!!!

Terry wrote: Wed Jul 14, 2021 3:50 pm

NlolRL wrote: Wed Jul 14, 2021 12:32 pm

pussycat Mark 11 wrote: Wed Jul 14, 2021 10:46 am

Because every game cant be 1st v 2nd. And it highlights just how little credibility your lame arse excuses have

How so? If the ratings were below average that alone shows the game didn't have typical level if ratings

Pal, you're dead set twisting yourself into a pretzel!!!! Have you run away with the circus and become a contortionist lolololololol???????? Or have ya been reading up on the Karma Sutra???? Whatever it is you've got a position for every circumstance lololol!!!!!

pussycat Mark 11 wrote: Wed Jul 14, 2021 6:14 pm

Terry wrote: Wed Jul 14, 2021 3:50 pm

NlolRL wrote: Wed Jul 14, 2021 12:32 pm

How so? If the ratings were below average that alone shows the game didn't have typical level if ratings

Pal, you're dead set twisting yourself into a pretzel!!!! Have you run away with the circus and become a contortionist lolololololol???????? Or have ya been reading up on the Karma Sutra???? Whatever it is you've got a position for every circumstance lololol!!!!!

He's run out of excuses and now he wants us to make some up for him!

Canterbury coming last, yep got 300k the other day..
which i was trying to explain nlolrl

that even a team like canterbury performing shocking managed 300k
which was helped abit by Lockdown..

which he added, lockdown is not adding to your ratings..

pussycat Mark 11 wrote: Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:18 am

Canterbury coming last, yep got 300k the other day..
which i was trying to explain nlolrl

that even a team like canterbury performing shocking managed 300k
which was helped abit by Lockdown..

which he added, lockdown is not adding to your ratings..

How do you work out that Leeroy is agreeing with you? I'd be very interested to hear.

One game you dont have to look to far. Your isolation claim is nothing but an excuse, making little or no difference - 25k at most.