www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Still struggling to count past 6?azif wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 10:02 pmso these stinking filthy oxygen thief grants have had in 13 years
about 445K members ... apparently
for in total $100K in profits ?
cardboard cut outs
frogs
cats
dead people
confirmed
well the grants are .... never for profit & very much for lossmakingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 11:53 pmStill struggling to count past 6?azif wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 10:02 pmso these stinking filthy oxygen thief grants have had in 13 years
about 445K members ... apparently
for in total $100K in profits ?
cardboard cut outs
frogs
cats
dead people
confirmed
The clubs are a not for profit organisation ******** *****
So the giants are stealing NRL fans and that has you a little rattled?
still dont know anything about a business!azif wrote: Sun Apr 20, 2025 8:04 amwell the grants are .... never for profit & very much for lossmakingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 11:53 pmStill struggling to count past 6?azif wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 10:02 pmso these stinking filthy oxygen thief grants have had in 13 years
about 445K members ... apparently
for in total $100K in profits ?
cardboard cut outs
frogs
cats
dead people
confirmed
The clubs are a not for profit organisation ******** *****
So the giants are stealing NRL fans and that has you a little rattled?
& yes mo^^ngbreath
all those NRL fans can't get enough of the grants eh
you don't know anything about .... anything you dribbling ta^^rdmakingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Sun Apr 20, 2025 9:43 pmstill dont know anything about a business!azif wrote: Sun Apr 20, 2025 8:04 amwell the grants are .... never for profit & very much for lossmakingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 11:53 pm
Still struggling to count past 6?
The clubs are a not for profit organisation ******** *****
So the giants are stealing NRL fans and that has you a little rattled?
& yes mo^^ngbreath
all those NRL fans can't get enough of the grants eh
in this case profits mean jack shit, in a not for profit organisation, the AFL turn over is far higher than the NRL and still making profits with revenue growing
That's very interesting sooks. But can you tell me what this means: "interesting fact – since 2012, GWS have spent 24.093m on Membership expense and merchandise costs…for a return of 24.201m – a profit of $107,628. However they also have a merch writeoff of 3.5m on the books in 2013….sooo they havent done spectacularly well here."
it sounds hilarious,Terry wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 10:04 amThat's very interesting sooks. But can you tell me what this means: "interesting fact – since 2012, GWS have spent 24.093m on Membership expense and merchandise costs…for a return of 24.201m – a profit of $107,628. However they also have a merch writeoff of 3.5m on the books in 2013….sooo they havent done spectacularly well here."
A spend of $24.093m for a return of $24.201m doesn't seem to be very good business. And it includes a write off of $3.5m. In your considered opinion what is happening here?? It seems a little fishy sooks.
similar cases can be said about League teams also. the only thing is seeing the AFL is running and bank rolling them and the NRL expects governments to do this, the AFL can do as it choosesleeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 12:48 pmit sounds hilarious,Terry wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 10:04 amThat's very interesting sooks. But can you tell me what this means: "interesting fact – since 2012, GWS have spent 24.093m on Membership expense and merchandise costs…for a return of 24.201m – a profit of $107,628. However they also have a merch writeoff of 3.5m on the books in 2013….sooo they havent done spectacularly well here."
A spend of $24.093m for a return of $24.201m doesn't seem to be very good business. And it includes a write off of $3.5m. In your considered opinion what is happening here?? It seems a little fishy sooks.
they almost spending as much to get support and keep support. and not gaining anything out of it.
What i find also Membership to GWS has went leaps and bounds since 2016
but the crowd average in 2016 was 12k and this year it is also 12k
Members 15k to 36k (but no increase in attendance ?
government does not bankroll Sponsorship and Membershipsmakingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 12:53 pmsimilar cases can be said about League teams also. the only thing is seeing the AFL is running and bank rolling them and the NRL expects governments to do this, the AFL can do as it choosesleeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 12:48 pmit sounds hilarious,Terry wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 10:04 am
That's very interesting sooks. But can you tell me what this means: "interesting fact – since 2012, GWS have spent 24.093m on Membership expense and merchandise costs…for a return of 24.201m – a profit of $107,628. However they also have a merch writeoff of 3.5m on the books in 2013….sooo they havent done spectacularly well here."
A spend of $24.093m for a return of $24.201m doesn't seem to be very good business. And it includes a write off of $3.5m. In your considered opinion what is happening here?? It seems a little fishy sooks.
they almost spending as much to get support and keep support. and not gaining anything out of it.
What i find also Membership to GWS has went leaps and bounds since 2016
but the crowd average in 2016 was 12k and this year it is also 12k
Members 15k to 36k (but no increase in attendance ?
management or owner of the club are responsible for marketing and operating costs, advertises pay sponsorship dollars and fans buy membershipsleeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 12:59 pmgovernment does not bankroll Sponsorship and Membershipsmakingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 12:53 pmsimilar cases can be said about League teams also. the only thing is seeing the AFL is running and bank rolling them and the NRL expects governments to do this, the AFL can do as it choosesleeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 12:48 pm
it sounds hilarious,
they almost spending as much to get support and keep support. and not gaining anything out of it.
What i find also Membership to GWS has went leaps and bounds since 2016
but the crowd average in 2016 was 12k and this year it is also 12k
Members 15k to 36k (but no increase in attendance ?
have you seen what Tasmania is doing outside of the stadium dealmakingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 1:18 pmmanagement or owner of the club are responsible for marketing and operating costs, advertises pay sponsorship dollars and fans buy membershipsleeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 12:59 pmgovernment does not bankroll Sponsorship and Membershipsmakingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 12:53 pm
similar cases can be said about League teams also. the only thing is seeing the AFL is running and bank rolling them and the NRL expects governments to do this, the AFL can do as it chooses
so in this case the AFL pays for operating costs of GWS and in the Case of the unwanted team P V landys is trying to dump in WA he wants government to pay and bank roll team
the Government has been pressing the AFL for a team for decades not the other way around. im not sure om the structure of the team, but to my understanding both AFL and Tasmanian government will fund it & most likely the AFL will take up the management sideleeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 1:31 pmhave you seen what Tasmania is doing outside of the stadium dealmakingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 1:18 pmmanagement or owner of the club are responsible for marketing and operating costs, advertises pay sponsorship dollars and fans buy membershipsleeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 12:59 pm
government does not bankroll Sponsorship and Memberships
so in this case the AFL pays for operating costs of GWS and in the Case of the unwanted team P V landys is trying to dump in WA he wants government to pay and bank roll team
and that has nothing to do what i stated in regards to sponsorships and members
GWS making nothing from it.
I've had that little discussion with FRED on here about AFL 100% should of went to SOUTHPORT SHARKSmakingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 2:20 pmthe Government has been pressing the AFL for a team for decades not the other way around. im not sure om the structure of the team, but to my understanding both AFL and Tasmanian government will fund it & most likely the AFL will take up the management sideleeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 1:31 pmhave you seen what Tasmania is doing outside of the stadium dealmakingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 1:18 pm
management or owner of the club are responsible for marketing and operating costs, advertises pay sponsorship dollars and fans buy memberships
so in this case the AFL pays for operating costs of GWS and in the Case of the unwanted team P V landys is trying to dump in WA he wants government to pay and bank roll team
and that has nothing to do what i stated in regards to sponsorships and members
GWS making nothing from it.
i doubt western Sydney councils went begging hand over fist to the AFL for a fresh start up side in the case of GWS
for what its worth the AFL should have used thr southport sharks the already established large club with large following on the GC over the GC suns
and needing of a roof. (seems way over the top)racistball is robbing Tasmania blindmakingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 2:20 pmthe Government has been pressing the AFL for a team for decades not the other way around. im not sure om the structure of the team, but to my understanding both AFL and Tasmanian government will fund it & most likely the AFL will take up the management sideleeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 1:31 pmhave you seen what Tasmania is doing outside of the stadium dealmakingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 1:18 pm
management or owner of the club are responsible for marketing and operating costs, advertises pay sponsorship dollars and fans buy memberships
so in this case the AFL pays for operating costs of GWS and in the Case of the unwanted team P V landys is trying to dump in WA he wants government to pay and bank roll team
and that has nothing to do what i stated in regards to sponsorships and members
GWS making nothing from it.
i doubt western Sydney councils went begging hand over fist to the AFL for a fresh start up side in the case of GWS
for what its worth the AFL should have used thr southport sharks the already established large club with large following on the GC over the GC suns
if you look at the AFL expansion teams like GWS and GCS the AFL owns, manages and bank rolls themleeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 2:49 pmI've had that little discussion with FRED on here about AFL 100% should of went to SOUTHPORT SHARKSmakingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 2:20 pmthe Government has been pressing the AFL for a team for decades not the other way around. im not sure om the structure of the team, but to my understanding both AFL and Tasmanian government will fund it & most likely the AFL will take up the management sideleeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 1:31 pm
have you seen what Tasmania is doing outside of the stadium deal
and that has nothing to do what i stated in regards to sponsorships and members
GWS making nothing from it.
i doubt western Sydney councils went begging hand over fist to the AFL for a fresh start up side in the case of GWS
for what its worth the AFL should have used thr southport sharks the already established large club with large following on the GC over the GC suns
had the entire setup was good to go.
and entering as the Gold Coast Sharks, would of been brilliant. Big mistake in my books.
regards to the NRL asking PERTH etc.
(upgrade of stadium and facilities ) i see that as big benefit to the city and the state
not just the NRL
ever been to MUSIC CONCERT on a rectangle stadium compared to Oval.
Rectangle shits on it any day of the week.
NRL have asked for grassroots funding in schools ?? again other sports receive this funding.. NRL is asking ?
Perth agreed to HQ for Perth.. so there is a gift to the NRL.
again Swans, GWS, LIONS have all received big funding for there HQ
besides that does not look like much else, until we see details
again, with AFL demands put forward for entry.
i dont agree with a stadium or HQ
i disagree with 23k seats at 1 billion and ballooning by the day
Well if that’s the case why do you engage?? Adds nothing to the site - rise above.makingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 6:58 pmasie from rubbish posts of nonsense and nicknames of turds, ****, racists & wanker! you have the mental capacity of a 12 yr old child that didnt finish junior school cant count past 6 and dont know the basics of not for profit organisations! lolazif wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 6:55 pmif struggling to understand a topic was a prerequisite for contributingmakingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 5:17 pm
try sitting out of a topic you struggle to understand!
btw i do enjoy some of those 12 yr old child like nick names as it puts the rest of the posts in to contact! lol
then
your post count would be
0
your illiterate twat