Page 75 of 227
Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:27 am
by pussycat
Stewie wrote:pussycat wrote:morley101 wrote:A couple of updates
NRL (2012 number's bolded)
Brisbane – 18,882 (26,216)
Canterbury-Bankstown – 14,623 (13,544)
Canberra – 7,390 (8,264)
Cronulla – 8,031 (5,126)
Gold Coast – 6,734 (6,674)
Manly – 8,124 (10,466)
Melbourne – 11,747 (14,762)
Newcastle – 15,073 (19,399)
New Zealand – 7,326 (10,938)
North Queensland – 9,846 (10,336)
Parramatta – 13,006 (11,012)
Penrith – 5,572 (5,686)
St.George Illawarra – 17,760 (19,223)
South Sydney – 22,666 (22,154)
Sydney – 11,274 (10,256)
Wests Tigers – 9,546 (10,305)
It was announced that Easts' (Sydneys) numbers were up 27% on last year!, a week or so back.
It was also found out that their cheapest ticketed membership was just under $100 cheaper than the Swans cheapest ticketed membership, which includes one less game!
nRL... cheap as chips.
and there dearest was 2.5k. about double the Swans dearest.
The Roosters had 3 packages more expensive than the Swans dearest!
Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:48 am
by Stewie
pussycat wrote:Stewie wrote:pussycat wrote:
It was also found out that their cheapest ticketed membership was just under $100 cheaper than the Swans cheapest ticketed membership, which includes one less game!
nRL... cheap as chips.
and there dearest was 2.5k. about double the Swans dearest.
The Roosters had 3 packages more expensive than the Swans dearest!
What do you expect people to buy more of? The cheapest 11 game ticket, or some corporate membership which is probably limited to 100 or so people anyway.
nRL... cheap as chips.
Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:14 am
by Raiderdave
pussycat wrote:
and there dearest was 2.5k. about double the Swans dearest.
The Roosters had 3 packages more expensive than the Swans dearest
oh lets not let facts get in the way of a spewie post full of rampant spastcity
the dickhead is an expert in not knowing shit from clay
& his ignorant .. ill informed posts are a highlight of these forums
Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:27 am
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:pussycat wrote:Stewie wrote:
and there dearest was 2.5k. about double the Swans dearest.
The Roosters had 3 packages more expensive than the Swans dearest!
What do you expect people to buy more of? The cheapest 11 game ticket, or some corporate membership which is probably limited to 100 or so people anyway.
nRL... cheap as chips.
but but
but but but
but but but but
Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 1:40 pm
by Storm2013
Stewie I think should ban yourself from this thread for being a dickhead and for providing half the storey. Then give yourself a punch in your face ..... Just because!!
Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:20 pm
by Stewie
Hey you know that $2400 Sydney Roosters membership? Guess what, it's limited to the first 50 customers only! The Swans most expensive membership costing over $1100 is not capped, so they can sell way more than 50 and end up making more money from them than the Roosters will from their 50 people only $2400 membership.
Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:58 am
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:Hey you know that $2400 Sydney Roosters membership? Guess what, it's limited to the first 50 customers only! The Swans most expensive membership costing over $1100 is not capped, so they can sell way more than 50 and end up making more money from them than the Roosters will from their 50 people only $2400 membership.
but but but
Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:48 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Hey you know that $2400 Sydney Roosters membership? Guess what, it's limited to the first 50 customers only! The Swans most expensive membership costing over $1100 is not capped, so they can sell way more than 50 and end up making more money from them than the Roosters will from their 50 people only $2400 membership.
but but but
Roosters memberships cheap as chips... expect for 50 people!
Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:40 am
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Hey you know that $2400 Sydney Roosters membership? Guess what, it's limited to the first 50 customers only! The Swans most expensive membership costing over $1100 is not capped, so they can sell way more than 50 and end up making more money from them than the Roosters will from their 50 people only $2400 membership.
but but but
Roosters memberships cheap as chips... expect for 50 people!
VFL memberships cheap
for everyone
Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:43 am
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
but but but
Roosters memberships cheap as chips... expect for 50 people!
VFL memberships cheap
for everyone
yet all but 50 are more expensive than the NRLs
Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:16 am
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
but but but
Roosters memberships cheap as chips... expect for 50 people!
VFL memberships cheap
for everyone
Swans cheapest ticketed membership is $100 more expensive than the Roosters. The Swans will double the Roosters memberships as well. Swans... racking in the $.
Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:00 am
by pookus
With the info we have here is what each member spends at each club.( membership revenue/members)
NRL
Rabbits $168 per head
Dragons $138
AFL
Pies $222
Eagles $271
Bombers $195
Carl $195
Haw $152(over 10000 4 gme memberships in Tassie)
Cant find anymore numbers for the NRL as they hide them.The 2 I got were supplied by Roy Masters in his story about the NRL fudging membership numbers.
So there it is NRL cheap as and still no love. =D> =D> =D> =D>
Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:07 am
by Brandz
7 clubs have now exceeded 2012 numbers
Update
NRL (2012 number's in brackets)
Brisbane – 19,402 (26,216)
Canterbury-Bankstown – 15,284 (13,544)
Canberra – 7,630 (8,264)
Cronulla – 8,246 (5,126)
Gold Coast – 6,955 (6,674)
Manly – 8,217 (10,466)
Melbourne – 12,093 (14,762)
Newcastle – 15,189 (19,399)
New Zealand – 8,385 (10,938)
North Queensland – 9,905 (10,336)
Parramatta – 13,575 (11,012)
Penrith – 5,776 (5,686)
St.George Illawarra – 17,912 (19,223)
South Sydney – 22,981 (22,154)
Sydney – 11,274 (10,256)
Wests Tigers – 10,301 (10,305)
Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:27 pm
by Drac
Brandz wrote:7 clubs have now exceeded 2012 numbers
Update
NRL (2012 number's in brackets)
Brisbane – 19,402 (26,216)
Canterbury-Bankstown – 15,284 (13,544)
Canberra – 7,630 (8,264)
Cronulla – 8,246 (5,126)
Gold Coast – 6,955 (6,674)
Manly – 8,217 (10,466)
Melbourne – 12,093 (14,762)
Newcastle – 15,189 (19,399)
New Zealand – 8,385 (10,938)
North Queensland – 9,905 (10,336)
Parramatta – 13,575 (11,012)
Penrith – 5,776 (5,686)
St.George Illawarra – 17,912 (19,223)
South Sydney – 22,981 (22,154)
Sydney – 11,274 (10,256)
Wests Tigers – 10,301 (10,305)
wtf is going on with the Broncos?
Re: AFL vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:43 pm
by Stewie
Drac wrote:Brandz wrote:7 clubs have now exceeded 2012 numbers
Update
NRL (2012 number's in brackets)
Brisbane – 19,402 (26,216)
Canterbury-Bankstown – 15,284 (13,544)
Canberra – 7,630 (8,264)
Cronulla – 8,246 (5,126)
Gold Coast – 6,955 (6,674)
Manly – 8,217 (10,466)
Melbourne – 12,093 (14,762)
Newcastle – 15,189 (19,399)
New Zealand – 8,385 (10,938)
North Queensland – 9,905 (10,336)
Parramatta – 13,575 (11,012)
Penrith – 5,776 (5,686)
St.George Illawarra – 17,912 (19,223)
South Sydney – 22,981 (22,154)
Sydney – 11,274 (10,256)
Wests Tigers – 10,301 (10,305)
wtf is going on with the Broncos?
They made the finals last year but bombed out first round and since their fans are used to success and them going deeper into the finals, a bad finals series is all it takes for their band wagoners to jump off. 31k was the lowest first home crowd of the year for them since 2004. Can you imagine the decline in crowds if they missed the finals in consecutive years?
