Talking Footy

pookus wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Oh Dave, if youre allowed to make assumptions about undisclosed amounts then so are we

We have a 5 year naming rights with Toyota for 200m.

Well, there we have it, AFL wins as we all expected =D> =D>

ah .... I didn't include any naming rights in my totals.. ***********

this thread is about the broadcast rights & who got the most
guess what
it wasn't vicky kicky

How can you not be quoting naming rights you bellend.They are wrapped up mysteriously with the digital rights.I wonder why they did that.NRL subterfuge.(look that up dave)

The_Wookie wrote:

1. my code of Australian football is second to none across Australia, the AFL league on the other hand, using a combination of logic and maths - I understand these are probably foreign concepts to you - is far from coming second to anyone.

it clearly is 2nd on many many fronts now & these grow by the day .. a bitter pill but one you must choke down on so as to ensure sleep deprevation doesn't set in

2. its never been about who has the most, .

..... sure it has ... sure

3. learn to use the quote function

Raiderdave wrote:

pookus wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

ah .... I didn't include any naming rights in my totals.. ***********

this thread is about the broadcast rights & who got the most
guess what
it wasn't vicky kicky

How can you not be quoting naming rights you bellend.They are wrapped up mysteriously with the digital rights.I wonder why they did that.NRL subterfuge.(look that up dave)

I didn't you wombat molestor
I took a portion of our telstra deal (180 to 200 million ) ... out
& we whopped yuz
whopped yuz good

as for why our naming rights $ value isn't made public

I guess the same could be asked of the VFL & Toyota .. ?
any theories here poohlooter ?
subterfuge too no doubt eh ?

The_Wookie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

says a supporter of the code that came 2nd

1. my code of Australian football is second to none across Australia, the AFL league on the other hand, using a combination of logic and maths - I understand these are probably foreign concepts to you - is far from coming second to anyone.
2. its never been about who has the most, its always what you do with it that counts.
3. learn to use the quote function

The_Wookie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

it clearly is 2nd on many many fronts now & these grow by the day .. a bitter pill but one you must choke down on so as to ensure sleep deprevation doesn't set in

Hmm lots of fronts? oh you must mean tv rights? wait is 1.025 bigger than 1.098 billion? I never can remember. Is the AFLs 155 million telstra deal without naming rights better or worse than the NRL 150 million WITH naming rights? Is the AFLs 23.2 million radio rights going to be beaten by the NRls 2 million radio figure? But you got us good on NZ rights though.

Thats without the obligatory references to crowds, members, non media rights revenue, playing numbers, and hell even tv viewing figures from 2012.

For you, it all hinges on the NZ deal being fucking massive.

piesman2011 wrote:

Lets play the fudge game.
NRL max according to dave
1.025
Online/naming rights 180
Kiwis 150
total 1.35 billion


AFL 1.253 + 100 million naming rights (will be redone next year)
1.353 billion
We win

eelofwest wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

Lets play the fudge game.
NRL max according to dave
1.025
Online/naming rights 180
Kiwis 150
total 1.35 billion


AFL 1.253 + 100 million naming rights (will be redone next year)
1.353 billion
We win

The funny Part in all this is that we were not meant to get close to the AFL deals a year ago Pies what happened????? The AFL back in there Box were they belong...well done commissioners.... =D> =D> .

NRL have there Mojo back after a decade of the worst Code War seen in this country.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

If RL doesn't make a go of it this time, the game deserves to die (in Aus at least).

pussycat wrote:

A lot of daft fools in this thread wipeing the egg of there face....'Will they get $700m ? $800m?' =D> =D> =D> ' Why the NRL can never get the money the AFL got' - poor pathetic morons you lot have had 15 years head start and we've all but caught you in just 6 months out of the box hey Woofie No. 2's not to bad, get used to it?

Xman wrote:

Most people, including me, said the NRL would get around 900m

yeah , no .... most singletballers including you .. said we'd get 700 mill

I was always referring to the Australian component of their deal since thats what we compare when looking at ratings, so in the end that estimate was about 20% off

BS , who cares what you were talking about , it was TV revenue from where ever it comes from , don't blame us because the VFL gets none from anywhere outside of Australia .. & anyway ... u yr still about 45% off ... so not even close

Oh and the NRL are still miles being in revenue since they earn stuff all from non media revenue. even with 200m expansion costs the AFL will be hundreds of millions ahead in 5 years time

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Most people, including me, said the NRL would get around 900m

yeah , no .... most singletballers including you .. said we'd get 700 mill

I was always referring to the Australian component of their deal since thats what we compare when looking at ratings, so in the end that estimate was about 20% off

BS , who cares what you were talking about , it was TV revenue from where ever it comes from , don't blame us because the VFL gets none from anywhere outside of Australia .. & anyway ... u yr still about 45% off ... so not even close

Oh and the NRL are still miles being in revenue since they earn stuff all from non media revenue. even with 200m expansion costs the AFL will be hundreds of millions ahead in 5 years time

as has been said numerous times , the NRL's costs are considerably less .. & when they are factored in , it actually leaves the NRL with between 100 & 125 million more in disposable income over the 5 years , then the VFL

game ova

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

yeah , no .... most singletballers including you .. said we'd get 700 mill
BS , who cares what you were talking about , it was TV revenue from where ever it comes from , don't blame us because the VFL gets none from anywhere outside of Australia .. & anyway ... u yr still about 45% off ... so not even close

as has been said numerous times , the NRL's costs are considerably less .. & when they are factored in , it actually leaves the NRL with between 100 & 125 million more in disposable income over the 5 years , then the VFL

game ova

The NRLs costs are less because theyre a far less professional, less significant league.