2017 - NRL - Rugby League TV Ratings

[AFLcrap1]

other factors? 3 origin matches per year and a few other matches . The RLWC was a separate contract. So when we factor in the pre season games and the other AFL shit. Your game is worth about half ours.

150 to100 = 1/3

I'm glad you finally can agree that our game is twice as valuable as yours.

And to arrive at an average. If you have more for a period you have to have less for a period.

The highest rating program this year - Origin1 -2. Australian Open - 3.Origin 3.

If league folks can give themselves the gold medal by claiming overall ratings are what matters, then surely AFL folks can pat themselves on the back for getting the most money...for the better part of the last 30 years.

Your game isnt twice as valuable unless you stoop to minute by minute type bullshit, which its noted you dont allow AFL fans to do with ratings.

Um go check who started the "TIME " Crap. in here
I used the minute argument yo highlight how stupid it was . .

As I've said
Crowds .AFL easily
Media deal ..AFL wins
Ratings RL wins easily .

Yet we have the same poster arguing over & over that this is not right.

[AFLcrap1]

The league loonies claim victory due to scheduling but why head to head or games played at similar times and conditions the AFL wins easily nearly every time

Please discuss the points I have repeatedly posted .
18 teams v 15 teams home ratings in AUST
Scheduling theories go out the window when your games that are overlapping or concurrent are targeted into HOME markets to maximise viewers .

Less games for RL .


This will be good

[leagueiscrap]

The league loonies claim victory due to scheduling but why head to head or games played at similar times and conditions the AFL wins easily nearly every time

Please discuss the points I have repeatedly posted .
18 teams v 15 teams home ratings in AUST
Scheduling theories go out the window when your games that are overlapping or concurrent are targeted into HOME markets to maximise viewers .

Less games for RL .


This will be good

Head to head why do AFL win easily nearly every time?

[AFLcrap1]

Oh dear .
Just answer the questions
Don't answer with another question .

[NlolRL]

Length of time? So what your now saying is that AFL will be paid slightly more than $5b for 23 hours of programing a week , over the next 5 years

While League will get almost the same amount of money for about 13 broadcasting hours each week, over the same 5 year period ?

So what your saying is your game is worth about half what ours is?

there are far more factors that effect the TV rights than just length of the game, as I mentioned in a post earlier. RL have SOO, internationals, and the most expensive TV advertising space in Australia.


This has to do with claims of 'most watched'. Well each AFL game is watched for 50% longer than an NRL game. Therefore if RL won on raw ratings by around 10%, and the AFL was underrepresented by around 50%, the AFL was easily the most watched sport on TV.

Thanks for coming

other factors? 3 origin matches per year and a few other matches . The RLWC was a separate contract. So when we factor in the pre season games and the other AFL shit. Your game is worth about half ours.

150 to100 = 1/3

I'm glad you finally can agree that our game is twice as valuable as yours.

And to arrive at an average. If you have more for a period you have to have less for a period.

The highest rating program this year - Origin1 -2. Australian Open - 3.Origin 3.

150 is 50% more than 100

Again, this has nothing to do with money per minute, it's about which sport is watched more. If our game goes for 50% more than yours, and you barely won the cumulative ratings, which are ratings over time, then we easily won the most watched sport

[NlolRL]

Um go check who started the "TIME " Crap. in here
I used the minute argument yo highlight how stupid it was . .

As I've said
Crowds .AFL easily
Media deal ..AFL wins
Ratings RL wins easily .

Yet we have the same poster arguing over & over that this is not right.

No, you win cumulative ratings when time shown isnt taken into account. We won just about every other ratings comparison

[AFLcrap1]

Lol

[pussycat]

Do you think a list of the highest rating shows takes into account time watched????

I'm not sure why this is so hard.

We had the most rating. And we had the highest ratings



And 150m game is 1/3 longer than a 100m game. A 75m game is 1/2!

[Fred]

The league loonies claim victory due to scheduling but why head to head or games played at similar times and conditions the AFL wins easily nearly every time

Please discuss the points I have repeatedly posted .
18 teams v 15 teams home ratings in AUST
Scheduling theories go out the window when your games that are overlapping or concurrent are targeted into HOME markets to maximise viewers .

Less games for RL .


This will be good

It’s 16 ... any way you want to cut it ... 16 teams shown into Australia. If you are arguing Aus tv ratings it is still 16 teams. Go ahead with all the other stuff but it just weakens your argument as looks stupid claiming 15 teams.

[NlolRL]

Do you think a list of the highest rating shows takes into account time watched????

I'm not sure why this is so hard.

We had the most rating. And we had the highest ratings



And 150m game is 1/3 longer than a 100m game. A 75m game is 1/2!

clearly cats dont know maths

if you increase 100 minutes by 50% you get 150 minutes.

As for highest rating shows, you have 2 SOO games on top, then the AFL smashes the NRL for game after game. While SOO is popular its a brief tournament that cannot be directly compared to the AFL.

[Terry]

Do you think a list of the highest rating shows takes into account time watched????

I'm not sure why this is so hard.

We had the most rating. And we had the highest ratings



And 150m game is 1/3 longer than a 100m game. A 75m game is 1/2!

clearly cats dont know maths

if you increase 100 minutes by 50% you get 150 minutes.

As for highest rating shows, you have 2 SOO games on top, then the AFL smashes the NRL for game after game. While SOO is popular its a brief tournament that cannot be directly compared to the AFL.

Nutter!!!!.jpg (56.95 KiB) Viewed 5667 times

Lololololololololololololololololololol. Pal, you're just a mug fumbling nutter!!!! Sensible companies collate ratings - not you!! They put out numbers - not you!! They calculate timing, averages, peak and other ratings - not you!!

You're mad nutter ramblings are irrelevant. The reputable companies put out numbers that say RL wins very, very easily. You spin mad theories and hocus pocus in a dim witted attempt to deflect from reality.

Move on nutter - you're village must miss you terribly lolololololololololololol.

[AFLcrap1]

The league loonies claim victory due to scheduling but why head to head or games played at similar times and conditions the AFL wins easily nearly every time

Please discuss the points I have repeatedly posted .
18 teams v 15 teams home ratings in AUST
Scheduling theories go out the window when your games that are overlapping or concurrent are targeted into HOME markets to maximise viewers .

Less games for RL .


This will be good

It’s 16 ... any way you want to cut it ... 16 teams shown into Australia. If you are arguing Aus tv ratings it is still 16 teams. Go ahead with all the other stuff but it just weakens your argument as looks stupid claiming 15 teams.

Fred
I said 15 teams HOME RATINgs .
The NZ warriors home ratings are in NZ
How hard is it to understand .
Every AFL team has home ratings counted in AUST
PERTH TEAMS Home ratings are from Aust
Same with Adelaide
In the NRL it's 15 home teams
The home team ratings for the warriors are not counted in AUSt .
Their home is NZ
Hard to understand for a fumblefan.....the overseas thing
Anyone with an IQ above link could understand that . Yet you can't

[NlolRL]

Lololololololololololololololololololol. Pal, you're just a mug fumbling nutter!!!! Sensible companies collate ratings - not you!! They put out numbers - not you!! They calculate timing, averages, peak and other ratings - not you!!

You're mad nutter ramblings are irrelevant. The reputable companies put out numbers that say RL wins very, very easily. You spin mad theories and hocus pocus in a dim witted attempt to deflect from reality.

Move on nutter - you're village must miss you terribly lolololololololololololol.

[AFLcrap1]

Terry has a point
Your ramblings are just that
The ratings are what they are .
You can't change them to suit whatever bizarro agenda you have

For example I have never seen anyone in the industry claim the AFL GF got 50% extra ratings because of going longer .
It's just some nutter theory made by you because you can't accept reality .

[Fred]

Please discuss the points I have repeatedly posted .
18 teams v 15 teams home ratings in AUST
Scheduling theories go out the window when your games that are overlapping or concurrent are targeted into HOME markets to maximise viewers .

Less games for RL .


This will be good

It’s 16 ... any way you want to cut it ... 16 teams shown into Australia. If you are arguing Aus tv ratings it is still 16 teams. Go ahead with all the other stuff but it just weakens your argument as looks stupid claiming 15 teams.

Fred
I said 15 teams HOME RATINgs .
The NZ warriors home ratings are in NZ
How hard is it to understand .
Every AFL team has home ratings counted in AUST
PERTH TEAMS Home ratings are from Aust
Same with Adelaide
In the NRL it's 15 home teams
The home team ratings for the warriors are not counted in AUSt .
Their home is NZ
Hard to understand for a fumblefan.....the overseas thing
Anyone with an IQ above link could understand that . Yet you can't

There are still 16 teams playing and watched in Australia. Trust me on this one. I know where you’re coming from but stick with what you have ...16. You don’t need to guild the Lilly here on this one.