Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

docker24 wrote:

Yet your failders haven't had a sell out in a tidy stadium since sticky, Loz and tMal. They been in Canberra for a while now and we constantly see low membership, TV views and attendance figures.

You constantly talk down GWS who are working hard in league central and starting to show for it. Worry about your failders first champ.

Oh really wanker
No sellouts eh?
26, 476 v the tigers in 2010.. all tickets gone in 36 hrs & standing room all gone 12 hours later
24, 460 v the sharks in 2012 .. all tickets gone in 72 hrs

Anything else I can help u with u know nothing ****** ?

finals I gather.

Yes &

So ?

Yr cockhead fumbler mate said no sellouts
He was wrong
Like most fumblers are about everything

Xman wrote:

if you cant sellout a 25k stadium for a final you should not be a professional club

Again
Yr dribbler singletball pal said no sellouts
No qualifications
Just a wank statement

The midgets have never .. nor will ever sellout a venue in Sydney

Lol that shows nothing. you are proud that your failders have sold out twice in a tidy stadium in 15 years And they were finals too haha. Man you're really streching. Clinging on to anything. Admit your club is shit. Such a rookie club. Poor attendance, poor TV views, poor membership and poor players.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

if you cant sellout a 25k stadium for a final you should not be a professional club

Again
Yr dribbler singletball pal said no sellouts
No qualifications
Just a wank statement

The midgets have never .. nor will ever sellout a venue in Sydney

I'm going to hold on to you for that.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

docker24 wrote:

Yet your failders haven't had a sell out in a tidy stadium since sticky, Loz and tMal. They been in Canberra for a while now and we constantly see low membership, TV views and attendance figures.

You constantly talk down GWS who are working hard in league central and starting to show for it. Worry about your failders first champ.

Oh really wanker
No sellouts eh?
26, 476 v the tigers in 2010.. all tickets gone in 36 hrs & standing room all gone 12 hours later
24, 460 v the sharks in 2012 .. all tickets gone in 72 hrs

Anything else I can help u with u know nothing ****** ?

finals I gather.

Yes &

So ?

Yr cockhead fumbler mate said no sellouts
He was wrong
Like most fumblers are about everything

well logic says he was referring to home and away games. Shame you lack any logic

Logic nothing .
If that's what he meant he should have stated it .
He was caught out talking shit .
But you defend him .
Lol

its obvious ffs

docker24 wrote:

Lol that shows nothing. you are proud that your failders have sold out twice in a tidy stadium in 15 years And they were finals too haha. Man you're really streching. Clinging on to anything. Admit your club is shit. Such a rookie club. Poor attendance, poor TV views, poor membership and poor players.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

if you cant sellout a 25k stadium for a final you should not be a professional club

Again
Yr dribbler singletball pal said no sellouts
No qualifications
Just a wank statement

The midgets have never .. nor will ever sellout a venue in Sydney

I'm going to hold on to you for that.

Oh make sure u do
Neither of us will be alive to ever have it come up

In fact thats silly of me
If the midgets are still around in 2025 it will be a fucking miracle

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

if you cant sellout a 25k stadium for a final you should not be a professional club

Again
Yr dribbler singletball pal said no sellouts
No qualifications
Just a wank statement

The midgets have never .. nor will ever sellout a venue in Sydney

Jeez, Raider! You are a source of so much fun!

Are you seriously suggesting the GIANTS will never sell out Spotless (24,000 seats)? !!!!

Blimey! You really have never had the measure of AFL, have you?

Well, all we have to do is wait until they do (which WILL happen) and you're going to look like a proper goose, won't you!

Then you will really go off your tits when the open northern section of the stadium is infilled with new stands to increase the ground capacity.

I'm almost breathless anticipating your rage!!!

BruceOfRedfernNSW wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

if you cant sellout a 25k stadium for a final you should not be a professional club

Again
Yr dribbler singletball pal said no sellouts
No qualifications
Just a wank statement

The midgets have never .. nor will ever sellout a venue in Sydney

Jeez, Raider! You are a source of so much fun!

Are you seriously suggesting the GIANTS will never sell out Spotless (24,000 seats)? !!!!

Blimey! You really have never had the measure of AFL, have you?

Well, all we have to do is wait until they do (which WILL happen) and you're going to look like a proper goose, won't you!

Then you will really go off your tits when the open northern section of the stadium is infilled with new stands to increase the ground capacity.

I'm almost breathless anticipating your rage!!!

Never
Not ever wanker

Why would they increase the capacity of their ground when they can barely fill a single stand in it :_<>

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

fair enough.

Though I do recall Fitzroy and South Melbourne a failure before relocating and becoming successful.

well I guess the AFL folk can have a team called Greater west of Sydney. (which is Western Sydney out to Penrith.
Play in Canberra.

I think anyone in world sport would go WTF how stupid is that

but to a AFL person I guess this is normal...

What GWS is doing bringing the game to a smaller region like Canberra is a very successful growth strategy, and not without precedent.

North Melbourne plays some games in Hobart.

Hawthorn takes four games each year to Launceston.

In fact, there is a push for the NRL to emulate the AFLs innovative strategy. Here is a Sydney Morning Herald article, May 12, 2015, urging the NRL to do exactly what GWS is doing.

BruceOfRedfernNSW wrote:

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

fair enough.

Though I do recall Fitzroy and South Melbourne a failure before relocating and becoming successful.

well I guess the AFL folk can have a team called Greater west of Sydney. (which is Western Sydney out to Penrith.
Play in Canberra.

I think anyone in world sport would go WTF how stupid is that

but to a AFL person I guess this is normal...

What GWS is doing bringing the game to a smaller region like Canberra is a very successful growth strategy, and not without precedent.

North Melbourne plays some games in Hobart.

Hawthorn takes four games each year to Launceston.

In fact, there is a push for the NRL to emulate the AFLs innovative strategy. Here is a Sydney Morning Herald article, May 12, 2015, urging the NRL to do exactly what GWS is doing.

Oops!! Forgot to include the link in my previous post

Here it is: http://m.smh.com.au/rugby-league/griffi ... h01bc.html

BruceOfRedfernNSW wrote:

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

fair enough.

Though I do recall Fitzroy and South Melbourne a failure before relocating and becoming successful.

well I guess the AFL folk can have a team called Greater west of Sydney. (which is Western Sydney out to Penrith.
Play in Canberra.

I think anyone in world sport would go WTF how stupid is that

but to a AFL person I guess this is normal...

What GWS is doing bringing the game to a smaller region like Canberra is a very successful growth strategy, and not without precedent.

North Melbourne plays some games in Hobart.

Hawthorn takes four games each year to Launceston.

In fact, there is a push for the NRL to emulate the AFLs innovative strategy. Here is a Sydney Morning Herald article, May 12, 2015, urging the NRL to do exactly what GWS is doing.

So
The NRL should go go .. smaller.. regions like the midgets & Vflol do eh ?

We have had teams in Canberra & the Illawarra since 1982
On the Gold Coast & Newcastle since 1988
In Nth Qld since 1995

Its the vflol copying the NRL u ****** :_<>
Not the other way around :_<>

Seriously
Wot a wanker u are

The vflol robbing govts with lies & falsehoods should be a source of embarrasment .. not a model to follow

Its quite disgusting

BruceOfRedfernNSW wrote:

BruceOfRedfernNSW wrote:

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

fair enough.

Though I do recall Fitzroy and South Melbourne a failure before relocating and becoming successful.

well I guess the AFL folk can have a team called Greater west of Sydney. (which is Western Sydney out to Penrith.
Play in Canberra.

I think anyone in world sport would go WTF how stupid is that

but to a AFL person I guess this is normal...

What GWS is doing bringing the game to a smaller region like Canberra is a very successful growth strategy, and not without precedent.

North Melbourne plays some games in Hobart.

Hawthorn takes four games each year to Launceston.

In fact, there is a push for the NRL to emulate the AFLs innovative strategy. Here is a Sydney Morning Herald article, May 12, 2015, urging the NRL to do exactly what GWS is doing.

Oops!! Forgot to include the link in my previous post

Here it is: http://m.smh.com.au/rugby-league/griffi ... h01bc.html

I had a Read,
Its a great idea as it states for members extra awareness / cash etc.

but I just think, you are ripping off the fans.
No Competition in the world does it.

The odd game here and there is fine, but taking away 4 home games out 12 suxs.

Why the System may work for the NRL too, I am just not a fan.

Griffith is wrong.
the NRL needs to Expand. it can do it it has the funds / the players
and it will do them good.

one team in Brisbane for 2 million and growing (hello)
NZ one team (where players are breeding like Rabbits
Perth ( when games are played there, are well received ( strong Potential)

I'm not sure the NRL can expand, Leeroy.

I'm going to crunch some numbers here. I' m not an expert on this (Wookie knows more about this than me), but I'll have a crack and do my best.

The NRL receives a cash inflow of $925m over 5 years. That's annual income amounting to $185m per year.

They dispense $7.5m per year to each club. That' an annual outgoing of $120m.

Balance remaining each year, $65m.

That $65m is really stretched supporting the very weak clubs: Titans, Knights; and Wests and StGeorge (I think).

It costs about $20m per year to start and properly resource a new football club.

Now we are beginning to get a ballpark idea of the financial restraints inhibited the NRL's expansion plans.

I will humbly stand corrected if other posters can produce a better Income & Expense Statement than my effort.