Talking Footy

There a lot of people that dislike the Broncos..
but the problem is the people that do, support another team
but im sure this will change as they live there and the new team becomes the 2nd team to support..

But yes I could only see par 25k crowds for the new team.. but could be higher.
every week a game at suncorp is a MUST

More Worrying is the Gold Coast Titans... But I will put it down too that just keep losing and abit of comp from the AFL.

Foolproof wrote:

Two games a year does not make an all round success. The new Brisbane team has to draw outside of those two games. Remember that the Broncos have the highest average attendance of any NRL club. It will drop with the new club - if Brisbane gets behind it. Are there many Broncos haters in Brisbane? I'm not sure there are. It's a concern.

I agree with regards to Perth.

Bull, the year the se qld crushers came in, they averaged over 20k, the Broncos were still averaging around 38k.

Bad example because the Crushers were created on the back of the Super League and we all know what a disaster that was.

The Crushers you know nothing fucker were put into the competition before the Super League war, they came in at the same time as the Western Reds from Perth, North Qld Cowboys from Townsville, the Auckland Warriors from New Zealand and including themselves the South East QLD Crushers.

21,029 was what the Crushers averaged in their first year.

35,902 was the average for the brisbane Broncos at the same time.

http://afltables.com/rl/crowds/1995.html

I wish you would stop talking about stuff you have no fucking idea about.

1995 was when the war started. Try again.

Are you for real in the head?

The War started in 1995, the years leading up to 1995 when these teams came in they were chosen out of a few areas you dopey idiot to have a team in the 1995 season, they had nothing to do with Murdoch starting another RL comp, he went after them, some went over some stayed with the ARL.

You continue to argue shit that just doesn't make sense, if you don't know, shut your bloody mouth instead of trying to tell everyone how it was when it bloody well wasn't, fraud.

The_Wookie wrote:

Foolproof wrote:

1995 was when the war started. Try again.

Yes but if we're going to play that technicality, then the Crushers began in November 1992 - with the intent to introduce them in 1995 anyway. This was before the Superleague War and the News Ltd Superleague had nothing to do with them being introduced as it wasnt even a concept until May 1994.

The fella is an idiot, he has no idea.

Foolproof wrote:

1995 was when the war started. Try again.

yes fuckwit

AFTER .. the crushers were started

seriously
you know nothing


about everything

Did it occur to you to think that the formation of the Crushers fast tracked the war? Did you?

No of course you didn't. Go back to school, little boy, and get a fresh education.

Foolproof wrote:

Did it occur to you to think that the formation of the Crushers fast tracked the war? Did you?

The_Wookie wrote:

Be like claiming World War 2 started with the Treaty of Versailles. While it may have been an underlying and remote cause, it wasnt part of the war.

Quick refresher. How did it all start? Attempting to rationalise the Sydney clubs. Why? To make room for clubs like the Crushers.

So don't compare the Treaty that ended WW1 in 1919 linking something that blew up 20 years later - which is virtually non existent - to something that is very relevant.

Oh my .

Foolproof wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

Be like claiming World War 2 started with the Treaty of Versailles. While it may have been an underlying and remote cause, it wasnt part of the war.

Quick refresher. How did it all start? Attempting to rationalise the Sydney clubs. Why? To make room for clubs like the Crushers.

So don't compare the Treaty that ended WW1 in 1919 linking something that blew up 20 years later - which is virtually non existent - to something that is very relevant.

:_<>