Talking Footy

post_hoc wrote:

Happy for you to state your opinion. You ok if I ignore it?

Well you ignore everyone elses so why stop now you lying wanker

Raiderdave, don't you have a toilet you need to get to, or you going to piss yourself again?

Lol you ****** .
Off topic again & using some bullshit story made up by fumblers .

You have nothing ,so resort to the usual gibberish .

Can you show me where there is any proof of RD doing what you claim .

Or do you have a piss fetish like some of the Aflol sickos on here .

There are sites out there that cater for the more extreme fetishes ,please go to one .
This is a sport forum .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Why is porky getting upset with us?
We are not the BBL ,that has smashed his irrelevant sport .
It's not our fault that sokka is just not as big as you seat jumpers make out .
So calm down porky ,it's no use taking your frustrations out on us ,not when there's plenty of intact seats around.

I didn't realise that one needed evidence to throw accusations around. You don't seem to require it.

post_hoc wrote:

Happy for you to state your opinion. You ok if I ignore it?

Up to you of course, but it does make you look like you support domestic violence against women if you do. Just saying.

post_hoc wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Why is porky getting upset with us?
We are not the BBL ,that has smashed his irrelevant sport .
It's not our fault that sokka is just not as big as you seat jumpers make out .
So calm down porky ,it's no use taking your frustrations out on us ,not when there's plenty of intact seats around.

I didn't realise that one needed evidence to throw accusations around. You don't seem to require it.

Pot meet ettle .
Cough. RD Urine cough cough. Bladder probs. cough cough ..piss your pants cough cough .

Fucking hypocrite .

The_Wookie wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Happy for you to state your opinion. You ok if I ignore it?

Domestic violence isnt funny. And you fucking well better have proof before you accuse someone of that shit.
This is your final warning.

Does everyone require proof on criminal activities or is it only some? Just want a level playing field sir

AFLcrap1 wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Why is porky getting upset with us?
We are not the BBL ,that has smashed his irrelevant sport .
It's not our fault that sokka is just not as big as you seat jumpers make out .
So calm down porky ,it's no use taking your frustrations out on us ,not when there's plenty of intact seats around.

I didn't realise that one needed evidence to throw accusations around. You don't seem to require it.

Pot meet ettle .
Cough. RD Urine cough cough. Bladder probs. cough cough ..piss your pants cough cough .

Fucking hypocrite .

This is where you would jump in and highlight the typo, but what does that show

Frequently, but not surprised you are blind to it.

So I ask again are all criminal accusations being moderated?

I am would like some clarification on that issue.

Nothing, I find all violence abhorrent. But it appears that throwing accusations against people is fine on here, so why draw the line on that one?

Violence or anti-social behaviour is wrong, why is that hard for you to understand?

By the way, can you please highlight where I claimed domestic violence was funny?

If you can't I expect you to make no further claims in that area.

Fair dinkum post_hoc , you are a fuckwit.

Thanks parra, your contribution adds such gravitas

Then I'll contribute by telling you I said the comment was uncalled for and you ignored that advice. Your choice as you said yourself - and now look what's happened. You rightly got into trouble with the moderator.

If you're so worried about criminal accusations, don't make any yourself to start with. Two wrongs don't make a right.

Yep you are right, let's see how that goes