Talking Footy

LOL, love the little cropped photo, actual marketing survey put the figure at 56% have an interest and 38% watch it on TV

http://www.ciafrica.com/oindex/index.ph ... i&Itemid=1

So once again, KE has his vivid imagination destroyed with facts.

So looks like you need to change to goalposts again.

So far

Flares are only found at soccer games

I post pictures of flares at Rugby League games

Quick move the goal posts

women don't watch football

I provide evidence through fan numbers as well as marketing surveys.

So where will the goal posts be shift now by KE.

KE you really have a vivid imagination

Mou? Change goalposts? Lordy what hypocritical nonsense. You just posted market research from Africa which is about as relevant as a fatagram at a preschool Xmas party. For fuck sake, we are talking about those who attend games yA clown, not the ambiguously framed 'those who have an interest' garbage you desperately searched Google for

Ol porkchop! He's gone and dunked his head in the dunny again folks!

As for the images I produced, they ain't cropped at all yA tosser. Just search arsenal soccer fans on images and play the 'where's the female' game folks! It's a really hard game and you can play it for any club sooker team in the world!

More data, got to love facts, now remember for those following along at home KE and his imagination has said Football has a crowd problem with females being scared and/or not wanting to watch football.

Now I have already blown him out of the water with international data and now for some domestic.

According to my great friends at the ABS there is about a 1% difference (now remember the margin of error on this is bigger than 1%) there is a 1% difference between the ratio of males to females that attend football matches than attend Rugby League Matches.

1 %, so well inside the margin of error, statistically insignificant difference, yet according to KE he thinks women don't watch football.

See boys and girls that is why you stay in school and get an education, because then you too can show up people like KE for being creative with facts LOL

Where's ur link porky?

where are yours?

besides photo's

http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats ... 009-10.pdf

so once again KE has been put into his place with a little research.

Can you know stop making things up KE, it is embarrassing to you, your family and your code.

Porky porky porky...porky... Porky porky...porky porky

Where on earth does it say 1% difference in the link provided!???

You've just provided all and sundry a link to ur lie

Keep up the good work bro!

Do the maths you fucking tool

No, now repeat after me.

Sooker has a mammoth hooly hooligan problem and tha babes don't appreciate the sport.

Comon, 'chop' 'chop' now get it? I said chop chop

KE, shown up to be a fraud, desperately trying to cover for that fact by refusing to accept the facts I posted.

I posted the link, I posted the facts. Accept it, don't accept it, your choice, but clearly you have no credibility.

1% difference between male to female attendance at Rugby League and Football matches.

Yeah all the violence is the hard chicks that rock up to the various games.

37 in the hundred at the sooker are women? Pfffft, numbers shmumbers folks, Google any crowd sooker pic and see if you can ever find more than 10 in the hundred. Seeing is believing folks, seeing is believing. I've been to the sooker in Amsterdam and the ratio was more like 2%, no jokes here folks, no jokes.

I'd be wondering very seriously about what the 'selected events' the abs are referring to. Women's sooker is better than the men's sooker as they don't cry for their mamas every time someone taps them on the shoukder with their pinky. I'd be betting the abs has selected a bundle of women's matches in their stats. The ambiguity here is a real issue and until it is sorted out I will remain critical and believe what I've seen with mine own eyes.



I'd be shaking in ur boots right now porkchop cos I'm bettin you've been to enough men's pro games to know there ain't 37 women to the hundred

The_Wookie wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

More data, got to love facts, now remember for those following along at home KE and his imagination has said Football has a crowd problem with females being scared and/or not wanting to watch football.

Now I have already blown him out of the water with international data and now for some domestic.

According to my great friends at the ABS there is about a 1% difference (now remember the margin of error on this is bigger than 1%) there is a 1% difference between the ratio of males to females that attend football matches than attend Rugby League Matches.

1 %, so well inside the margin of error, statistically insignificant difference, yet according to KE he thinks women don't watch football.

See boys and girls that is why you stay in school and get an education, because then you too can show up people like KE for being creative with facts LOL

Im quite puzzled as to why you didnt just refer to this table

Clearly because I like to do things the hard way lol, I didn't see that one, but thanks would have made my day easier. In my defence I was looking at numbers at work so I was kind of in that frame. But thanks Wookie for illustrating my point better.

King-Eliagh wrote:

I'd be wondering very seriously about what the 'selected events' the abs are referring to. Women's sooker is better than the men's sooker as they don't cry for their mamas every time someone taps them on the shoukder with their pinky. I'd be betting the abs has selected a bundle of women's matches in their stats. The ambiguity here is a real issue and until it is sorted out I will remain critical and believe what I've seen with mine own eyes.



I'd be shaking in ur boots right now porkchop cos I'm bettin you've been to enough men's pro games to know there ain't 37 women to the hundred

There you go boys and girls, when shown the facts KE throws his toys out of his cot and cries but but but the numbers lie.

Sorry KE you no credibility left.