Talking Footy

Posted: **Sat Feb 01, 2014 6:39 pm**

Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Phelpsy wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Whenever the Sydney Swans membership tally is mentioned most nRL fans led by Raiderdave will respond with something along the lines of "most of their members are based outside of NSW" or Raiderdave's classic "only 15,000 reside in NSW". But now with official evidence, we can prove this to be incorrect.

Currently out of the Swans total membership tally of 27,600, approximately 22,000 are based in New South Wales. Swannies... Sydney loves ya!

Oh come on Raiderdave man... don't tear up . The majority of us have all known the Swans have been the biggest sports team in NSW for years.

Twitter link; https://twitter.com/SwansSupport/status ... 9984971778

FYI, Sydney Swans Support is the Swans' official membership Twitter account. It appears on the membership section of their website. http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/

ah Xman

regarding your lies in the thread you just locked under instruction .... this is the cockhead that bumped that thread
not me .... as you indicated in a pathetic attempt to explain why it wasn't locked earlier

as for this tool & this post
go to the locked thread to see how I made him look like a twat....... again !!
You claime 33% yet is was 20%
& you claimed I bumped the thread as an excuse for not locking in it ..... & even after lecturing everyone on personal attacks .... posting in it yourself
today ..again showing us all .. you're nothing but a biased fumbling *****

the 21% figure given last year by the Swines..............was in January
by June it was 33% like I said

& that won't change in 2014
Hmmmm, so 27600 in January, with 5600 Vic's. The swans finished with 36000, so for 33% they would need 12k Vic members. An extra 6400 Vic members and only 2000 Syndey members ..... :_<>

well that's if we're to believe the Swines in the first place
which of course

we wouldn't ... would we

33%
end of

Posted: **Sat Feb 01, 2014 6:41 pm**

You wouldn't - and that means absolutely nothing!

Posted: **Sat Feb 01, 2014 6:42 pm**

NRLCrap1 wrote:

If rugby league was the king of Canberra

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
its been proven it is 100 times fuckhead

100 times

Posted: **Sat Feb 01, 2014 6:44 pm**

NRLCrap1 wrote:
You wouldn't - and that means absolutely nothing!

no one does except if they're brain washed singlet wearing fuckwits ...

33%
end of

Posted: **Sat Feb 01, 2014 7:06 pm**

Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Phelpsy wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Whenever the Sydney Swans membership tally is mentioned most nRL fans led by Raiderdave will respond with something along the lines of "most of their members are based outside of NSW" or Raiderdave's classic "only 15,000 reside in NSW". But now with official evidence, we can prove this to be incorrect.

Currently out of the Swans total membership tally of 27,600, approximately 22,000 are based in New South Wales. Swannies... Sydney loves ya!

Oh come on Raiderdave man... don't tear up . The majority of us have all known the Swans have been the biggest sports team in NSW for years.

Twitter link; https://twitter.com/SwansSupport/status ... 9984971778

FYI, Sydney Swans Support is the Swans' official membership Twitter account. It appears on the membership section of their website. http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/

ah Xman

regarding your lies in the thread you just locked under instruction .... this is the cockhead that bumped that thread
not me .... as you indicated in a pathetic attempt to explain why it wasn't locked earlier

as for this tool & this post
go to the locked thread to see how I made him look like a twat....... again !!
You claime 33% yet is was 20%
& you claimed I bumped the thread as an excuse for not locking in it ..... & even after lecturing everyone on personal attacks .... posting in it yourself
today ..again showing us all .. you're nothing but a biased fumbling *****

the 21% figure given last year by the Swines..............was in January
by June it was 33% like I said

& that won't change in 2014
Hmmmm, so 27600 in January, with 5600 Vic's. The swans finished with 36000, so for 33% they would need 12k Vic members. An extra 6400 Vic members and only 2000 Syndey members ..... :_<>

well that's if we're to believe the Swines in the first place
which of course

we wouldn't ... would we

33%
end of

Classic Raiderdave. When you've been proven wrong you simply claim it's all lies...

Any evidence to back your claim or counter the evidence I've shown? ANY??

Posted: **Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:04 am**

Raiderdave wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:

If rugby league was the king of Canberra

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
its been proven it is 100 times fuckhead

100 times

I proved that it's NOT! See my signature, goose!

And it's only 33 percent in your fantasy world. In the real world it's 20 percent.

Live with it, Dave, because it's the truth.

Posted: **Sun Feb 02, 2014 10:21 am**

NRLCrap1 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:

If rugby league was the king of Canberra

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
its been proven it is 100 times fuckhead

100 times
I proved that it's NOT! See my signature,

.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

you couldn't prove the existence of water in Sydney harbour you blithering fuckwit

Posted: **Sun Feb 02, 2014 10:24 am**

Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Phelpsy wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Whenever the Sydney Swans membership tally is mentioned most nRL fans led by Raiderdave will respond with something along the lines of "most of their members are based outside of NSW" or Raiderdave's classic "only 15,000 reside in NSW". But now with official evidence, we can prove this to be incorrect.

Currently out of the Swans total membership tally of 27,600, approximately 22,000 are based in New South Wales. Swannies... Sydney loves ya!

Oh come on Raiderdave man... don't tear up . The majority of us have all known the Swans have been the biggest sports team in NSW for years.

Twitter link; https://twitter.com/SwansSupport/status ... 9984971778

FYI, Sydney Swans Support is the Swans' official membership Twitter account. It appears on the membership section of their website. http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/

ah Xman

regarding your lies in the thread you just locked under instruction .... this is the cockhead that bumped that thread
not me .... as you indicated in a pathetic attempt to explain why it wasn't locked earlier

as for this tool & this post
go to the locked thread to see how I made him look like a twat....... again !!
You claime 33% yet is was 20%
& you claimed I bumped the thread as an excuse for not locking in it ..... & even after lecturing everyone on personal attacks .... posting in it yourself
today ..again showing us all .. you're nothing but a biased fumbling *****

the 21% figure given last year by the Swines..............was in January
by June it was 33% like I said

& that won't change in 2014
Hmmmm, so 27600 in January, with 5600 Vic's. The swans finished with 36000, so for 33% they would need 12k Vic members. An extra 6400 Vic members and only 2000 Syndey members ..... :_<>

well that's if we're to believe the Swines in the first place
which of course

we wouldn't ... would we

33%
end of

Any evidence to back your claim or counter the evidence

evidence ?

>

this is talking footy .... not a reputable site dickhead
thanks to your pathetic moderating ..... in this 2 bit circus
you can say what you fuckin well like & its instantly a fact

Posted: **Sun Feb 02, 2014 1:41 pm**

Thought you had none. Just needed you to confirm it... :<>

Posted: **Sun Feb 02, 2014 1:54 pm**

Well if they manage to give away 40k in memberships, they'll have more members than people from NSW watching the pile of shit on TV each week.

Does that make anyone else really laugh, I know I am.

What a heap of bloody bullshit propaganda, one day the AFL and its fans are going to wake up and realise the sand castle they built, was just that.

Thick morons.

Posted: **Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:43 pm**

Raiderdave wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:

If rugby league was the king of Canberra

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
its been proven it is 100 times fuckhead

100 times
I proved that it's NOT! See my signature,

.
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

you couldn't prove the existence of water in Sydney harbour you blithering fuckwit

Hello, Canberra Hospital? Dave's going off the deep end again. He thinks there isn't any water in Sydney Harbour.

Posted: **Wed Feb 05, 2014 1:41 pm**

Soooooo, how are the swines memberships going, reach their Sydney TV ratings yet, or did they pass them when they hit 20k?

Posted: **Wed Feb 05, 2014 3:39 pm**

What was,pay ratings for Sydney? I dont think they give them

Posted: **Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:35 pm**

Not bloody much seeing as hardly anyone watches them on FTA TV let alone Pay TV going up against Super Saturday Rugby League.

Posted: **Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:25 pm**

Phelpsy wrote:
What was,pay ratings for Sydney? I dont think they give them

again... & pay attention this time fuckwit

pay figures are almost always a third of the FTA figure in any given market
40K on FTA for the Swines in Sydney
13K for pay in the same market

got it

good !!

Talking Footy

40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014