Talking Footy

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

The average is still higher than the NRL, Dave! 17,485.

NRL average for 2013? 16,643.

ahhhh
I'll type slow for our resident *****

first 20 games of NRL in 2013 averaged 17,881
first 20 of the A League ... 17,485

got it dribbler ?

You're the resident ***** if you think that comparing two rounds (NRL) to four rounds (A-League) works like you want it to! Back to the drawing board with you, Dunce!

so you think comparing 4 rounds to an entire season is far fairer

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
our resident cockhead strikes again

at the moment,

the moment is
the first 20 games for the A League

& at the first 20 games for the NRL
we'd attracted 8000 more spectators

&
over 10 Million more TV veiwers


& that's all she wrote dipshit

adamj1300 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Back to TV ratings for RD if all fails bring out 1 factor and say they win - pathetic

our media rights say hello shithead

there haven't been figured released yet for the 2013 season,
Foxtel & 7 have both said they have had record ratings
& now as for the NRL?

I said
our media rights deal you ***** fuckwit :_<> :_<>

NRL 1.3 Billion for 16 hrs a week
VFL 1.253 Billion for 27 hrs a week

more money
less hrs >

how the fuck did we manage that

RL the most valuable sport in the nation & ... the most watched
134 Million to the fumbles & bumbles 123 Million ( really about 110 million when you take out their fudged pay ratings )

the AFL owns the NRL in everything except 2 things

:_<> :_<> :_<>
well at least you now admit 2............ of course its a lot more then this
but even this bumbling Victorian abortions most ******** fans like you
are seeing the light .... & the might of the NRL these days

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Back to TV ratings for RD if all fails bring out 1 factor and say they win - pathetic

our media rights say hello shithead

there haven't been figured released yet for the 2013 season,
Foxtel & 7 have both said they have had record ratings
& now as for the NRL?

I said
our media rights deal you ***** fuckwit :_<> :_<>

NRL 1.3 Billion for 16 hrs a week
VFL 1.253 Billion for 27 hrs a week

more money
less hrs >

how the fuck did we manage that

RL the most valuable sport in the nation & ... the most watched
134 Million to the fumbles & bumbles 123 Million ( really about 110 million when you take out their fudged pay ratings )

the AFL owns the NRL in everything except 2 things

:_<> :_<> :_<>
well at least you now admit 2............ of course its a lot more then this
but even this bumbling Victorian abortions most ******** fans like you
are seeing the light .... & the might of the NRL these days

that only shows how demented you are.
the NRL's numbers declining
the AFL's gowing
NRL shrinking

Rl has soo ... That's really the only thing they have that out does AFL in this country. Media rights, ratings, sponsorship, revenue. Doesn't matter what figures Dave makes up or strangely interprets (why you guys contribute to argue with him around his imaginary figures is beyond me), facts are facts .... And yes, we now Dave in your world you have different "facts" ... But in the real world AFL dominates.

Phelpsy wrote:

Rl has soo ... That's really the only thing they have that out does AFL in this country. Media rights, ratings, sponsorship, revenue. Doesn't matter what figures Dave makes up or strangely interprets (why you guys contribute to argue with him around his imaginary figures is beyond me), facts are facts .... And yes, we now Dave in your world you have different "facts" ... But in the real world AFL dominates.

Agreed Phelpsy - unfortunately most RL posters on this site don't examine facts - so they will believe whatever RD says because it's what they want to believe!

Swans4ever wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Rl has soo ... That's really the only thing they have that out does AFL in this country. Media rights, ratings, sponsorship, revenue. Doesn't matter what figures Dave makes up or strangely interprets (why you guys contribute to argue with him around his imaginary figures is beyond me), facts are facts .... And yes, we now Dave in your world you have different "facts" ... But in the real world AFL dominates.

Agreed Phelpsy - unfortunately most RL posters on this site don't examine facts - so they will believe whatever RD says because it's what they want to believe!

thats because half the username's are raider dave's

Phelpsy wrote:

Rl has soo ... .

again for this fuckwit :_<> :_<>

RL... 1.3 Billion for 16 hrs a week from March to Oct... for 5 years
fumble bumble ball ..... 1.253 Billion for 27 hrs a week from march to oct .. for 5 years

broadcasters & the businesses that advertise with them clearly indicating who they see as the code with value & a future in this country wouldn't you say twat

enjoy your rating as numb 2

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

The average is still higher than the NRL, Dave! 17,485.

NRL average for 2013? 16,643.

ahhhh
I'll type slow for our resident *****

first 20 games of NRL in 2013 averaged 17,881
first 20 of the A League ... 17,485

got it dribbler ?

You're the resident ***** if you think that comparing two rounds (NRL) to four rounds (A-League) works like you want it to! Back to the drawing board with you, Dunce!

so you think comparing 4 rounds to an entire season is far fairer

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
our resident cockhead strikes again

at the moment,

the moment is
the first 20 games for the A League

& at the first 20 games for the NRL
we'd attracted 8000 more spectators

&
over 10 Million more TV veiwers


& that's all she wrote dipshit

No that's not all she wrote you fricking goose! Since when was it kosher to compare competitions with different numbers of games and clubs to a round huh? Go back to that when both comps have the same number of clubs. Until then, go take a running jump with your false maths!

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Rl has soo ... .

again for this fuckwit :_<> :_<>

RL... 1.3 Billion for 16 hrs a week from March to Oct... for 5 years
fumble bumble ball ..... 1.253 Billion for 27 hrs a week from march to oct .. for 5 years

broadcasters & the businesses that advertise with them clearly indicating who they see as the code with value & a future in this country wouldn't you say twat

enjoy your rating as numb 2

adamj1300 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Rl has soo ... .

again for this fuckwit :_<> :_<>

RL... 1.3 Billion for 16 hrs a week from March to Oct... for 5 years
fumble bumble ball ..... 1.253 Billion for 27 hrs a week from march to oct .. for 5 years

broadcasters & the businesses that advertise with them clearly indicating who they see as the code with value & a future in this country wouldn't you say twat

enjoy your rating as numb 2

you keep posting that, and every time it's wrong. No SOO, no international fixtures, means it isn't complete. Rep games indicate interest in RL. As does RLWC which is doing amazingly in the wales, ireland, england and france.

pHyR3 wrote:

you keep posting that, and every time it's wrong. No SOO, no international fixtures, means it isn't complete. Rep games indicate interest in RL. As does RLWC which is doing amazingly in the wales, ireland, england and france.

Derpball is also doing well in famous international suburbs like Collingwood,Carlton & Hawksthorn.

And Wellington!!

WE DON'T NEED THOSE FIXTURES!! Fyiar, those that rely on rep games are on a losing streak for their game. GGF

NRLCrap1 wrote:

And Wellington!!

WE DON'T NEED THOSE FIXTURES!! Fyiar, those that rely on rep games are on a losing streak for their game. GGF

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
What is the name of the wellington Fumble team.

Besides the obvious issues you have with RD your jealousy about the state of international derpball is a delight to watch,
You go into a frenzy when anyone states how insignificant it is .
Entertaining for us.One step closer to a padded room for you.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

And Wellington!!

WE DON'T NEED THOSE FIXTURES!! Fyiar, those that rely on rep games are on a losing streak for their game. GGF

why do rep games indicate a losing streak? RU has international events, the olympics is probably the biggest sporting event around and it's international, same with the FIFA world cup. your point is so invalid i dunno why i bother refuting it.

and yea, i know the EPL and euro leagues are big, but they still supplement it with a massive international event in FIFA. Simiarly, NRL is popular in australia (not as big as EPL or soccer obviously) and the RLWC and other rep games supplement that.

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Rl has soo ... .

again for this fuckwit :_<> :_<>

RL... 1.3 Billion for 16 hrs a week from March to Oct... for 5 years
fumble bumble ball ..... 1.253 Billion for 27 hrs a week from march to oct .. for 5 years

broadcasters & the businesses that advertise with them clearly indicating who they see as the code with value & a future in this country wouldn't you say twat

enjoy your rating as numb 2

Enjoy being 2nd code in Australia soon to be replaced by soccer