Talking Footy

No you haven't. It's not public!

Striker wrote:

No you haven't. It's not public!

I linked the report! The private one just names names

And has to give other details as well!

Striker wrote:

And has to give other details as well!

So, prescription drugs haven't been mentioned by the ACC in their presser, in the media, by the AFL, by the NRL, by the media, by anyone...not even in their public report.

But the ACC are targetting prescription drugs...

You don't know that they aren't! It could have been in the sections not released, with the names! Come on, ADMIT IT!

Striker wrote:

You don't know that they aren't! It could have been in the sections not released, with the names! Come on, ADMIT IT!

So your entire story has not a shred of proof.....

Yours has no proof either. That's my point. YOU DON'T KNOW!! And neither do I!

Striker wrote:

Yours has no proof either. That's my point. YOU DON'T KNOW!! And neither do I!

No proof...I explained how the words prescription drugs have not even been uttered, not once, at all, in this entire massive saga... nor is included in their public report, nothing.

It doesn't need to be. The WHOLE report has NOT been released! Do you know what's in the part that hasn't been released? NO! What part of this don't you understand?

Striker wrote:

It doesn't need to be. The WHOLE report has NOT been released! Do you know what's in the part that hasn't been released? NO! What part of this don't you understand?

I don't need to read the final report. The clubs have, as have the ACC, and not one mention of prescription drugs. I can only remember one or two stories about their use in australian sport ever.

Gee you are a gullible moron aren't you?