Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

So if no such agreement was in place, would you care if the nRL GF was shown on Gem nationally?

Take a program like the big bang theory for example. It rates around the 700,000 - 1 million mark on 9, and when it's on Go! it rates about 300,000. Neighbours is another example, rating over 500,000 nightly when it used to be on Ten and now about 300,000 on Eleven. What happened to these hundreds of thousands of viewers? Answer, the core viewers will obviously switch over to the multichannel but the viewers who may have the TV on say Ten for the news might just leave their TV on Ten for the rest of the night and may not even be watching the TV. Same deal goes for 7 and 9, some people just leave the TV on after they've finished watching a program such as the news.

sport isn't a sitcom or a TV drama
pretty much everyone knows where its shown & when its on & they have one opportunity to watch it live ...

the Swines core veiwership is about 50K
a final ... as has been proven adds about 100K regardless of wether its on the main or digital ch
thats the max audience

VFL is just a yawn for most sydneysiders
end of

It doesn't matter what type of program it is, the same principle applies. People watch a show they like and leave the TV on that channel if they go to do something else, e.g. go on the computer. The prelim final would have well exceeded the multichannel ratings if it was on the main channel.

it matters a great deal
you can catch up on a sitcom or a TV drama
sport you can only watch live .... ONCE

hence your maximum audience on either main or secondary ... the proof , the same audience for the Swines on both in a final

thats as big as it gets for them in Sydney outside a GF
Reece Witherspoon >>> the Swines in a final in Sydney [/quote]
So why has Neighbours ratings gone down by about 200,000 since its move from Ten to Eleven? When it was on Ten people could still catch up on it as they can now, but what's caused the large drop in ratings?

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Grand Final and a few finals all rating in the hundreds of thousands. If 7 had put the Sydney v Collingwood prelim on 7 that would have rated well over 300,000. They made a mistake however, as that prelim ended up out rating their program on Channel 7 at 8.30. Sydney-centric dumb fucks

300K for the swines prelim on the main channel in sydney .... ...
the swines used to get only about 150K in finals .. when they were on the main channel
they got their ... maximum non GF audience for the prelim this year
thats about as high as it goes for the Victorian game in Sydney outside a GF

it outrated the rubbish on the main channel on 7.... because 600K were watching the NRL on 9
Ch 7 in Sydney for the Swines prelim... got it dead right

On the main digital channel the Swans were getting 100k for day games which is 1/3rd of the NRL games on Sunday in Sydney. So 1/3 of the NRL's ratings is poor is it?

Id suggest thats pretty good. If there are 1 million NRL supporters in Sydney then that suggests there are 333k AFL supporters =D> =D> =D>

oh what F'ing snot

Swines 2011 ratings on the main channel

http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2011.php

rnd 1..70,000
rnd 2...66,000
rnd 3...55,000
rnd 4... 59,000
rnd 6... 27,000
rnd 7.... too low to rate !!
rnd 8...57,000
rnd 9...49,000
rnd 10...11,000
rnd 11...13,000
rnd 12...71,000


should I go on ?

the next 12 rounds are pretty similar to the first 12
biggest audience
100K V collingwood in rnd 14 ( a night game ) ...... so thats 100K...... ONCE all up & NONE during the day ... not regularly as you suggested you lying bag of shite

again
I've proven the swines get the same FTA audience regardless
they have a max
its 150K approx

for the amount of primetime coverage they received ova the last 30 years
thats pathetic

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

So if no such agreement was in place, would you care if the nRL GF was shown on Gem nationally?

Take a program like the big bang theory for example. It rates around the 700,000 - 1 million mark on 9, and when it's on Go! it rates about 300,000. Neighbours is another example, rating over 500,000 nightly when it used to be on Ten and now about 300,000 on Eleven. What happened to these hundreds of thousands of viewers? Answer, the core viewers will obviously switch over to the multichannel but the viewers who may have the TV on say Ten for the news might just leave their TV on Ten for the rest of the night and may not even be watching the TV. Same deal goes for 7 and 9, some people just leave the TV on after they've finished watching a program such as the news.

sport isn't a sitcom or a TV drama
pretty much everyone knows where its shown & when its on & they have one opportunity to watch it live ...

the Swines core veiwership is about 50K
a final ... as has been proven adds about 100K regardless of wether its on the main or digital ch
thats the max audience

VFL is just a yawn for most sydneysiders
end of

It doesn't matter what type of program it is, the same principle applies. People watch a show they like and leave the TV on that channel if they go to do something else, e.g. go on the computer. The prelim final would have well exceeded the multichannel ratings if it was on the main channel.

it matters a great deal
you can catch up on a sitcom or a TV drama
sport you can only watch live .... ONCE

hence your maximum audience on either main or secondary ... the proof , the same audience for the Swines on both in a final

thats as big as it gets for them in Sydney outside a GF
Reece Witherspoon >>> the Swines in a final in Sydney [/quote]
So why has Neighbours ratings gone down by about 200,000 since its move from Ten to Eleven? When it was on Ten people could still catch up on it as they can now, but what's caused the large drop in ratings?[/quote]

no idea
but the reason does not apply here
the proof
the swines ratings on the main channel

end of

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

So if no such agreement was in place, would you care if the nRL GF was shown on Gem nationally?

Take a program like the big bang theory for example. It rates around the 700,000 - 1 million mark on 9, and when it's on Go! it rates about 300,000. Neighbours is another example, rating over 500,000 nightly when it used to be on Ten and now about 300,000 on Eleven. What happened to these hundreds of thousands of viewers? Answer, the core viewers will obviously switch over to the multichannel but the viewers who may have the TV on say Ten for the news might just leave their TV on Ten for the rest of the night and may not even be watching the TV. Same deal goes for 7 and 9, some people just leave the TV on after they've finished watching a program such as the news.

sport isn't a sitcom or a TV drama
pretty much everyone knows where its shown & when its on & they have one opportunity to watch it live ...

the Swines core veiwership is about 50K
a final ... as has been proven adds about 100K regardless of wether its on the main or digital ch
thats the max audience

VFL is just a yawn for most sydneysiders
end of

It doesn't matter what type of program it is, the same principle applies. People watch a show they like and leave the TV on that channel if they go to do something else, e.g. go on the computer. The prelim final would have well exceeded the multichannel ratings if it was on the main channel.

it matters a great deal
you can catch up on a sitcom or a TV drama
sport you can only watch live .... ONCE

hence your maximum audience on either main or secondary ... the proof , the same audience for the Swines on both in a final

thats as big as it gets for them in Sydney outside a GF
Reece Witherspoon >>> the Swines in a final in Sydney [/quote]
So why has Neighbours ratings gone down by about 200,000 since its move from Ten to Eleven? When it was on Ten people could still catch up on it as they can now, but what's caused the large drop in ratings?[/quote]

no idea
but the reason does not apply here
the proof
the swines ratings on the main channel

end of [/quote]
It's because as I said before, people leave the TV on whatever channel they were last watching if they go and do something else. As the main channels have all the big programs and news on them, they attract more ratings. Even the Formula 1 this year which moved from One to Ten in the eastern states for Grand Prixes starting at 9.30 on Sunday's saw an increase in viewers after the switch. All of a sudden an extra 50,00-100,000 were watching. Where were these viewers when it was exclusive to One?

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

So if no such agreement was in place, would you care if the nRL GF was shown on Gem nationally?

Take a program like the big bang theory for example. It rates around the 700,000 - 1 million mark on 9, and when it's on Go! it rates about 300,000. Neighbours is another example, rating over 500,000 nightly when it used to be on Ten and now about 300,000 on Eleven. What happened to these hundreds of thousands of viewers? Answer, the core viewers will obviously switch over to the multichannel but the viewers who may have the TV on say Ten for the news might just leave their TV on Ten for the rest of the night and may not even be watching the TV. Same deal goes for 7 and 9, some people just leave the TV on after they've finished watching a program such as the news.

sport isn't a sitcom or a TV drama
pretty much everyone knows where its shown & when its on & they have one opportunity to watch it live ...

the Swines core veiwership is about 50K
a final ... as has been proven adds about 100K regardless of wether its on the main or digital ch
thats the max audience

VFL is just a yawn for most sydneysiders
end of

It doesn't matter what type of program it is, the same principle applies. People watch a show they like and leave the TV on that channel if they go to do something else, e.g. go on the computer. The prelim final would have well exceeded the multichannel ratings if it was on the main channel.

it matters a great deal
you can catch up on a sitcom or a TV drama
sport you can only watch live .... ONCE

hence your maximum audience on either main or secondary ... the proof , the same audience for the Swines on both in a final

thats as big as it gets for them in Sydney outside a GF
Reece Witherspoon >>> the Swines in a final in Sydney [/quote]
So why has Neighbours ratings gone down by about 200,000 since its move from Ten to Eleven? When it was on Ten people could still catch up on it as they can now, but what's caused the large drop in ratings?[/quote]

no idea
but the reason does not apply here
the proof
the swines ratings on the main channel

end of [/quote]
It's because as I said before, people leave the TV on whatever channel they were last watching if they go and do something else. As the main channels have all the big programs and news on them, they attract more ratings. ?[/quote]

ah no
they never did that with Swines games in the past
again
I have proof

you have theories & fairy tales

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

So if no such agreement was in place, would you care if the nRL GF was shown on Gem nationally?

Take a program like the big bang theory for example. It rates around the 700,000 - 1 million mark on 9, and when it's on Go! it rates about 300,000. Neighbours is another example, rating over 500,000 nightly when it used to be on Ten and now about 300,000 on Eleven. What happened to these hundreds of thousands of viewers? Answer, the core viewers will obviously switch over to the multichannel but the viewers who may have the TV on say Ten for the news might just leave their TV on Ten for the rest of the night and may not even be watching the TV. Same deal goes for 7 and 9, some people just leave the TV on after they've finished watching a program such as the news.

sport isn't a sitcom or a TV drama
pretty much everyone knows where its shown & when its on & they have one opportunity to watch it live ...

the Swines core veiwership is about 50K
a final ... as has been proven adds about 100K regardless of wether its on the main or digital ch
thats the max audience

VFL is just a yawn for most sydneysiders
end of

It doesn't matter what type of program it is, the same principle applies. People watch a show they like and leave the TV on that channel if they go to do something else, e.g. go on the computer. The prelim final would have well exceeded the multichannel ratings if it was on the main channel.

it matters a great deal
you can catch up on a sitcom or a TV drama
sport you can only watch live .... ONCE

hence your maximum audience on either main or secondary ... the proof , the same audience for the Swines on both in a final

thats as big as it gets for them in Sydney outside a GF
Reece Witherspoon >>> the Swines in a final in Sydney [/quote]
So why has Neighbours ratings gone down by about 200,000 since its move from Ten to Eleven? When it was on Ten people could still catch up on it as they can now, but what's caused the large drop in ratings?[/quote]

no idea
but the reason does not apply here
the proof
the swines ratings on the main channel

end of [/quote]
It's because as I said before, people leave the TV on whatever channel they were last watching if they go and do something else. As the main channels have all the big programs and news on them, they attract more ratings. ?[/quote]

ah no
they never did that with Swines games in the past
again
I have proof

you have theories & fairy tales [/quote]
Until the Swans play a prelim final on the main channel these days (as AFL has become more popular in NSW in the last decade) you have no proof... about anything.

They played premil finals on their only fucking channel for the years they got that far, what else do you need to make you see that is their bloody limit?

You but but but more than xbutter

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

They played premil finals on their only fucking channel for the years they got that far, what else do you need to make you see that is their bloody limit?

You but but but more than xbutter

What were the ratings for the 05 and 06 prelims for the Swans?

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

300K for the swines prelim on the main channel in sydney .... ...
the swines used to get only about 150K in finals .. when they were on the main channel
they got their ... maximum non GF audience for the prelim this year
thats about as high as it goes for the Victorian game in Sydney outside a GF

it outrated the rubbish on the main channel on 7.... because 600K were watching the NRL on 9
Ch 7 in Sydney for the Swines prelim... got it dead right

On the main digital channel the Swans were getting 100k for day games which is 1/3rd of the NRL games on Sunday in Sydney. So 1/3 of the NRL's ratings is poor is it?

Id suggest thats pretty good. If there are 1 million NRL supporters in Sydney then that suggests there are 333k AFL supporters =D> =D> =D>

oh what F'ing snot

Swines 2011 ratings on the main channel

http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2011.php

rnd 1..70,000
rnd 2...66,000
rnd 3...55,000
rnd 4... 59,000
rnd 6... 27,000
rnd 7.... too low to rate !!
rnd 8...57,000
rnd 9...49,000
rnd 10...11,000
rnd 11...13,000
rnd 12...71,000


should I go on ?

the next 12 rounds are pretty similar to the first 12
biggest audience
100K V collingwood in rnd 14 ( a night game ) ...... so thats 100K...... ONCE all up & NONE during the day ... not regularly as you suggested you lying bag of shite

again
I've proven the swines get the same FTA audience regardless
they have a max
its 150K approx

for the amount of primetime coverage they received ova the last 30 years
thats pathetic

Yet you conveniently forget they are shown against foxtel for the same game or another AFL gam, so blow it out you arse liar

Stewie wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

They played premil finals on their only fucking channel for the years they got that far, what else do you need to make you see that is their bloody limit?

You but but but more than xbutter

What were the ratings for the 05 and 06 prelims for the Swans?

Not fucking much.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

On the main digital channel the Swans were getting 100k for day games which is 1/3rd of the NRL games on Sunday in Sydney. So 1/3 of the NRL's ratings is poor is it?

Id suggest thats pretty good. If there are 1 million NRL supporters in Sydney then that suggests there are 333k AFL supporters =D> =D> =D>

oh what F'ing snot

Swines 2011 ratings on the main channel

http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2011.php

rnd 1..70,000
rnd 2...66,000
rnd 3...55,000
rnd 4... 59,000
rnd 6... 27,000
rnd 7.... too low to rate !!
rnd 8...57,000
rnd 9...49,000
rnd 10...11,000
rnd 11...13,000
rnd 12...71,000


should I go on ?

the next 12 rounds are pretty similar to the first 12
biggest audience
100K V collingwood in rnd 14 ( a night game ) ...... so thats 100K...... ONCE all up & NONE during the day ... not regularly as you suggested you lying bag of shite

again
I've proven the swines get the same FTA audience regardless
they have a max
its 150K approx

for the amount of primetime coverage they received ova the last 30 years
thats pathetic

Yet you conveniently forget they are shown against foxtel for the same game or another AFL gam, so blow it out you arse liar

Not before this year LIAR.


Bahahahahahahg but but but but but xbutterman

Wroong again fool. The Swans were regularly on FTA and payTV into Sydney before this year

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Stewie wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

They played premil finals on their only fucking channel for the years they got that far, what else do you need to make you see that is their bloody limit?

You but but but more than xbutter

What were the ratings for the 05 and 06 prelims for the Swans?

Not fucking much.

This is the response you get when you ask for evidence!

Xman wrote:

Wroong again fool. The Swans were regularly on FTA and payTV into Sydney before this year

Pay per view channel that didn't even get enough people to register a single ratings point the whole time they were on there?

Bahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahhhaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahh.

Oh stop it, you're too much!





Funniest post of the year, we have a late entry.


















=D> =D> =D>

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Xman wrote:

Wroong again fool. The Swans were regularly on FTA and payTV into Sydney before this year

Pay per view channel that didn't even get enough people to register a single ratings point the whole time they were on there?

Bahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahhhaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahh.

Oh stop it, you're too much!





Funniest post of the year, we have a late entry.


















=D> =D> =D>

Swans were on FTA and payTV last year in rnd 1. The FTA ratings for Sydney were 55k, excluding 1HD. The payTV ratings were 175k.