Talking Footy

Drac wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

bigger crowds ?..... since when as 5K been bigger then 10K .... the fudgey wudgey midgets can hide behind inflated crowd figures all they want
we all know the truth

& what did extra TV exposure get them ?
more people & bussiness seeing how sh.it they are ................
here people ... heres your VFL side ..........

2012 average H&A attendance
GWS: 10,825
Raiders: 10,190

But the official figures don't matter apparently when you can just substitute them for arbitrary numbers that you like more

the official figures don't matter when they're utter BS ... just another item to add to the very long list of VFL porkies
tanking
participation rates
attendances at Midgets & thuns games


when will it end with this vile organisation

Raiderdave wrote:

Drac wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

bigger crowds ?..... since when as 5K been bigger then 10K .... the fudgey wudgey midgets can hide behind inflated crowd figures all they want
we all know the truth

& what did extra TV exposure get them ?
more people & bussiness seeing how sh.it they are ................
here people ... heres your VFL side ..........

2012 average H&A attendance
GWS: 10,825
Raiders: 10,190

But the official figures don't matter apparently when you can just substitute them for arbitrary numbers that you like more

the official figures don't matter when they're utter BS ... just another item to add to the very long list of VFL porkies
tanking
participation rates
attendances at Midgets & thuns games


when will it end with this vile organisation

Oh Dave, if the giants figures are BS then the raiders a definately fudged, so either way the giants won.

Drac wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

bigger crowds ?..... since when as 5K been bigger then 10K .... the fudgey wudgey midgets can hide behind inflated crowd figures all they want
we all know the truth

& what did extra TV exposure get them ?
more people & bussiness seeing how sh.it they are ................
here people ... heres your VFL side ..........

Oh, and that extra TV exposure got them more $$ from jumper sponsors than the Raiders, who only appeared on FTA TWICE ( ) in 2012.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/nrl/p ... 6209574532

new AFL franchise the GWS Giants have jumper sponsorships worth a whopping $3 million

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/rugby-l ... 23xfo.html

the Raiders will run out in 2013 in a strip bedazzled with an extraordinary $1.7 million in sponsorship branding - the most the club has ever received for uniform sponsorship

.

yes

skoda are just thrilled to be seen on tv all ova australia on jumpers being worn by bumbling *********
lets see how they go with their next lot of sponsorships

fool me once .. shame on you
fool me twice ..... well ... it just aint gunna happen

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Drac wrote:

2012 average H&A attendance
GWS: 10,825
Raiders: 10,190

But the official figures don't matter apparently when you can just substitute them for arbitrary numbers that you like more

the official figures don't matter when they're utter BS ... just another item to add to the very long list of VFL porkies
tanking
participation rates
attendances at Midgets & thuns games


when will it end with this vile organisation

Oh Dave, if the giants figures are BS then the raiders a definately fudged, so either way the giants won.

if anything the Raiders understate their crowds

the midgets count eyes ...
either that or there fans come to games dressed as orange seats

Raiderdave wrote:

Drac wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

bigger crowds ?..... since when as 5K been bigger then 10K .... the fudgey wudgey midgets can hide behind inflated crowd figures all they want
we all know the truth

& what did extra TV exposure get them ?
more people & bussiness seeing how sh.it they are ................
here people ... heres your VFL side ..........

Oh, and that extra TV exposure got them more $$ from jumper sponsors than the Raiders, who only appeared on FTA TWICE ( ) in 2012.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/nrl/p ... 6209574532

new AFL franchise the GWS Giants have jumper sponsorships worth a whopping $3 million

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/rugby-l ... 23xfo.html

the Raiders will run out in 2013 in a strip bedazzled with an extraordinary $1.7 million in sponsorship branding - the most the club has ever received for uniform sponsorship

.

yes

skoda are just thrilled to be seen on tv all ova australia on jumpers being worn by bumbling *********
lets see how they go with their next lot of sponsorships

fool me once .. shame on you
fool me twice ..... well ... it just aint gunna happen

The Giants, unline the Raiders, won't ever run out onto a field without a jumper sponser.

Drac wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Drac wrote:

Oh, and that extra TV exposure got them more $$ from jumper sponsors than the Raiders, who only appeared on FTA TWICE ( ) in 2012.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/nrl/p ... 6209574532
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/rugby-l ... 23xfo.html
.

yes

skoda are just thrilled to be seen on tv all ova australia on jumpers being worn by bumbling *********
lets see how they go with their next lot of sponsorships

fool me once .. shame on you
fool me twice ..... well ... it just aint gunna happen

The Giants, unline the Raiders, won't ever run out onto a field without a jumper sponser.

the midgets .. unlike the raiders .... won't ever post a profit either

Raiderdave wrote:

Drac wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

yes

skoda are just thrilled to be seen on tv all ova australia on jumpers being worn by bumbling *********
lets see how they go with their next lot of sponsorships

fool me once .. shame on you
fool me twice ..... well ... it just aint gunna happen

The Giants, unline the Raiders, won't ever run out onto a field without a jumper sponser.

the midgets .. unlike the raiders .... won't ever post a profit either

Since when is a 200k loss a profit? And don't BS about the raiders business arm either. It's a seperate company. And even with income from them the raiders make a loss, including funding from the ACT government

Raiderdave wrote:

Drac wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

bigger crowds ?..... since when as 5K been bigger then 10K .... the fudgey wudgey midgets can hide behind inflated crowd figures all they want
we all know the truth

& what did extra TV exposure get them ?
more people & bussiness seeing how sh.it they are ................
here people ... heres your VFL side ..........

2012 average H&A attendance
GWS: 10,825
Raiders: 10,190

But the official figures don't matter apparently when you can just substitute them for arbitrary numbers that you like more

the official figures don't matter when they're utter BS ... just another item to add to the very long list of VFL porkies
tanking
participation rates
attendances at Midgets & thuns games


when will it end with this vile organisation

Of the nRL and the AFL, only one competition has been exposed as lying about attendance figures. And it wasn't the AFL.

But it's okay. The crowds at the Suns and Giants are a lie, both teams will fold within 2 years. No one North of the Murray plays Australian Football - the numbers are all a lie, all AFL memberships are dogs and cats, 95% of crowds at the MCG are children that get in for $5. The People of Perth are just GAGGING for an nRL team, the Storm crowds would rise if only they could play at Etihad, no one attended the Swans' GF parade in Sydney - it was all coincidence that they were wearing red and white and holding Swans banners, the Swans support in Sydney is dwindling - the SCG redevelopment is irrelevant, the Lions will fold in a matter of years - the massive investment in their Springwood pokie palace is irrelevant, AFL TV ratings are a lie - probably just people channel surfing. NRL ratings, when high, are accurate however.

Oh and Drac you forgot to add

Israel Falou left the Giants to play RL for less money and that the AFL's 'experiment' with him failed dismally, apart from all the negative publicity they've received

Back on topic! :D

King-Eliagh wrote:

Oh and Drac you forgot to add

Israel Falou left the Giants to play RL for less money and that the AFL's 'experiment' with him failed dismally, apart from all the negative publicity they've received

Back on topic! :D

It didnt fail. It had three purposes and two were achieved. 2 out of three is a pass.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Drac wrote:

The Giants, unline the Raiders, won't ever run out onto a field without a jumper sponser.

the midgets .. unlike the raiders .... won't ever post a profit either

Since when is a 200k loss a profit? And don't BS about the raiders business arm either. It's a seperate company. And even with income from them the raiders make a loss, including funding from the ACT government

we all know the Canberra Raiders posted a 3.4 Million dollar profit ...
our club is run under one umbrella for all its activities ... one board governing all business interests
one of the best run clubs in the Country

its a hard pill to swallow D head , trying to poke fun at a club that posts a bigger profit then the VFL's biggest club is butthurt central for singlet wearers ....
its but this
& but that
& ... hang on a sec ... wait a minute ... a few of these .. couple of these

followed by a swag of these ......

Raiders .... kewl

King-Eliagh wrote:

Oh and Drac you forgot to add

Israel Falou left the Giants to play RL for less money and that the AFL's 'experiment' with him failed dismally, apart from all the negative publicity they've received

Back on topic! :D

he also forgot to mention that VFL is an overtly racist .... & sexist sport as well E
pretty shoddy effort on his part

get it right son

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

the midgets .. unlike the raiders .... won't ever post a profit either

Since when is a 200k loss a profit? And don't BS about the raiders business arm either. It's a seperate company. And even with income from them the raiders make a loss, including funding from the ACT government

we all know the Canberra Raiders posted a 3.4 Million dollar profit ...
our club is run under one umbrella for all its activities ... one board governing all business interests
one of the best run clubs in the Country

its a hard pill to swallow D head , trying to poke fun at a club that posts a bigger profit then the VFL's biggest club is butthurt central for singlet wearers ....
its but this
& but that
& ... hang on a sec ... wait a minute ... a few of these .. couple of these

followed by a swag of these ......

Raiders .... kewl

A dismal season on the field for the NRL operation last year was matched by below-par financial performance, slumping to a loss of more than $220,000 on revenues of almost $12 million, including nearly $2 million in cash and in-kind benefits from the ACT government.

http://www.smh.com.au/act-news/corporat ... =text-only

A profit? liar

Raiderdave wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Oh and Drac you forgot to add

Israel Falou left the Giants to play RL for less money and that the AFL's 'experiment' with him failed dismally, apart from all the negative publicity they've received

Back on topic! :D

he also forgot to mention that VFL is an overtly racist .... & sexist sport as well E
pretty shoddy effort on his part

get it right son

True. Remember when one of the AFL's SOO coaches racially vilified an opposition player, causing another player to walk out, and the governing body tried to cover it all up as an injury? Man that was poor form by us, and indicative of an established culture of racism.

Oh wait, that wasn't the AFL, that happened in a niche East Coast league....

http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport/nrl ... 5878916612

Drac wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Oh and Drac you forgot to add

Israel Falou left the Giants to play RL for less money and that the AFL's 'experiment' with him failed dismally, apart from all the negative publicity they've received

Back on topic! :D

he also forgot to mention that VFL is an overtly racist .... & sexist sport as well E
pretty shoddy effort on his part

get it right son

True. Remember when one of the AFL's SOO coaches racially vilified an opposition player, causing another player to walk out, and the governing body tried to cover it all up as an injury? Man that was poor form by us, and indicative of an established culture of racism.

Oh wait, that wasn't the AFL, that happened in a niche East Coast league....

http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport/nrl ... 5878916612

Or when an official supporter group of a SOO team racially abused indigenous players from the other team at the ground and on twitter but faced no consequences. Who was that again? Oh yeah, the NRL, and this year too.