

Every clubs crowds rise and fall with their on field performance, except the storm of course!

The swans home crowds will rise again when their home grounds renovations are complete. What's the storms excuse?


Swines crowds & they made the finals 4 out of these 5 yearsXman wrote:![]()
![]()
Every clubs crowds rise and fall with their on field performance,
liar!Raiderdave wrote:Swines crowds & they made the finals 4 out of these 5 yearsXman wrote:![]()
![]()
Every clubs crowds rise and fall with their on field performance,
2008 down
2009 down
2010 down
2011 down
2012 down
yes marcus ..... you appear to be right with your assesment
oh wait![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Xman wrote:liar!Raiderdave wrote:Swines crowds & they made the finals 4 out of these 5 yearsXman wrote:![]()
![]()
Every clubs crowds rise and fall with their on field performance,
2008 down
2009 down
2010 down
2011 down
2012 down
yes marcus ..... you appear to be right with your assesment
oh wait![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Swans made the GF in 2005 and 2006. This corresponded with their peak attendances. They then slumped to 12th in 2009. They've starting rising again but their ground renovations have stopped the rise in crowds because of many sellout crowds. Once these renovations are finished they will rise again.
They then slumped to 12th in 2009. They've starting rising again
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
they made the finals & their crowds went up by ... 100 a gameXman wrote:They climbed in 2010 fool![]()
.
Stewie wrote:Because having a major redevelopment had nothing to do with the Swans minor decline in crowds this year, did it Raiderdave? Dumbarse.
Crowds and memberships tend to lag a year or so behind performance on the field. According to all NRL supporters on LU, and the BOM, 2011 was especially wet in Sydney causing a reduction in crowd figures. Yet they still remained higher than any Sydney NRL team.Raiderdave wrote:they made the finals & their crowds went up by ... 100 a gameXman wrote:They climbed in 2010 fool![]()
.![]()
explain why they went down by 4000 a game in 2011 despite making the finals again ..... & there was no rennovations being done
can you enlighten us here marcus![]()
I can see the but but butting already![]()
And how did it not affect crowds despite there being sell outs at the reduced capacity ground? The Swans v Hawks game would have probably gotten 35-40k, and the Swans Cats game probably 35k. Fucking dumbarseRaiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Because having a major redevelopment had nothing to do with the Swans minor decline in crowds this year, did it Raiderdave? Dumbarse.
it didn't ....
& how bout you have a crack at the above scenario & see if you can explain it
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
What?Striker wrote:No, fantastic, when we're stuck at the smallest venue in Melbourne! If the AFL would stop locking us out of Etihad we'd be up there with the Broncos!
Listen, X, the Swans has plenty of notice about the SCG work. And yet they kep the majority of their home games there, right? How stupid can a club be? What's wrong with ANZ?
Striker wrote:No, fantastic, when we're stuck at the smallest venue in Melbourne! If the AFL would stop locking us out of Etihad we'd be up there with the Broncos!
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
I can't tell if this is sarcasm? Is this sarcasm? Because logically speaking if you average only 12k in a 30k seat stadium, the problem isn't limited capacity....Striker wrote:No, fantastic, when we're stuck at the smallest venue in Melbourne! If the AFL would stop locking us out of Etihad we'd be up there with the Broncos
Raiderdave wrote:perception is reality
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests