Talking Footy

TLPG wrote:

There is no link, Mark. The club hushed it up as did the league (Super or AR - can't remember which). I assume it wasn't seen on TV - I don't even know if the game was covered. But I know what I saw. If you don't believe me then that's just too bad for you. I have never lied on this forum and I'm not about to start because only mugs lies and I'm not one of them.

.

Xman wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

Essendon’s Angus Monfries told Channel 7′s Game Day program ”There was a laser beam out there. I noticed it a couple of times, I was on the mark when Sydney were kicking out once and it was shining around my eyes. It was a bit distracting at the time.” According to AAP, the AFL say several players from Essendon complained regarding the laser but they were unable to track the culprit down and there’s nothing that can be done unless the person owns up or is dobbed in.

How long is it going to be until a ******** in the crowd shining a laser in a player’s eyes costs a team a match or even worse a place in the finals at the important end of the season?. Or if caught ban them for life from attending any sporting event across the board.
quote]
Nice one Mark. A laser beam

MarkZZZ wrote:

There we have it, the players think it's a serious matter of bad crowd behavior yet Xman thinks it's all a joke. That says something doesn't it?

MarkZZZ wrote:

You stated it as fact. You didn't say "in my opinion." To paraphrase "it was worse than the battle of windy hill". BS claim still stands.


No proof = BS

MarkZZZ wrote:

Xman wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

Essendon’s Angus Monfries told Channel 7′s Game Day program ”There was a laser beam out there. I noticed it a couple of times, I was on the mark when Sydney were kicking out once and it was shining around my eyes. It was a bit distracting at the time.” According to AAP, the AFL say several players from Essendon complained regarding the laser but they were unable to track the culprit down and there’s nothing that can be done unless the person owns up or is dobbed in.

How long is it going to be until a ******** in the crowd shining a laser in a player’s eyes costs a team a match or even worse a place in the finals at the important end of the season?. Or if caught ban them for life from attending any sporting event across the board.
quote]
Nice one Mark. A laser beam

There we have it, the players think it's a serious matter of bad crowd behavior yet Xman thinks it's all a joke. That says something doesn't it?

calling it a laser pointer rather than a laser beam would have been more correct but it is AFL players we are talking about and nobody said they had to do too much more than kick and catch and have to know the difference between the two

Xman wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

Xman wrote:

There we have it, the players think it's a serious matter of bad crowd behavior yet Xman thinks it's all a joke. That says something doesn't it?

calling it a laser pointer rather than a laser beam would have been more correct but it is AFL players we are talking about and nobody said they had to do too much more than kick and catch and have to know the difference between the two

It was probably some kid playing the fool. Unnecessary but hardly a concern.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Nice cover Xman. Just as I predicted

A fight can be measured to be worse than another on several variables. two simple and quantifiable measures would be.

1: number of participants
2. number of injuries

TLPG must prove his claim and provide a link or be issued with a BS point. But you wouldnt do that now would you Xman

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

There we have it, the players think it's a serious matter of bad crowd behavior yet Xman thinks it's all a joke. That says something doesn't it?

calling it a laser pointer rather than a laser beam would have been more correct but it is AFL players we are talking about and nobody said they had to do too much more than kick and catch and have to know the difference between the two

It was probably some kid playing the fool. Unnecessary but hardly a concern.

And here it is again. A player is concerned this might swing a match one day and Xman, in full view, sweeps it under the carpet as "hardly a concern".

The sweeping dingbat strikes once more.

Now sweep TLPGs BS where the sun dont shine Xman!

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman wrote:

It was probably some kid playing the fool. Unnecessary but hardly a concern.

And here it is again. A player is concerned this might swing a match one day and Xman, in full view, sweeps it under the carpet as "hardly a concern".

The sweeping dingbat strikes once more.

Now sweep TLPGs BS where the sun dont shine Xman!

No one swept anything. I was at the game. The match weent without a hitch. The players reported the issue and it was dealt with. Nothing like this has happened again. If you think this is serious I feel sorry for you.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

And here it is again. A player is concerned this might swing a match one day and Xman, in full view, sweeps it under the carpet as "hardly a concern".

The sweeping dingbat strikes once more.

Now sweep TLPGs BS where the sun dont shine Xman!

No one swept anything. I was at the game. The match weent without a hitch. The players reported the issue and it was dealt with. Nothing like this has happened again. If you think this is serious I feel sorry for you.

I agree with the players, it's a serious issue. We know you dont give two hoots what the players think Xman. That's just you, you're an armchair expert with little awareness of what the players experience.

Go on now, sweep that bad stuff away.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ahh on reading of the battle of windy hill there's plenty of data on numbers of participants and injuries.

The dingbat sweepers sweep blocked again

[quote"dingbat sweeper"]However, as I said, proof of the incident is still required.

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ahh on reading of the battle of windy hill there's plenty of data on numbers of participants and injuries.

The dingbat sweepers sweep blocked again

[quote"dingbat sweeper"]However, as I said, proof of the incident is still required.

Or what Xman? You'll write TLPG a love pm?