Page 8 of 9
Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 10:41 pm
by King-Eliagh
Xman wrote:After round 12 is half the season!
You said half the season and rnd 12 originally. Then later you said rnd 12. You never stated this was a different term!
Keep digging loser!

Almost correct there Xman, but technically you're wrong. I stated "by round 12"in the bet which included the WB team. This is clear as day for all to see as is the fact "half the season"was never stated in the bet which included the WB team. If it was you would've pointed to clear evidence of it by now Xman. Wouldnt you have

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 10:45 pm
by Xman
Piss off loser. You said by the middle of the season after rnd 12. Then later you again mentioned rnd 12, but never said before it, or after rnd 11. You're welching!

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 10:51 pm
by King-Eliagh
I said "by"round 12. There's a clean technical difference, I'd say clearer than in the beausssie farce.
Now stop being pissweak and beg me to revert to the original terms with the inclusion of the WB team. Then i'll do what you see as morally right.

K? :D
got you by the balls Xman, got you by the balls. Now quit it with that half the season shite or i'll track down your lovely quotes from the beaussie raider dave farce and let Xman of three weeks ago contradict the fukk out of Xman today. You want that?

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 11:00 pm
by Xman
the suns wont count as a win in this bet beaussie. as the suns are official basketcases, they belong with the giants kids. The bulldogs will be an interesting match and if the bulldogs lose they may be worthy of induction into the basketcase league.
This is you regarding the original bet in the thread about one sided AFL games. You asked me to name 4-5 sides who were uncompetitive.

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 11:03 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:I said "by"round 12. There's a clean technical difference, I'd say clearer than in the beausssie farce.
Now stop being pissweak and beg me to revert to the original terms with the inclusion of the WB team. Then i'll do what you see as morally right.

K? :D
got you by the balls Xman, got you by the balls. Now quit it with that half the season shite or i'll track down your lovely quotes from the beaussie raider dave farce and let Xman of three weeks ago contradict the fukk out of Xman today. You want that?

Not even close. All along you were saying by mid season or after rnd 12. Even after the bulldogs were finally agreed upon you still said r12, but because you didn't say ' after" you're claiming you changed the terms. What a joke.

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 11:10 pm
by TLPG
KE, beg like a bitch to Xman to keep the bet open on the terms he explained and that he has proven that you agreed to.
Or Xman has every right to shut down the bet because you are a bully as well as a coward.
Oh - and if you want to talk technics, you should include in the "season" (as a definition of the half way point) the finals! Another nine games which by numbers makes up another full round to make 24 rounds in the season. Which makes the half way point of the whole season AFTER Round 12!!
Argue your way out of that one, idiot!
Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 11:28 pm
by Xman
TLPG wrote:KE, beg like a bitch to Xman to keep the bet open on the terms he explained and that he has proven that you agreed to.
Or Xman has every right to shut down the bet because you are a bully as well as a coward.
Oh - and if you want to talk technics, you should include in the "season" (as a definition of the half way point) the finals! Another nine games which by numbers makes up another full round to make 24 rounds in the season. Which makes the half way point of the whole season AFTER Round 12!!
Argue your way out of that one, idiot!
Very good point TLPG. If KE wants to be a smart arse mid season including finals is about rnd 14.

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:38 am
by King-Eliagh
Xman wrote:the suns wont count as a win in this bet beaussie. as the suns are official basketcases, they belong with the giants kids. The bulldogs will be an interesting match and if the bulldogs lose they may be worthy of induction into the basketcase league.
This is you regarding the original bet in the thread about one sided AFL games. You asked me to name 4-5 sides who were uncompetitive.

Note KE's description (bolded for Xman's convenience), which again is lost on the cluesless Xman. I'm afraid this is not stated in the bet which was eventually made Xman. I've had about enough of your providing nothing more than quotes which refer to previous bets Xman. You have no evidence of the current bet including the Western Buldogs going for half the season or after the completion of round 12. I'VE HAD IT!!!
*KE looks around the room and produces an old dusty wooden box.
Your honor I would like to bring to the floor to represent me in this case...the ghost of Xman's past!
*the jury and crowd releases a shared gasp as KE opens the box and produces a brand spankin Ipad
well it is the ghost of Xman's very very recent past
*after logging into the Ipad Xman's ghost of the past is revealed to all
Xman's ghost of the past wrote:Reading through the thread and reviewing the details of this bet it's clear there were no terms agreed to
*KE points the Ipad to Xman present
Xman's ghost of the past wrote:Provide your evidence of agreed terms or shut up cry baby!
*KE puts the ipad back in the dusty wooden box and smirks at Xman
I rest my case your honor
Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:02 am
by Xman
Mid season is mid season, not round 11. You never stated the terms had changed because you still referred to rnd12. Why would you refer to after round 12 in one comment and before round 12 in another, despite never using the term 'before'

Surely you would keep the terms consistent and just say after round 11.
There is no way I would have bet that one of the bottom 5 teams would have beaten one of the top 13 teams twice after only 10 games!
Welcher! Bet cancelled due to your cowardice!

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:13 am
by King-Eliagh
I clearly used the term 'after' (round 12) in the initial bet, and 'by' (round 12) in the current bet.
* KE opens dusty wooden box and pulls out the ghost of Xman's past once more.
Ghost of Xman's recent past wrote:Here's your chance (Xman): insert your evidence here: ....................................................................
Oh dear, looks like the Xman of 3 weeks ago might have you stumped here Xman

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:14 am
by King-Eliagh
Ghost of Xman's recent past wrote:The problem is youve failed to provide the actual relevant evidence of the agreed terms dumbass!
:_<>
Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:16 am
by TLPG
You had no right to do that, KE, because you also said "mid season" and you never changed that at any point!
As I have already proven, the half way point is AFTER Round 12!
So stop trolling and start begging Xman if you want the bet to be restored!
(If he doesn't, Xman, I suggest you lock this thread to prevent further whining)
Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:23 am
by King-Eliagh
TLPG wrote:You had no right to do that, KE, because you also said "mid season" and you never changed that at any point!
As I have already proven, the half way point is AFTER Round 12!
So stop trolling and start begging Xman if you want the bet to be restored!
(If he doesn't, Xman, I suggest you lock this thread to prevent further whining)
Oh but beaussie never changed his "whole of season avatar bet" at any point yet you wankers supported him in his cause to have his penalty almost reduced to nothing. Oh how the tide has turned, ohhhh how it turns.
*Insert Eric Cartman's voice
I got you by the balls TLPG. Got you by the balls 
Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:35 am
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:I clearly used the term 'after' (round 12) in the initial bet, and 'by' (round 12) in the current bet.
* KE opens dusty wooden box and pulls out the ghost of Xman's past once more.
Ghost of Xman's recent past wrote:Here's your chance (Xman): insert your evidence here: ....................................................................
Oh dear, looks like the Xman of 3 weeks ago might have you stumped here Xman

So why not say 'after rnd 11' to avoid confusion? Why not highlight the change in terms.
Don't you think if you were changing the terms by an entire round that you shouldn't have used an ambiguous term like "by round 12", especially when you had used the same round to reference the end of the betting period prior??
You were either deliberately trying to deceive or you're a complete liar and coward!

Re: KE vs Xman - The Bet
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:36 am
by TLPG
Somebody call KE a WAHHHHHHHHmbulance!
Whiner, Coward and Bully all rolling into one - and a troll on top of that.