Page 8 of 10

Re: BS file claim#18: the nrl who had a blacks VS whites gam

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 11:23 am
by cos789
King-Eliagh wrote:
political correctness is a joke enacted by clueless individuals disengaged with reality.
Isn't that what Andrew Bolt said ?

Re: BS file claim#18: the nrl who had a blacks VS whites gam

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 1:01 pm
by King-Eliagh
Get back on topic cos, that's what i just wrote. Now answer the question below the image in my last post. :wink:

Re: BS file claim#18: the nrl who had a blacks VS whites gam

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 7:57 pm
by cos789
What do you want me to do ?
King-Eliagh wrote:
Get back on topic cos,
or
King-Eliagh wrote:
Now answer the question below the image in my last post

:?: :?: :?:

Re: BS file claim#18: the nrl who had a blacks VS whites gam

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:53 pm
by King-Eliagh
Both wanker. Tell me how the picture of the players represents divisiveness. :)

Re: BS file claim#18: the nrl who had a blacks VS whites gam

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:56 pm
by Xman
Verdict: bs point to Cos789.

There can be no other decision. The term was totally incorrect and if used in general discussion should have been accompanied with an explanation for its context, which it did not.

Re: BS file claim#18: the nrl who had a blacks VS whites gam

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 9:50 pm
by cos789
Xman wrote:
Verdict: bs point to Cos789.

There can be no other decision. The term was totally incorrect and if used in general discussion should have been accompanied with an explanation for its context, which it did not.

You know that's bs .
Direct quote from Andrew bolt.
At the same time you allow parafeel's explanation of "participation" as a kick around.
Pathetic, luckily all this bs is bs .

Re: BS file claim#18: the nrl who had a blacks VS whites gam

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 9:53 pm
by cos789
cos789 wrote:
Xman wrote:
Verdict: bs point to Cos789.

There can be no other decision. The term was totally incorrect and if used in general discussion should have been accompanied with an explanation for its context, which it did not.

You know that's bs .
Direct quote from Andrew bolt.
You asked for examples and I gave you plenty.
What's the deal. ?
At the same time you allow parafeel's explanation of "participation" as a kick around.
You allow RFL= rl.
Yet you dismiss a direct quote from a journalist in three newspapers.
Pathetic, luckily all this bs is bs .

Re: BS file claim#18: the nrl who had a blacks VS whites gam

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:12 pm
by Xman
cos789 wrote:
Xman wrote:
Verdict: bs point to Cos789.

There can be no other decision. The term was totally incorrect and if used in general discussion should have been accompanied with an explanation for its context, which it did not.

You know that's bs .
Direct quote from Andrew bolt.
At the same time you allow parafeel's explanation of "participation" as a kick around.
Pathetic, luckily all this bs is bs .
It's still bs whether its used by others or not.

Re: BS file claim#18: the nrl who had a blacks VS whites gam

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:25 pm
by King-Eliagh
cos789 wrote:
Direct quote from Andrew bolt.
:lol:

Re: BS file claim#18: the nrl who had a blacks VS whites gam

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:42 pm
by cos789
Xman wrote:
cos789 wrote:
Xman wrote:
Verdict: bs point to Cos789.

There can be no other decision. The term was totally incorrect and if used in general discussion should have been accompanied with an explanation for its context, which it did not.

You know that's bs .
Direct quote from Andrew bolt.
At the same time you allow parafeel's explanation of "participation" as a kick around.
Pathetic, luckily all this bs is bs .
It's still bs whether its used by others or not.
Xman, Xman, Xman so you're saying your opinion overides Andrew Bolt's.
Oneil was proven to be inaccurate.
Yet you accept some official who says there's 2million rl participants in the PNG
because you think it's feasible.
Then your definition of "across" is not right across.
But your definition of RFL is all rl.

I think I'll leave it to yourselves.

Re: BS file claim#18: the nrl who had a blacks VS whites gam

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:47 pm
by Xman
Even NSWAFL agreed your claim was bs on the first page of this file.

Re: BS file claim#18: the nrl who had a blacks VS whites gam

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:52 pm
by NSWAFL
And I stand by it now, Cos. You stuffed up and using Andrew Bolt as a source didn't help you. It hurt you.

You embarassed the great game of AFL with this one, mate. Sorry.

Re: BS file claim#18: the nrl who had a blacks VS whites gam

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:00 am
by King-Eliagh
Even I agreed it was BS cos. :) Xman, I'm proud you feel your opinion overrides Andrew Bolt's :lol: Give yourself a best and smartest point. And actually did you rethink my other suggestions in this thread? I suggested cos receive a dumbarse point, he obviously hasnt learnt his lesson yet, so slap it on him. I may have suggested I receive a best and smartest point but thats not really right, it should go to cooee and yourself Xman.

cos what's with your Andrew Bolt affinity? The guy clearly has an enlarged melon and puts tickets on himself when he has no clue what he's talking about. Ohhhhh, *penny drops* :lol:

Re: BS file claim#18: the nrl who had a blacks VS whites gam

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:01 am
by King-Eliagh
By the way cos? That sole BS point looks fantastic on you.

Re: BS file claim#18: the nrl who had a blacks VS whites gam

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:23 am
by Beaussie
I tend to agree with cos. He is backed by many sources that call the game is Blacks vs Whites. In the end I don't adjudicate these files. Just sayin I hear where you're coming from cos.