Page 8 of 9
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:42 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Muhahahahahahahah.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:46 pm
by NSWAFL
ParraEelsNRL wrote:LOL, the not real Nth Kangawhos have relocated and failed more times in different areas than the removed expansion sides in the ARL have lost, fact.
RL
Perth Reds
Adelaide Rams (don't count as they were a SL team made up to get a comp off the ground)
SE QLD Crushers.
Not Real Nth Kangawhos
Melbourne Multiple times lol.
West Sydney
Canberra
Gold Coast
And soon the be Tasmania and Ballarat.
The only time they were seriously looking at establishing themselves was in Sydney. They have been Melbourne based since James Brayshaw took over and he has made it clear that they are staying in Melbourne.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:00 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
That's why they are playing 4 games in the Two headed state and are looking at Ballarat?
Hmmm, staying put.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:06 pm
by NSWAFL
Yes, staying put. If they weren't they wouldn't be playing any games in Melbourne.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:08 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Delusion.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:10 pm
by NSWAFL
That's you, Debbie. Deluded to the max.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:14 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Well shiit, I already said you are, no need to repeat it.
If staying put means playing games in another state, then that's staying put I guess.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 1:27 am
by cos789
NSWAFL wrote:The only time they were seriously looking at establishing themselves was in Sydney. They have been Melbourne based since James Brayshaw took over and he has made it clear that they are staying in Melbourne.
Actually the ROOS have never committed to anywhere other than Melbourne.
IMO they'd been more open to re-locating something might have eventuated but they didn't.
Pretty pathetic attempt parafeel to suggest that the Roos are some sort expansion failure.
They haven't moved anywhere yet.
The Ballarat/Bendigo thing IMO is a winner, being just North of Melbourne.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 12:34 pm
by Beaussie
cos789 wrote:NSWAFL wrote:The only time they were seriously looking at establishing themselves was in Sydney. They have been Melbourne based since James Brayshaw took over and he has made it clear that they are staying in Melbourne.
Actually the ROOS have never committed to anywhere other than Melbourne.
IMO they'd been more open to re-locating something might have eventuated but they didn't.
Pretty pathetic attempt parafeel to suggest that the Roos are some sort expansion failure.
They haven't moved anywhere yet.
The Ballarat/Bendigo thing IMO is a winner, being just North of Melbourne.
Must confess I've long been a critic of the Roos, but I'm in agreement with you that the Ballarat/Bendigo proposal may just be what is required to secure their long term future. Good luck Roos.
If only the Melbourne Storm's future was as secure. Take away the News Ltd handouts and what's left? A move the the Central Coast perhaps.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:05 pm
by cos789
Beaussie wrote:Must confess I've long been a critic of the Roos, but I'm in agreement with you that the Ballarat/Bendigo proposal may just be what is required to secure their long term future. Good luck Roos.
It's the first time the Roos have said that they would like to move somewhere instead of just playing games somewhere.
It fits in with their name and location and is close enough for fans to travel easily either way.
Beaussie wrote:If only the Melbourne Storm's future was as secure. Take away the News Ltd handouts and what's left?
That's the big question. They have stalled in spite of having top players and top results.
When that imputus disappears, there could be an unholy implode.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 6:39 pm
by NSWAFL
Beaussie wrote:If only the Melbourne Storm's future was as secure. Take away the News Ltd handouts and what's left? A move the the Central Coast perhaps.
Nah I think the Bears will reform and play at Blue Tongue first. In the end I think it will be......
Wellington Storm!
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:49 am
by Beaussie
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:09 pm
by cos789
They could play the Perth Reds in the Clayton's Cup.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:28 am
by NSWAFL
No it has to be a three match series for a cup, involving the Adelaide Rams! :D
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:20 am
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:No it has to be a three match series for a cup, involving the Adelaide Rams! :D
yeahh
Storm Reds & Rams .... for the **** state cup .... I like it
