Talking Footy

Topper wrote:

He'll soil his pants most likely, NSWAFL! Good one!

you'd be in to have a sniff of that too wouldn't ya

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

beaussie said they had less members then GWS which is incorrect .. thats the only reason I said anything
& anyway

its 3K ahead a tsunami xman
a tsunami
thats impressive

You're the only one crapping on about GWS being a tsunami.

How anyone expects them to be even moderately popular for the first decade is beyond me.

ah no
flogball merkins jumping out of the woodwork to say as much ... as I've said .. maybe they should shut the F up as there'll be egg all ova their faces
& don't ask me how anyone could expect them to be anything but a train wreck ... yr sport is full of arrogant knobs .. start there maybe

prove it or lose it!

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

You're the only one crapping on about GWS being a tsunami.

How anyone expects them to be even moderately popular for the first decade is beyond me.

ah no
flogball merkins jumping out of the woodwork to say as much ... as I've said .. maybe they should shut the F up as there'll be egg all ova their faces
& don't ask me how anyone could expect them to be anything but a train wreck ... yr sport is full of arrogant knobs .. start there maybe

prove it or lose it!

have already
you asked for articles ... I posted them in another thread

end of story.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

ah no
flogball merkins jumping out of the woodwork to say as much ... as I've said .. maybe they should shut the F up as there'll be egg all ova their faces
& don't ask me how anyone could expect them to be anything but a train wreck ... yr sport is full of arrogant knobs .. start there maybe

prove it or lose it!

have already
you asked for articles ... I posted them in another thread

end of story.

I saw one from Dermott who never said the GWS would be a tsunami. Most of the article is paraphrasing by the Sydney media who just love code war articles.

Any others?

I can't wait to see the response here.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

prove it or lose it!

have already
you asked for articles ... I posted them in another thread

end of story.

I saw one from Dermott who never said the GWS would be a tsunami. Most of the article is paraphrasing by the Sydney media who just love code war articles.

Any others?

& dipperia ... diuppa ... dooper .... that guy

theres plenty more ... but thats enough for me to say they're talking them up .......don't really care if its not enough for you.
the sydney media get their quotes from loud mouthed flogballers & theres no shortage of them
the code wars are being flamed by the loud mouthed goats from your code
not the Sydney media

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

have already
you asked for articles ... I posted them in another thread

end of story.

I saw one from Dermott who never said the GWS would be a tsunami. Most of the article is paraphrasing by the Sydney media who just love code war articles.

Any others?

& dipperia ... diuppa ... dooper .... that guy

theres plenty more ... but thats enough for me to say they're talking them up .......don't really care if its not enough for you.
the sydney media get their quotes from loud mouthed flogballers & theres no shortage of them
the code wars are being flamed by the loud mouthed goats from your code
not the Sydney media

Show us the dipper article, and the "plenty more"......

Dermott clearly did not say the GWS would be a tsunami. So if dipper and these others didn't your statement will have been factless as usual.

If the Sydney media print it, Dave, the Sydney media are saying it. If they don't want to say it they wouldn't print it.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

have already
you asked for articles ... I posted them in another thread

end of story.

I saw one from Dermott who never said the GWS would be a tsunami. Most of the article is paraphrasing by the Sydney media who just love code war articles.

Any others?

& dipperia ... diuppa ... dooper .... that guy

theres plenty more ... but thats enough for me to say they're talking them up .......don't really care if its not enough for you.
the sydney media get their quotes from loud mouthed flogballers & theres no shortage of them
the code wars are being flamed by the loud mouthed goats from your code
not the Sydney media

Show us the dipper article, and the "plenty more"......

Dermott clearly did not say the GWS would be a tsunami. So if dipper and these others didn't your statement will have been factless as usual.[/quote]

I did .. it was with germy's if you'd care to open your eyes & take a look
& as I said
statement backed with said article

he may not have used that word , but in my opinion his meaning was clear & other terms being added .. thats me embellishing his dribble
statement proved.

Opinion proved you mean.

Lunch time!

All you've proved Dave is that you can imbellish dermotss statement. He nev said they'd take over like a tsunami! He said they would have an impact significant enough for the NRl to take notice.

Post dippers comments again please.

Any others?

So far your statement is looking very very thin!

NSWAFL wrote:

Opinion proved you mean.

Lunch time!

an opinion ... is a statement peanut.

Xman wrote:

All you've proved Dave is that you can imbellish dermotss statement. He nev said they'd take over like a tsunami! He said they would have an impact significant enough for the NRl to take notice.

Post dippers comments again please.

Any others?

So far your statement is looking very very thin!

yep ... thats what one does in a forum
take it one step further to encourage debate ....

& no
I won't post it again ... I've done that once ... you find it
K

As usual, Xman.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

All you've proved Dave is that you can imbellish dermotss statement. He nev said they'd take over like a tsunami! He said they would have an impact significant enough for the NRl to take notice.

Post dippers comments again please.

Any others?

So far your statement is looking very very thin!

yep ... thats what one does in a forum
take it one step further to encourage debate ....

& no
I won't post it again ... I've done that once ... you find it
K

Ok, so far you have dippers comments as proof. Dermott never said or inferred a tsunami.

I'd suggest you've failed unless you find others.