Talking Footy

NlolRL wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:13 pm

Terry wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:56 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:41 pm

like v like shows popularity. Accumulation totals show every other factor such as number of shows etc

SOOK!!!!!!!!!!!!

crying-cute-baby-image-collections (12).jpg

I've addressed the cumulative ratings, how about you explain why all 9 AFL finals outrated the NRL equivalent

Geez crybaby how many times does this have to be addressed. We're now comparing which sport had the most TV viewers and crowds, when combined, in 2017 in total. The unequivocal answer is Rugby League. It clearly means it is the most watched sport in Australia for 2017.

You can celebrate your odd win here and there but at the end of the day Rugby League is winner.

Now for gods sake climp back into the cradle, put the dummy back in, and have a rest over summer.

There is nothing worse than a bad, bad LOSER!!!!

The most popular sport on tv isn't decided by a four week finals count .
It's all year .
Who tunes in over & over for the whole season .

RL wins that easily .

A horse race isn't decided by comapsring which horse did what over the first 400
Or the middle
Or which horse was the fastest over the last 400

How hard is it to understand .
You had a good finals series
Well done
We had more viewers all year by a long way
So go on you can say it
Which way is easiest .
Most popular sport on tv ..RL
NO 1 viewing sport in Aust ..RL
Most ratings for the year..RL.

They all mean the same
RUGBY LEAGUE
GOLD GOLD GOLD
No1
No1
No1

Terry wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:31 pm

Geez crybaby how many times does this have to be addressed. We're now comparing which sport had the most TV viewers and crowds, when combined, in 2017 in total.

no, YOU'RE now comparing it, not me. Personally I couldnt give a shit about some meaningless tally

The unequivocal answer is Rugby League. It clearly means it is the most watched sport in Australia for 2017.

Even that is up for debate. 6 hours of RL is counted as 3 game ratings, while 6 hours of AFL gives only 2 game ratings. This makes the NRL look ahead but doesnt show that they were both equally watched

You can celebrate your odd win here and there but at the end of the day Rugby League is winner.

26-4 for H&A games, and 9-0 for finals is hardly an odd win

GREAT TV FIGURES just keep coming in for the World Cup>>

#SAMvTON 7mate *updated* 418k: Metro 274k (Syd 139k Mel 22k Bri 83k Ade 5k Per 26k) Regional 144k

ENGvLEB 7mate *updated* 417k: Metro 293k (Syd 154k Mel 33k Bri 74k Ade 9k Per 22k) Regional 125k

RLWC2017 #7mate #PNGvIRL Twilight 385k (Metro 241k Regional 144k)

Sun TV #RLWC2017 #7mate #FIJvWAL Night 332k (Metro 198k Regional 134k)

AFLcrap1 wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:36 pm

A horse race isn't decided by comapsring which horse did what over the first 400
Or the middle
Or which horse was the fastest over the last 400

you've used this shit example before. There are no awards for the first to 100m, 200m etc. Yet the networks are rewarded for winning single ratings periods. You dont think Ch7 cared they beat ch9 for 20 of 24 Friday nights? You dont think they'd be thrilled their winning ratings went for 50% longer than ch9's?

This BS about most watched for the year ignores the fact the AFL goes for 50% longer than the NRL. So out of a single NRL match rating 1m v a single AFL game rating 1m, which was the most watched sport?

NlolRL wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:09 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:36 pm

A horse race isn't decided by comapsring which horse did what over the first 400
Or the middle
Or which horse was the fastest over the last 400

you've used this shit example before. There are no awards for the first to 100m, 200m etc. Yet the networks are rewarded for winning single ratings periods. You dont think Ch7 cared they beat ch9 for 20 of 24 Friday nights? You dont think they'd be thrilled their winning ratings went for 50% longer than ch9's?

This BS about most watched for the year ignores the fact the AFL goes for 50% longer than the NRL. So out of a single NRL match rating 1m v a single AFL game rating 1m, which was the most watched sport?

Go away SOOK you,re becoming tiresome!!!

Terry wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:34 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:09 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:36 pm

A horse race isn't decided by comapsring which horse did what over the first 400
Or the middle
Or which horse was the fastest over the last 400

you've used this shit example before. There are no awards for the first to 100m, 200m etc. Yet the networks are rewarded for winning single ratings periods. You dont think Ch7 cared they beat ch9 for 20 of 24 Friday nights? You dont think they'd be thrilled their winning ratings went for 50% longer than ch9's?

This BS about most watched for the year ignores the fact the AFL goes for 50% longer than the NRL. So out of a single NRL match rating 1m v a single AFL game rating 1m, which was the most watched sport?

Go away SOOK you,re becoming tiresome!!!

NlolRL wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:42 pm

Terry wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:34 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:09 pm

you've used this shit example before. There are no awards for the first to 100m, 200m etc. Yet the networks are rewarded for winning single ratings periods. You dont think Ch7 cared they beat ch9 for 20 of 24 Friday nights? You dont think they'd be thrilled their winning ratings went for 50% longer than ch9's?

This BS about most watched for the year ignores the fact the AFL goes for 50% longer than the NRL. So out of a single NRL match rating 1m v a single AFL game rating 1m, which was the most watched sport?

Go away SOOK you,re becoming tiresome!!!

Wow!!!! I didn't know you are a girl lolololololololololololololololol.

Apologies for my rude posts. And toddle off now please loser!!!!

Seriously is there a condition added when you become a fumblefan that you have to be dumb ...
If your Victorian extra extra dumb .

More people watched RL
It is the most popular .end of story .
No but but buts will change that .

AFLcrap1 wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:16 pm

Seriously is there a condition added when you become a fumblefan that you have to be dumb ...
If your Victorian extra extra dumb .

More people watched RL
It is the most popular .end of story .
No but but buts will change that .

funny how neither of you answered my question.

Here's another: If the melbourne cup rated 1m today over 5 minutes, and the cricket 1m over 6 hours, which is more watched?

NlolRL wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:29 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:16 pm

Seriously is there a condition added when you become a fumblefan that you have to be dumb ...
If your Victorian extra extra dumb .

More people watched RL
It is the most popular .end of story .
No but but buts will change that .

funny how neither of you answered my question.

Here's another: If the melbourne cup rated 1m today over 5 minutes, and the cricket 1m over 6 hours, which is more watched?

Who cares!!!!! Just go away pal!!! You are sad and pathetic.

NlolRL wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:29 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:16 pm

Seriously is there a condition added when you become a fumblefan that you have to be dumb ...
If your Victorian extra extra dumb .

More people watched RL
It is the most popular .end of story .
No but but buts will change that .

funny how neither of you answered my question.

Here's another: If the melbourne cup rated 1m today over 5 minutes, and the cricket 1m over 6 hours, which is more watched?

Lol
We are comparing two football codes over a season
Both Over half a year .
Not a three minute race to a 6 hr game .

Jesus
The straws you're grasping at are getting worse

Terry wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:35 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:29 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:16 pm

Seriously is there a condition added when you become a fumblefan that you have to be dumb ...
If your Victorian extra extra dumb .

More people watched RL
It is the most popular .end of story .
No but but buts will change that .

funny how neither of you answered my question.

Here's another: If the melbourne cup rated 1m today over 5 minutes, and the cricket 1m over 6 hours, which is more watched?

Who cares!!!!! Just go away pal!!! You are sad and pathetic.

no engagement at all. Why am I not surprised?

AFLcrap1 wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:56 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:29 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:16 pm

Seriously is there a condition added when you become a fumblefan that you have to be dumb ...
If your Victorian extra extra dumb .

More people watched RL
It is the most popular .end of story .
No but but buts will change that .

funny how neither of you answered my question.

Here's another: If the melbourne cup rated 1m today over 5 minutes, and the cricket 1m over 6 hours, which is more watched?

Lol
We are comparing two football codes over a season
Both Over half a year .
Not a three minute race to a 6 hr game .

Jesus
The straws you're grasping at are getting worse

the question is entirely relevant because one game goes for 50% longer, which drastically effects the cumulative ratings

Oh dear .
Drastically

Lol,HOW