Fair enough .Xman wrote:He never said its all wonderful about crowds being down, so a lie confirmed
liar extraordinaire 
Because you made a claim that wasnt an opinion and was easy to prove or otherwiseAFLcrap1 wrote:Fair enough .Xman wrote:He never said its all wonderful about crowds being down, so a lie confirmed
You seem to be going by the strict rule of what is posted..Then why have you not done anything about Cwackhead.
Now go straighten out Cwackhead posting a lie about me .
& don't give me some bullshit about Opinions.As what I posted was my opinion..
Seems to be one rule for some & different rules for others
Xman wrote:Because you made a claim that wasnt an opinion and was easy to prove or otherwiseAFLcrap1 wrote:Fair enough .Xman wrote:He never said its all wonderful about crowds being down, so a lie confirmed
You seem to be going by the strict rule of what is posted..Then why have you not done anything about Cwackhead.
Now go straighten out Cwackhead posting a lie about me .
& don't give me some bullshit about Opinions.As what I posted was my opinion..
Seems to be one rule for some & different rules for others
Because you jump on any poster when they claim things you consider a lie.
He never said everything was wonderful. He said things were looking up as in they were promising
liar extraordinaire What are you on about? I disagreed with both of you yet didnt punish either of you. Where's the unfair treatment?AFLcrap1 wrote:Xman wrote:Because you made a claim that wasnt an opinion and was easy to prove or otherwiseAFLcrap1 wrote:Fair enough .Xman wrote:He never said its all wonderful about crowds being down, so a lie confirmed
You seem to be going by the strict rule of what is posted..Then why have you not done anything about Cwackhead.
Now go straighten out Cwackhead posting a lie about me .
& don't give me some bullshit about Opinions.As what I posted was my opinion..
Seems to be one rule for some & different rules for others
Because you jump on any poster when they claim things you consider a lie.
He never said everything was wonderful. He said things were looking up as in they were promising
The bias is there (IMO) for all to see.
its just crapper having a dummyspitXman wrote:What are you on about? I disagreed with both of you yet didnt punish either of you. Where's the unfair treatment?AFLcrap1 wrote:Xman wrote:Because you made a claim that wasnt an opinion and was easy to prove or otherwiseAFLcrap1 wrote:Fair enough .Xman wrote:He never said its all wonderful about crowds being down, so a lie confirmed
You seem to be going by the strict rule of what is posted..Then why have you not done anything about Cwackhead.
Now go straighten out Cwackhead posting a lie about me .
& don't give me some bullshit about Opinions.As what I posted was my opinion..
Seems to be one rule for some & different rules for others
Because you jump on any poster when they claim things you consider a lie.
He never said everything was wonderful. He said things were looking up as in they were promising
The bias is there (IMO) for all to see.
cry poor something like you bumsniffers love doing.AFLcrap1 wrote:Xman wrote:Because you made a claim that wasnt an opinion and was easy to prove or otherwiseAFLcrap1 wrote:Fair enough .Xman wrote:He never said its all wonderful about crowds being down, so a lie confirmed
You seem to be going by the strict rule of what is posted..Then why have you not done anything about Cwackhead.
Now go straighten out Cwackhead posting a lie about me .
& don't give me some bullshit about Opinions.As what I posted was my opinion..
Seems to be one rule for some & different rules for others
Because you jump on any poster when they claim things you consider a lie.
He never said everything was wonderful. He said things were looking up as in they were promising
The bias is there (IMO) for all to see.
> we made a $50m profit.
Hardly an achievement for a code that won't even expand into Brisbane :_<>pussycat wrote:Cry poor
that is your only come back. look at the whole overall revenue and finances between the AFL and NRL. the NRL gets raped. even with its revenue from the SOOpussycat wrote:Cry poor
The_Wookie wrote:No you spent less because 1) you had less to spend and 2) It was a stated goal by the ARLC to create a future fund, like one the AFL already has.pussycat wrote:We spent less because we had less debts & expenses to pay, Liabilities and keeping clubs afloat - A.D's $4m salary.
The AFL have already put funds aside for their futures fund. The NRL are yet to start. If they use their 50m for a futures fund their 2013 profit will be $0pussycat wrote:The_Wookie wrote:No you spent less because 1) you had less to spend and 2) It was a stated goal by the ARLC to create a future fund, like one the AFL already has.pussycat wrote:We spent less because we had less debts & expenses to pay, Liabilities and keeping clubs afloat - A.D's $4m salary.
The one that has't been added to since it was establlished in 2010and 1011 seassons. Hardly relevant when discussing reasons for there modest profit in 2014.
