As if your opinion is valid.Raiderdave wrote:sure they did shitheadNRLCrap1 wrote:They packed out the majority of venues, .
sure![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And Swans could knock you out in ten seconds.
As if your opinion is valid.Raiderdave wrote:sure they did shitheadNRLCrap1 wrote:They packed out the majority of venues, .
sure![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
NRLCrap1 wrote:Raiderdave wrote:sure they did shitheadNRLCrap1 wrote:They packed out the majority of venues, .
sure![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And Swans could knock you out in ten seconds.
Keep thinking that, Dave. It's not true and you are unable to comprehend the fact.Raiderdave wrote:NRLCrap1 wrote:Raiderdave wrote:sure they did shitheadNRLCrap1 wrote:They packed out the majority of venues, .
sure![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And Swans could knock you out in ten seconds.
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<>
Like most fumblers
he couldn't knock the skin off a custard![]()
![]()
![]()
NRLCrap1 wrote:Ignorant goose. International AFL is big and don't you forget it!
the stupidity....NRLCrap1 wrote:Crowds don't mean squat.
If any consolation I think crowds in NRL over time will continue growing - I still believe both codes can co-existpHyR3 wrote:So what's your point, that NRL crowds should be bigger like AFL crowds are? Well i've said a million times NRL = better on tv, AFL = better at the ground. Thus, AFL crowds > nrl crowds. So what's your point?
NO! AFL MUST DIE LIKE THE SCUM IT IS! wait...hold on. i'm not raiderdave.....Swans4ever wrote:If any consolation I think crowds in NRL over time will continue growing - I still believe both codes can co-existpHyR3 wrote:So what's your point, that NRL crowds should be bigger like AFL crowds are? Well i've said a million times NRL = better on tv, AFL = better at the ground. Thus, AFL crowds > nrl crowds. So what's your point?
NRLCrap1 wrote:Ignorant goose. International AFL is big and don't you forget it!
the stupidity....NRLCrap1 wrote:Crowds don't mean squat.
Errr, do you know the meaning of "premier".pHyR3 wrote:I think Soccer, AFL, NRL will be the premier codes in 50 years with union and cricket consumed by them largely.
Yeah think Union is in for hard times with kissing 19 mil over last year on player payments - although I'm not completely ontop of what the issue is about - biggest problem for them is profile, if they keep being uncompetitive the code will sufferpHyR3 wrote:NO! AFL MUST DIE LIKE THE SCUM IT IS! wait...hold on. i'm not raiderdave.....Swans4ever wrote:If any consolation I think crowds in NRL over time will continue growing - I still believe both codes can co-existpHyR3 wrote:So what's your point, that NRL crowds should be bigger like AFL crowds are? Well i've said a million times NRL = better on tv, AFL = better at the ground. Thus, AFL crowds > nrl crowds. So what's your point?
haha, yea they can and will. For sure. I think Soccer, AFL, NRL will be the premier codes in 50 years with union and cricket consumed by them largely.
IMO it's extremely hard to look into the crystal ball except the immediate future.Swans4ever wrote:Yeah think Union is in for hard times with kissing 19 mil over last year on player payments - although I'm not completely ontop of what the issue is about - biggest problem for them is profile, if they keep being uncompetitive the code will suffer
cos789 wrote:IMO it's extremely hard to look into the crystal ball except the immediate future.Swans4ever wrote:Yeah think Union is in for hard times with kissing 19 mil over last year on player payments - although I'm not completely ontop of what the issue is about - biggest problem for them is profile, if they keep being uncompetitive the code will suffer
RU has the strength of being Internationally based and spread across across Australia.
RL is still concentrated largely in Sydney.
i think your spot on with the cricket, its in big trouble, at all levels, aside from the t20 stuff, the tests & odi's are in big trouble, i was reading the participation at junior & amateur levels are down & the state system isnt producing the talent like it once use to. Union's popularity depends on how the national team goes but it does have a strong presents in the Private schools.pHyR3 wrote:NO! AFL MUST DIE LIKE THE SCUM IT IS! wait...hold on. i'm not raiderdave.....Swans4ever wrote:If any consolation I think crowds in NRL over time will continue growing - I still believe both codes can co-existpHyR3 wrote:So what's your point, that NRL crowds should be bigger like AFL crowds are? Well i've said a million times NRL = better on tv, AFL = better at the ground. Thus, AFL crowds > nrl crowds. So what's your point?
haha, yea they can and will. For sure. I think Soccer, AFL, NRL will be the premier codes in 50 years with union and cricket consumed by them largely.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 4 guests