

When nRL games clash on TV (which rarely ever happens) the impact it has on ratings is quite substantial.
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
Stewie wrote:Of course it's the poor low rating Raiders who are relegated to the Speed channel for their match this Saturday night!![]()
When nRL games clash on TV (which rarely ever happens) the impact it has on ratings is quite substantial.
Phelpsy wrote:http://m.smh.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/swans- ... -y4r5.html
Found this ... As can be seen crowds seem to fluctuate but as can be seen compared to when they started averages have certainly increased with natural variance over the years .
And 7 years ago they won the GF. Surprise surpriseRaiderdave wrote:Phelpsy wrote:http://m.smh.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/swans- ... -y4r5.html
Found this ... As can be seen crowds seem to fluctuate but as can be seen compared to when they started averages have certainly increased with natural variance over the years .
the fluctuation for the last 7 seasons .... has been down
thats called ... decline
end of
Speed ratings often are below 100k, so yes I am confident, besides, another 100k+ watched on 7 in Adelaide and 44k in Sydney on 7mate. Raiders ratings have been pretty bad so far this year, with only just over 200k watching on a stand alone Sunday night.Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Of course it's the poor low rating Raiders who are relegated to the Speed channel for their match this Saturday night!![]()
When nRL games clash on TV (which rarely ever happens) the impact it has on ratings is quite substantial.
hmmmm
lets see if we can outrate on pay tv the port shatmeundies game against the midgets last week
as you point out we're sharing the time slot with the top of the table Souths V Storm game so its a fair fight
the figure to beat ?
114K
I'm confident spewie
are you ?
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
Xman wrote:And 7 years ago they won the GF. Surprise surpriseRaiderdave wrote:Phelpsy wrote:http://m.smh.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/swans- ... -y4r5.html
Found this ... As can be seen crowds seem to fluctuate but as can be seen compared to when they started averages have certainly increased with natural variance over the years .
the fluctuation for the last 7 seasons .... has been down
thats called ... decline
end of
stand alone ?Stewie wrote:Raiders ratings have been pretty bad so far this year, with only just over 200k watching on a stand alone Sunday night.Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Of course it's the poor low rating Raiders who are relegated to the Speed channel for their match this Saturday night!![]()
When nRL games clash on TV (which rarely ever happens) the impact it has on ratings is quite substantial.
hmmmm
lets see if we can outrate on pay tv the port shatmeundies game against the midgets last week
as you point out we're sharing the time slot with the top of the table Souths V Storm game so its a fair fight
the figure to beat ?
114K
I'm confident spewie
are you ?
so you had 2 mediums ... pay & fta covering it ehbesides, another 100k+ watched on 7 in Adelaide and 44k in Sydney on 7mate
Stand alone nRL match you fucking inbredRaiderdave wrote:stand alone ?Stewie wrote:Raiders ratings have been pretty bad so far this year, with only just over 200k watching on a stand alone Sunday night.Raiderdave wrote:
hmmmm
lets see if we can outrate on pay tv the port shatmeundies game against the midgets last week
as you point out we're sharing the time slot with the top of the table Souths V Storm game so its a fair fight
the figure to beat ?
114K
I'm confident spewie
are you ?
yes .. there was no news on, no singing shows on , cooking shows on ... nothing that could have taken any FTA ratings away from the NRL game was there ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
.. cockhead
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
i know what you ment you thick fuck stickStewie wrote:Stand alone nRL match you fucking inbredRaiderdave wrote:stand alone ?Stewie wrote:Raiders ratings have been pretty bad so far this year, with only just over 200k watching on a stand alone Sunday night.
yes .. there was no news on, no singing shows on , cooking shows on ... nothing that could have taken any FTA ratings away from the NRL game was there ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
.. cockhead
Bullshit. Monday night games are up against big FTA shows as well, yet regularly rate over 300k. The small ratings for the Raiders are exactly why they are never on Channel 9, because they don't want the low ratings that the arse Raiders bring.Raiderdave wrote:i know what you ment you thick fuck stickStewie wrote:Stand alone nRL match you fucking inbredRaiderdave wrote:stand alone ?
yes .. there was no news on, no singing shows on , cooking shows on ... nothing that could have taken any FTA ratings away from the NRL game was there ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
.. cockhead
at 6.30pm the game was up against a pretty busy time on FTA with all the heavy weight ratings shows up against it .... thats why it only attracted 200K you jibbering tool![]()
![]()
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
excuses excuses Raiderdave!Raiderdave wrote:i know what you ment you thick fuck stickStewie wrote:Stand alone nRL match you fucking inbredRaiderdave wrote:stand alone ?
yes .. there was no news on, no singing shows on , cooking shows on ... nothing that could have taken any FTA ratings away from the NRL game was there ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
.. cockhead
at 6.30pm the game was up against a pretty busy time on FTA with all the heavy weight ratings shows up against it .... thats why it only attracted 200K you jibbering tool![]()
![]()
adamj1300 wrote:a bunch of big faties trying to loose weight, for inspiration for your self!Raiderdave wrote:i know what you ment you thick fuck stickStewie wrote:Stand alone nRL match you fucking inbred
at 6.30pm the game was up against a pretty busy time on FTA with all the heavy weight ratings shows up against it .... thats why it only attracted 200K you jibbering tool![]()
![]()
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 7 guests