but but you call it the they both failed due to lack of interestRaiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:If the nRL were to expand and place a team in both Perth and Adelaide, its average crowd would decline too.
but but but![]()
![]()

but but you call it the they both failed due to lack of interestRaiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:If the nRL were to expand and place a team in both Perth and Adelaide, its average crowd would decline too.
but but but![]()
![]()
adamj1300 wrote:but but you call it the they both failed due to lack of interestRaiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:If the nRL were to expand and place a team in both Perth and Adelaide, its average crowd would decline too.
but but but![]()
![]()
This. The nRL have just completely given up on Adelaide now. The interest for poor bogan's rugby just isn't there.adamj1300 wrote:but but you call it the they both failed due to lack of interestRaiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:If the nRL were to expand and place a team in both Perth and Adelaide, its average crowd would decline too.
but but but![]()
![]()
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
Stewie wrote:
This.
but but you call it the they both failed due to lack of interest
If you were smart enough you would have known what he was meant to say.Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:This.but but you call it the they both failed due to lack of interest
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Typical of a ****** like spewie, the above sentence doesn't even make sense
& his reply to this illegible nonsense
This
![]()
![]()
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
but you call it the they both failed due to lack of interestStewie wrote:If the nRL were to expand and place a team in both Perth and Adelaide, its average crowd would decline too.
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
I heard it called a blockbuster on LU..........maybe they meant as busy as a blockbuster video storeStewie wrote:Only 25,068 at the Can'terbury v Eels game tonight at ANZ. I thought the game which featured two clubs that will apparently be bigger than Collingwood was going to get a huge crowd? That's what all the nRL fans were saying anyway.
Xman wrote:I heard it called a blockbuster on LU..........maybe they meant as busy as a blockbuster video storeStewie wrote:Only 25,068 at the Can'terbury v Eels game tonight at ANZ. I thought the game which featured two clubs that will apparently be bigger than Collingwood was going to get a huge crowd? That's what all the nRL fans were saying anyway.
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
Xman wrote:13k for the NRL last night, almost half the AFLs GF practice match!![]()
Xman wrote:I heard it called a blockbuster on LU..........maybe they meant as busy as a blockbuster video storeStewie wrote:Only 25,068 at the Can'terbury v Eels game tonight at ANZ. I thought the game which featured two clubs that will apparently be bigger than Collingwood was going to get a huge crowd? That's what all the nRL fans were saying anyway.
Here's the difference Dave, no AFL supporter calls the preseason GF a blockbuster.Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:I heard it called a blockbuster on LU..........maybe they meant as busy as a blockbuster video storeStewie wrote:Only 25,068 at the Can'terbury v Eels game tonight at ANZ. I thought the game which featured two clubs that will apparently be bigger than Collingwood was going to get a huge crowd? That's what all the nRL fans were saying anyway.
surely a Grand Final is a blockbuster ?
yet an NRL premiership match ... on a THursday night
attracts more fans at the game
& about 1 Million more veiwers on TV
![]()
![]()
![]()
one team for a country of 4m =D> =D>Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:13k for the NRL last night, almost half the AFLs GF practice match!![]()
& 33K last night
33% more then a VFL Grand Final ... in a city thats not even considerd a Rugby League town ( Auckland)
![]()
![]()
![]()
NRL.... Killing it
VFL..hmmmmm , not so much
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 11 guests