NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

NRL, State of Origin and International football TV ratings and discussion.
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Raiderdave »

piesman2011 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
that I extrapolated from the SMH.


the Only thing you extrapolate .. is shit
from one end of your posts to the other

RL whopped .... whupped ... smashed ... Victorian Rules & its as plain as day this occured in 2012
the whining
crying
feeting stamping

from singletballers ... is some of the funniest .. & saddest ... stuff one will read
they just cannot accept reality
& their delusion is quite astounding

RL.. Australias most watched sport :cool:

Someone else who has no clue when it comes to numbers. When you learn to add up to 5 come back and talk some stats with me.

RL 131 Million veiwers on TV in Aust
flogball ... less

aint no adding up required d head :wink:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
piesman2011
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 2306
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am
Team: Collingwood
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by piesman2011 »

Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

the Only thing you extrapolate .. is shit
from one end of your posts to the other

RL whopped .... whupped ... smashed ... Victorian Rules & its as plain as day this occured in 2012
the whining
crying
feeting stamping

from singletballers ... is some of the funniest .. & saddest ... stuff one will read
they just cannot accept reality
& their delusion is quite astounding

RL.. Australias most watched sport :cool:

Someone else who has no clue when it comes to numbers. When you learn to add up to 5 come back and talk some stats with me.

RL 131 Million veiwers on TV in Aust
flogball ... less

aint no adding up required d head :wink:

Then present a source to back it up.
pookus
Seniors
Seniors
Reactions:
Posts: 460
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:24 pm
Team: North Melbourne
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by pookus »

Raiderdave wrote:
pookus wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Wow the but butting is starting to get heavy now dave...................... :lol: :lol: :lol:

The AFL offered the networks a extra game and we still get more TV money, less hours on Tele and less games and we are getting more TV money who would have thought... =D>
yeah eels

22 extra games since 2010 ..... & STILL less coin


8-[


#-o


:lol: :lol: :lol:
What an NRL apologist fuckwit you are Dave.Here is your pissant little club dying for exposure being reamed by the worst coverage deal ever.But you got close(reality is you got less in Australia and gave a whole lot more).What fukn idiot would argue the virtues of there own club being considered irrelavent by the competition they help uphold.Your a fool Dave.

Dying for exposure cockhead ?
they announced a 3.4 Million dollar profit for 2012

meanwhile theres some vicky kicky clubs who had every game shown on FTA .. & they posted multi million dollar losses

they laugh at our TV exposure

we laugh at their bank account balances :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:[/quote]

Just shows you what a fool you are Dave.Do you barrack for the bottom line or your club.I couldnt give a shit about the clubs finances all I know is noone supports your pissant club.They might play their pokies but they couldnt give a shit about the football.How could they they never see them. Nrl apologist fool.Thank you sir may I have another.Canberra most insignificant professional football franchise in Australia[/quote]

you're the one suggesting we're dying because of lack of exposure you utter knob
exposure meaning a stronger bottom line through increased sponsorship ... membership etc
well the extra 3 Million a year we get from the TV money straight up will more then cover this , & we can make a case direct to the NRL for more then the standard amount based on our lack of FTA coverage

we'd love a better deal on TV
but is it essential for our survival .... well I think I've shown its not & its a great testiment to what a well run club the Raiders are.

I mean
imagine some of the Fuckstick clubs in the VFL .. Like North Melb ... Poort Poweroutage & the Paddle Pop Wions & many many others
surviving on the coverage the raiders get ?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
those multi million dollar losses would be in the tens of millions...... eh *********** ? :wink:[/quote]

So what your saying apologist cockhead is that you do well without the support of the NRL. Yet you jump up and down saying how great they are and what a fine deal they have done.What have they done for your club Dave. They dont care about you because you are insignificant simple.What you are is a pokie venue that fields a football club .Pokie operati0ons come first because without them you wouldnt exsist.If it come down to community support youd be long gone.North and port are held together with members,tradition and football.Just i must admit but both have been there for over a hundred years.Canberra will never see such a legacy because they will go when the pokies do. Your football club is like your town souless
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Raiderdave »

piesman2011 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:

Someone else who has no clue when it comes to numbers. When you learn to add up to 5 come back and talk some stats with me.

RL 131 Million veiwers on TV in Aust
flogball ... less

aint no adding up required d head :wink:

Then present a source to back it up.
countless media articles
lets go with them shall we :wink:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Raiderdave »

pookus wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
pookus wrote:
Wow the but butting is starting to get heavy now dave...................... :lol: :lol: :lol:

The AFL offered the networks a extra game and we still get more TV money, less hours on Tele and less games and we are getting more TV money who would have thought... =D>
yeah eels

22 extra games since 2010 ..... & STILL less coin


8-[


#-o


:lol: :lol: :lol:
What an NRL apologist fuckwit you are Dave.Here is your pissant little club dying for exposure being reamed by the worst coverage deal ever.But you got close(reality is you got less in Australia and gave a whole lot more).What fukn idiot would argue the virtues of there own club being considered irrelavent by the competition they help uphold.Your a fool Dave.

Dying for exposure cockhead ?
they announced a 3.4 Million dollar profit for 2012

meanwhile theres some vicky kicky clubs who had every game shown on FTA .. & they posted multi million dollar losses

they laugh at our TV exposure

we laugh at their bank account balances :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:[/quote]

Just shows you what a fool you are Dave.Do you barrack for the bottom line or your club.I couldnt give a shit about the clubs finances all I know is noone supports your pissant club.They might play their pokies but they couldnt give a shit about the football.How could they they never see them. Nrl apologist fool.Thank you sir may I have another.Canberra most insignificant professional football franchise in Australia[/quote]

you're the one suggesting we're dying because of lack of exposure you utter knob
exposure meaning a stronger bottom line through increased sponsorship ... membership etc
well the extra 3 Million a year we get from the TV money straight up will more then cover this , & we can make a case direct to the NRL for more then the standard amount based on our lack of FTA coverage

we'd love a better deal on TV
but is it essential for our survival .... well I think I've shown its not & its a great testiment to what a well run club the Raiders are.

I mean
imagine some of the Fuckstick clubs in the VFL .. Like North Melb ... Poort Poweroutage & the Paddle Pop Wions & many many others
surviving on the coverage the raiders get ?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
those multi million dollar losses would be in the tens of millions...... eh *********** ? :wink:[/quote]

So what your saying apologist cockhead is that you do well without the support of the NRL. Yet you jump up and down saying how great they are and what a fine deal they have done.What have they done for your club Dave. They dont care about you because you are insignificant simple.What you are is a pokie venue that fields a football club .Pokie operati0ons come first because without them you wouldnt exsist.If it come down to community support youd be long gone.North and port are held together with members,tradition and football.Just i must admit but both have been there for over a hundred years.Canberra will never see such a legacy because they will go when the pokies do. Your football club is like your town souless[/quote]

:lol: :lol:
oh dear .... puss covered poo or whateva yr name is
without the support of the NRL

a 7 Million a year grant is no support eh .... :lol: :lol:

& where have you ever bagged the VFL in these pages you utter hypocrite fuckwit
the same organisation that

allows some clubs to get more the draft picks
allows others to spend more in the salary cap then others
manipulates the draw keeping big Melb clubs playing in Melb.... & the smaller Melb Clubs to be on the road more

it is so uneven .. there are soooo many leg ups for some clubs
its hilarious

the VFL is a contrived load of bollocks
& its little cheerleaders in here ... like you ... are too fucking stupid to even notice let alone dare complain

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Gimme a V
Gimme a F
Gimme an L

yaaahhhhhhhhhhh VFL :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
pookus
Seniors
Seniors
Reactions:
Posts: 460
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:24 pm
Team: North Melbourne
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by pookus »

Raiderdave wrote:
pookus wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Wow the but butting is starting to get heavy now dave...................... :lol: :lol: :lol:

The AFL offered the networks a extra game and we still get more TV money, less hours on Tele and less games and we are getting more TV money who would have thought... =D>
yeah eels

22 extra games since 2010 ..... & STILL less coin


8-[


#-o


:lol: :lol: :lol:
What an NRL apologist fuckwit you are Dave.Here is your pissant little club dying for exposure being reamed by the worst coverage deal ever.But you got close(reality is you got less in Australia and gave a whole lot more).What fukn idiot would argue the virtues of there own club being considered irrelavent by the competition they help uphold.Your a fool Dave.

Dying for exposure cockhead ?
they announced a 3.4 Million dollar profit for 2012

meanwhile theres some vicky kicky clubs who had every game shown on FTA .. & they posted multi million dollar losses

they laugh at our TV exposure

we laugh at their bank account balances :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:[/quote]

Just shows you what a fool you are Dave.Do you barrack for the bottom line or your club.I couldnt give a shit about the clubs finances all I know is noone supports your pissant club.They might play their pokies but they couldnt give a shit about the football.How could they they never see them. Nrl apologist fool.Thank you sir may I have another.Canberra most insignificant professional football franchise in Australia[/quote]

you're the one suggesting we're dying because of lack of exposure you utter knob
exposure meaning a stronger bottom line through increased sponsorship ... membership etc
well the extra 3 Million a year we get from the TV money straight up will more then cover this , & we can make a case direct to the NRL for more then the standard amount based on our lack of FTA coverage

we'd love a better deal on TV
but is it essential for our survival .... well I think I've shown its not & its a great testiment to what a well run club the Raiders are.

I mean
imagine some of the Fuckstick clubs in the VFL .. Like North Melb ... Poort Poweroutage & the Paddle Pop Wions & many many others
surviving on the coverage the raiders get ?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
those multi million dollar losses would be in the tens of millions...... eh *********** ? :wink:[/quote]

So what your saying apologist cockhead is that you do well without the support of the NRL. Yet you jump up and down saying how great they are and what a fine deal they have done.What have they done for your club Dave. They dont care about you because you are insignificant simple.What you are is a pokie venue that fields a football club .Pokie operati0ons come first because without them you wouldnt exsist.If it come down to community support youd be long gone.North and port are held together with members,tradition and football.Just i must admit but both have been there for over a hundred years.Canberra will never see such a legacy because they will go when the pokies do. Your football club is like your town souless[/quote]

:lol: :lol:
oh dear .... puss covered poo or whateva yr name is
without the support of the NRL

a 7 Million a year grant is no support eh .... :lol: :lol:

& where have you ever bagged the VFL in these pages you utter hypocrite fuckwit
the same organisation that

allows some clubs to get more the draft picks
allows others to spend more in the salary cap then others
manipulates the draw keeping big Melb clubs playing in Melb.... & the smaller Melb Clubs to be on the road more

it is so uneven .. there are soooo many leg ups for some clubs
its hilarious

the VFL is a contrived load of bollocks
& its little cheerleaders in here ... like you ... are too fucking stupid to even notice let alone dare complain

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Gimme a V
Gimme a F
Gimme an L

yaaahhhhhhhhhhh VFL :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:[/quote]

So your club operates in a system that sees them get the same pissy distribution as every other club yet they have 1 free to air game.Real fair dickhead.Cant you see what a NRL stooge you are.If things were even id agree but your draw is the most uneven manipulated piece of crap ever.Brisbane on every Friday tells you that.And trust me straight Dave if my club got treated like your insignificant club gets treated then the AFL and I would be at war. But not straight Raider"thank you sir can I have another"Dave
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Raiderdave »

pookus wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
pookus wrote:
Wow the but butting is starting to get heavy now dave...................... :lol: :lol: :lol:

The AFL offered the networks a extra game and we still get more TV money, less hours on Tele and less games and we are getting more TV money who would have thought... =D>
yeah eels

22 extra games since 2010 ..... & STILL less coin


8-[


#-o


:lol: :lol: :lol:
What an NRL apologist fuckwit you are Dave.Here is your pissant little club dying for exposure being reamed by the worst coverage deal ever.But you got close(reality is you got less in Australia and gave a whole lot more).What fukn idiot would argue the virtues of there own club being considered irrelavent by the competition they help uphold.Your a fool Dave.

Dying for exposure cockhead ?
they announced a 3.4 Million dollar profit for 2012

meanwhile theres some vicky kicky clubs who had every game shown on FTA .. & they posted multi million dollar losses

they laugh at our TV exposure

we laugh at their bank account balances :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:[/quote]

Just shows you what a fool you are Dave.Do you barrack for the bottom line or your club.I couldnt give a shit about the clubs finances all I know is noone supports your pissant club.They might play their pokies but they couldnt give a shit about the football.How could they they never see them. Nrl apologist fool.Thank you sir may I have another.Canberra most insignificant professional football franchise in Australia[/quote]

you're the one suggesting we're dying because of lack of exposure you utter knob
exposure meaning a stronger bottom line through increased sponsorship ... membership etc
well the extra 3 Million a year we get from the TV money straight up will more then cover this , & we can make a case direct to the NRL for more then the standard amount based on our lack of FTA coverage

we'd love a better deal on TV
but is it essential for our survival .... well I think I've shown its not & its a great testiment to what a well run club the Raiders are.

I mean
imagine some of the Fuckstick clubs in the VFL .. Like North Melb ... Poort Poweroutage & the Paddle Pop Wions & many many others
surviving on the coverage the raiders get ?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
those multi million dollar losses would be in the tens of millions...... eh *********** ? :wink:[/quote]

So what your saying apologist cockhead is that you do well without the support of the NRL. Yet you jump up and down saying how great they are and what a fine deal they have done.What have they done for your club Dave. They dont care about you because you are insignificant simple.What you are is a pokie venue that fields a football club .Pokie operati0ons come first because without them you wouldnt exsist.If it come down to community support youd be long gone.North and port are held together with members,tradition and football.Just i must admit but both have been there for over a hundred years.Canberra will never see such a legacy because they will go when the pokies do. Your football club is like your town souless[/quote]

:lol: :lol:
oh dear .... puss covered poo or whateva yr name is
without the support of the NRL

a 7 Million a year grant is no support eh .... :lol: :lol:

& where have you ever bagged the VFL in these pages you utter hypocrite fuckwit
the same organisation that

allows some clubs to get more the draft picks
allows others to spend more in the salary cap then others
manipulates the draw keeping big Melb clubs playing in Melb.... & the smaller Melb Clubs to be on the road more

it is so uneven .. there are soooo many leg ups for some clubs
its hilarious

the VFL is a contrived load of bollocks
& its little cheerleaders in here ... like you ... are too fucking stupid to even notice let alone dare complain

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Gimme a V
Gimme a F
Gimme an L

yaaahhhhhhhhhhh VFL :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:[/quote]

So your club operates in a system that sees them get the same pissy distribution as every other club yet they have 1 free to air game.Real fair dickhead.Cant you see what a NRL stooge you are.If things were even id agree but your draw is the most uneven manipulated piece of crap ever.Brisbane on every Friday tells you that.And trust me straight Dave if my club got treated like your insignificant club gets treated then the AFL and I would be at war. But not straight Raider"thank you sir can I have another"Dave[/quote]

reading an issue for you poohjabber ?

I said clubs can make submissions to the NRL for extra funding based on things like but not limited too an unfair distribution of FTA games
the Raiders could recieve extra money due to be overlooked by Ch 9

the NRL... with its wheel barrows of dough ... will cover a clubs losses from any monies lost from sponsors etc due to an extremely unfair distribution of games on FTA ...........
sides like the Raiders .. Sharks .. & even the Storm will be compensated

sorry to dissapoint .. but its in hand :wink:

so don't worry about my club
&
how bout you protest ... that some VFL clubs get ridiculous draft preferences
that others are allowed to spend more then yours .. up to a million more a year
that your club is forced to travel more & gets more out of town clubs as home games
while others get to play a lot more games in Vic & against other big drawing Melb clubs

the VFL is orchestrated puke .. & you know it :wink:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
pookus
Seniors
Seniors
Reactions:
Posts: 460
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:24 pm
Team: North Melbourne
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by pookus »

Raiderdave wrote:
pookus wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Wow the but butting is starting to get heavy now dave...................... :lol: :lol: :lol:

The AFL offered the networks a extra game and we still get more TV money, less hours on Tele and less games and we are getting more TV money who would have thought... =D>
yeah eels

22 extra games since 2010 ..... & STILL less coin


8-[


#-o


:lol: :lol: :lol:
What an NRL apologist fuckwit you are Dave.Here is your pissant little club dying for exposure being reamed by the worst coverage deal ever.But you got close(reality is you got less in Australia and gave a whole lot more).What fukn idiot would argue the virtues of there own club being considered irrelavent by the competition they help uphold.Your a fool Dave.

Dying for exposure cockhead ?
they announced a 3.4 Million dollar profit for 2012

meanwhile theres some vicky kicky clubs who had every game shown on FTA .. & they posted multi million dollar losses

they laugh at our TV exposure

we laugh at their bank account balances :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:[/quote]

Just shows you what a fool you are Dave.Do you barrack for the bottom line or your club.I couldnt give a shit about the clubs finances all I know is noone supports your pissant club.They might play their pokies but they couldnt give a shit about the football.How could they they never see them. Nrl apologist fool.Thank you sir may I have another.Canberra most insignificant professional football franchise in Australia[/quote]

you're the one suggesting we're dying because of lack of exposure you utter knob
exposure meaning a stronger bottom line through increased sponsorship ... membership etc
well the extra 3 Million a year we get from the TV money straight up will more then cover this , & we can make a case direct to the NRL for more then the standard amount based on our lack of FTA coverage

we'd love a better deal on TV
but is it essential for our survival .... well I think I've shown its not & its a great testiment to what a well run club the Raiders are.

I mean
imagine some of the Fuckstick clubs in the VFL .. Like North Melb ... Poort Poweroutage & the Paddle Pop Wions & many many others
surviving on the coverage the raiders get ?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
those multi million dollar losses would be in the tens of millions...... eh *********** ? :wink:[/quote]

So what your saying apologist cockhead is that you do well without the support of the NRL. Yet you jump up and down saying how great they are and what a fine deal they have done.What have they done for your club Dave. They dont care about you because you are insignificant simple.What you are is a pokie venue that fields a football club .Pokie operati0ons come first because without them you wouldnt exsist.If it come down to community support youd be long gone.North and port are held together with members,tradition and football.Just i must admit but both have been there for over a hundred years.Canberra will never see such a legacy because they will go when the pokies do. Your football club is like your town souless[/quote]

:lol: :lol:
oh dear .... puss covered poo or whateva yr name is
without the support of the NRL

a 7 Million a year grant is no support eh .... :lol: :lol:

& where have you ever bagged the VFL in these pages you utter hypocrite fuckwit
the same organisation that

allows some clubs to get more the draft picks
allows others to spend more in the salary cap then others
manipulates the draw keeping big Melb clubs playing in Melb.... & the smaller Melb Clubs to be on the road more

it is so uneven .. there are soooo many leg ups for some clubs
its hilarious

the VFL is a contrived load of bollocks
& its little cheerleaders in here ... like you ... are too fucking stupid to even notice let alone dare complain

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Gimme a V
Gimme a F
Gimme an L

yaaahhhhhhhhhhh VFL :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:[/quote]

So your club operates in a system that sees them get the same pissy distribution as every other club yet they have 1 free to air game.Real fair dickhead.Cant you see what a NRL stooge you are.If things were even id agree but your draw is the most uneven manipulated piece of crap ever.Brisbane on every Friday tells you that.And trust me straight Dave if my club got treated like your insignificant club gets treated then the AFL and I would be at war. But not straight Raider"thank you sir can I have another"Dave[/quote]

reading an issue for you poohjabber ?

I said clubs can make submissions to the NRL for extra funding based on things like but not limited too an unfair distribution of FTA games
the Raiders could recieve extra money due to be overlooked by Ch 9

the NRL... with its wheel barrows of dough ... will cover a clubs losses from any monies lost from sponsors etc due to an extremely unfair distribution of games on FTA ...........
sides like the Raiders .. Sharks .. & even the Storm will be compensated

sorry to dissapoint .. but its in hand :wink:

so don't worry about my club
&
how bout you protest ... that some VFL clubs get ridiculous draft preferences
that others are allowed to spend more then yours .. up to a million more a year
that your club is forced to travel more & gets more out of town clubs as home games
while others get to play a lot more games in Vic & against other big drawing Melb clubs

the VFL is orchestrated puke .. & you know it :wink:[/quote]

This hasnt been sorted in your comp yet Dave just a good idea stolen from the AFL.Chances are it wont happen because of the self interested Sydney clubs but well see. Of course there are inequeties dave thats life but the AFL tries to fix them like signing a TV deal that gives everyone a chance at exposure unlike your comp who couldnt give a shit about poor ol insignificant canberra.
piesman2011
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 2306
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am
Team: Collingwood
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by piesman2011 »

Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

RL 131 Million veiwers on TV in Aust
flogball ... less

aint no adding up required d head :wink:

Then present a source to back it up.
countless media articles
lets go with them shall we :wink:
Show me a single source which has RL in front for 2012 and I will accept that its true. Until then you got nothing.
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Xman »

''Broadcast funding [including New Zealand television and a new media rights deal with Telstra] is just over $1.2 billion, and commercial revenue is about $800 million.

http://www.maroondahweekly.com.au/story ... man/?cs=12

Here it is guys! Its official! Straight from the horses mouth

AFL wins =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

:lol:
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
piesman2011
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 2306
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am
Team: Collingwood
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by piesman2011 »

Xman wrote:
''Broadcast funding [including New Zealand television and a new media rights deal with Telstra] is just over $1.2 billion, and commercial revenue is about $800 million.

http://www.maroondahweekly.com.au/story ... man/?cs=12

Here it is guys! Its official! Straight from the horses mouth

AFL wins =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

:lol:
So just over1.2 billion for all media rights (inc NZ and naming rights) Compared to a bit over 1.3 billion for AFL so is that final? I expect only silence or bullshit from raiderdave and eels.
User avatar
Drac
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 1019
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:14 pm
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Drac »

Xman wrote:
''Broadcast funding [including New Zealand television and a new media rights deal with Telstra] is just over $1.2 billion, and commercial revenue is about $800 million.

http://www.maroondahweekly.com.au/story ... man/?cs=12

Here it is guys! Its official! Straight from the horses mouth

AFL wins =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

:lol:
This is hilarious.
Raiderdave wrote:
perception is reality
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Raiderdave »

Xman wrote:
''Broadcast funding [including New Zealand television and a new media rights deal with Telstra] is just over $1.2 billion, and commercial revenue is about $800 million.

http://www.maroondahweekly.com.au/story ... man/?cs=12

Here it is guys! Its official! Straight from the horses mouth

AFL wins =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

:lol:

ah , poor ol marcus letting a load go in his pants .... again :lol: :lol: :lol:
John Wouldn't be including the revenue from the sharing arrangment with telstra for digital rights to non Telstra customers
as its unclear how much potential money the NRL could earn from this

but .. heaps .. would not be an over exaggeration

NRL ... No 1 for Media Rights in our fair land :cool:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Raiderdave »

piesman2011 wrote:
Xman wrote:
''Broadcast funding [including New Zealand television and a new media rights deal with Telstra] is just over $1.2 billion, and commercial revenue is about $800 million.

http://www.maroondahweekly.com.au/story ... man/?cs=12

Here it is guys! Its official! Straight from the horses mouth

AFL wins =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

:lol:
So just over1.2 billion for all media rights (inc NZ and naming rights) Compared to a bit over 1.3 billion for AFL so is that final? I expect only silence or bullshit from raiderdave and eels.
ah no
the VFL's is 1.253 Billion.... not 1.3 Billion you bilthering moron :lol: :lol: :lol:
the NRL's .... is more then this as I have explained above :cool:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
piesman2011
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 2306
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am
Team: Collingwood
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by piesman2011 »

Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
Xman wrote:
''Broadcast funding [including New Zealand television and a new media rights deal with Telstra] is just over $1.2 billion, and commercial revenue is about $800 million.

http://www.maroondahweekly.com.au/story ... man/?cs=12

Here it is guys! Its official! Straight from the horses mouth

AFL wins =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

:lol:
So just over1.2 billion for all media rights (inc NZ and naming rights) Compared to a bit over 1.3 billion for AFL so is that final? I expect only silence or bullshit from raiderdave and eels.
ah no
the VFL's is 1.253 Billion.... not 1.3 Billion you bilthering moron :lol: :lol: :lol:
the NRL's .... is more then this as I have explained above :cool:

Ah no the RL figure has radio and naming rights which just gets over 1.2 billion (probabaly includes estimated revenue for the sharing rights as well), So we have to include the radio and naming rights for the AFL as well. So AFL a bit over 1.3 billion compared to a bit over 1.2 billion. Give it up Dave you lost this one.
Post Reply