AT LEAST seven AFL clubs were named in a confidential briefing to competition chiefs by the Australian Crime Commission as being vulnerable to illicit drugs.Striker wrote:
No, 7 clubs were at risk of ilicit drugs, not PEDsStriker wrote:SEVEN CLUBS! Not one club. SEVEN CLUBS!
Read it again, this time with your eyes open.
Sure do, and only 2 clubs have been implicated in PEDsStriker wrote:ACC is investigating BOTH, douche!
Striker wrote:And illicit drugs aren't important according to the AFL and you. Get your head out of the sand!
PEDs compromise the entire competition. Its cheating, illicit drugs arent, theyre more about health, image, responsibility.How are illicit drugs cheating? They don't alter performance.Striker wrote:Illicit drugs compromise the entire comp! It's cheating as well!!
How is using illicit drugs cheating....come on. This requires explanationStriker wrote:It's about compromising the comp and affecting INTEGRITY! Cheats! Illicit Drugs = TANKING!!!! Well???
Yeah, they make you perform worse. How are illicit drugs assisting cheating?Striker wrote:Tanking is cheating! Illicit drugs compromise performance (your words).
2 + 2 = 4!!
So hang on, AFL clubs are taking ilicit drugs so they can tank.........Striker wrote:Perform worse = losing intentionally = TANKING!!
How far did you get at school, X? Did you even go??
