A penalty stopping them on winning, not a ban on playing!Striker wrote:They played for nothing and no reward. A ban! If we played and were paid for it, where was our finals appearance?
X = no idea.
Question?
Re: Question?
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
-
ParraEelsNRL
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: Question?
They won matches, nearly all of them actually, they were not banned from winning at all.
If they were banned from winning, why did the Tab and other places accept weekly bets on or against the Storm up until the finals?
If they were banned from winning, why did the Tab and other places accept weekly bets on or against the Storm up until the finals?
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
Re: Question?
ParraEelsNRL wrote:They won matches, nearly all of them actually, they were not banned from winning at all.
If they were banned from winning, why did the Tab and other places accept weekly bets on or against the Storm up until the finals?
what do get for winning? Premiership points dumbarse! King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
-
ParraEelsNRL
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: Question?
And that has nothing to do with what you stated.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.