NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

[Raiderdave]

According to RL supporters RL as a competition got a total of 133 million viewers (made up stats). Why dont you wait for them to put out a report before you assume. At this stage the AFL season came out about 10 million in front of the NRL season in OZ and that is all you can say. Im sure they will do a Game V Game comparison soon. Just for the record how many hours of viewing would the AFL competition be ahead as well? It would have to be at least 150 million viewer hours at the least. AFL the most watched (no denying it most hours watched) competition in the country by a long way.

Viewing hours means jack Pies........................cricket would rule the world if viewing hour meant anything to TV networks.

It is about how many eyeballs are on your code and the NRL is in front by a mile 147m which includes the NZ ratings for our NZ TV deal.

16 team comp NRL 147M, 2 hour broadcasts and 8 broadcasts a week
18 team comp AFL 123, 3 hour broadcasts and 13 broadcast a week

Our code is just more valuable get use to it boys, Game over...... =D> =D>

Oh and our TV deals are going to come out in front of your TV deal that is all she wrote let the fat lady sing..............

ah no. If youre looking for the most watched sporting program on TV the AFL has 123M people watching for a total of 3 hrs, while the NRL has 113M watching for only 2 hours.

What an absolute drubbing! AFL leading the way in everything =D>

hmmmm
so 369M vicky kicky veiwers are worth .... 250 million dollars to advertisers in Aust each year
&

266M RL veiwers are worth ................ the same


wow , what an absolute drubbing
Sthn bogans ..... who needs em eh ?

[Raiderdave]

And you are now starting to get desperate with the angle you are taking.

eels its like an Americas cup yacht race in here
this lot are changing tack every post

stick a fork in em
they're done

[piesman2011]

Still not one quote to back up your facts (sic). All assumptions about how much money the NRL made and assumptions about how many watched 200 games on TV. All that we do know is that the NRL got 1.025 billion + some from Telstra and they had about 114 million watching them on TV. The rest is your speculation twisting and turning with the only people convinced, already wearing tin hats.
The fact is that no one knows how much the NRL will make from their deal because they are not willing to tell anyone. If it was more then the AFL im sure they would have printed it, after all Testra was happy to tell everyone how much they got the AFL online rights for. So it must be the NRL which is stopping this deal from being public knowledge. At the same time the NRL is not realeasing any figures about how many people watched the sport of RL is OZ. If they got a lot more then 114 million im sure they would have released the figures (maybe they will soon). They at least should have said something by now. We only know through a newspaper article that the AFL got more then the NRL but the NRL havent said anything since then. All this silence tells you two things. That the NRL TV deal is smaller then the AFL deal and that the TV figures are less.

[Xman]

Viewing hours means jack Pies........................cricket would rule the world if viewing hour meant anything to TV networks.

It is about how many eyeballs are on your code and the NRL is in front by a mile 147m which includes the NZ ratings for our NZ TV deal.

16 team comp NRL 147M, 2 hour broadcasts and 8 broadcasts a week
18 team comp AFL 123, 3 hour broadcasts and 13 broadcast a week

Our code is just more valuable get use to it boys, Game over...... =D> =D>

Oh and our TV deals are going to come out in front of your TV deal that is all she wrote let the fat lady sing..............

ah no. If youre looking for the most watched sporting program on TV the AFL has 123M people watching for a total of 3 hrs, while the NRL has 113M watching for only 2 hours.

What an absolute drubbing! AFL leading the way in everything =D>

hmmmm
so 369M vicky kicky veiwers are worth .... 250 million dollars to advertisers in Aust each year
&

266M RL veiwers are worth ................ the same


wow , what an absolute drubbing
Sthn bogans ..... who needs em eh ?

According to you its 260m plus NZ

Add to that the NRL have 4 prime time games per week and the AFL only 3, plus NSW is the highest value advertising in Australia.

AFL, clearly the number 1 TV sport in Australia with a massive 369m viewer hours! =D> =D> =D> and this excludes many fox footy shows =D>

[Raiderdave]

Still not one quote to back up your facts (sic). All assumptions about how much money the NRL made and assumptions about how many watched 200 games on TV. All that we do know is that the NRL got 1.025 billion + some from Telstra and they had about 114 million watching them on TV. The rest is your speculation twisting and turning with the only people convinced, already wearing tin hats.
The fact is that no one knows how much the NRL will make from their deal because they are not willing to tell anyone. If it was more then the AFL im sure they would have printed it, after all Testra was happy to tell everyone how much they got the AFL online rights for. So it must be the NRL which is stopping this deal from being public knowledge. At the same time the NRL is not realeasing any figures about how many people watched the sport of RL is OZ. If they got a lot more then 114 million im sure they would have released the figures (maybe they will soon). They at least should have said something by now. We only know through a newspaper article that the AFL got more then the NRL but the NRL havent said anything since then. All this silence tells you two things. That the NRL TV deal is smaller then the AFL deal and that the TV figures are less.

how is it assumption about our TV ratings you dimwit
are you assuming the NRL rep season( I call it that now because all of these games are played by NRL players)
didn't attract 17 Million veiwers last year ... when we all know they did
every one of them has ratings published ... just try & challenge this number
I bet you can't D head

SOO X 3
RL tests X2 in April & Oct
City Country in April
All stars in Feb

17 million veiwers ... + 114 Million veiwers
131 Million veiwers ..... 8 million more then the VFL

end of

[Xman]

Still not one quote to back up your facts (sic). All assumptions about how much money the NRL made and assumptions about how many watched 200 games on TV. All that we do know is that the NRL got 1.025 billion + some from Telstra and they had about 114 million watching them on TV. The rest is your speculation twisting and turning with the only people convinced, already wearing tin hats.
The fact is that no one knows how much the NRL will make from their deal because they are not willing to tell anyone. If it was more then the AFL im sure they would have printed it, after all Testra was happy to tell everyone how much they got the AFL online rights for. So it must be the NRL which is stopping this deal from being public knowledge. At the same time the NRL is not realeasing any figures about how many people watched the sport of RL is OZ. If they got a lot more then 114 million im sure they would have released the figures (maybe they will soon). They at least should have said something by now. We only know through a newspaper article that the AFL got more then the NRL but the NRL havent said anything since then. All this silence tells you two things. That the NRL TV deal is smaller then the AFL deal and that the TV figures are less.

how is it assumption about our TV ratings you dimwit
are you assuming the NRL rep season( I call it that now because all of these games are played by NRL players)
didn't attract 17 Million veiwers last year ... when we all know they did
every one of them has ratings published ... just try & challenge this number
I bet you can't D head

SOO X 3
RL tests X2 in April & Oct
City Country in April
All stars in Feb

17 million veiwers ... + 114 Million veiwers
131 Million veiwers ..... 8 million more then the VFL

end of

Include legends games, preseason cup, brownlow, foxtel programs.....its the AFL beating RL.

Include the 50% longer running time and its a thrashing! AFL, number 1 TV sport in Australia =D>

[Raiderdave]

ah no. If youre looking for the most watched sporting program on TV the AFL has 123M people watching for a total of 3 hrs, while the NRL has 113M watching for only 2 hours.

What an absolute drubbing! AFL leading the way in everything =D>

hmmmm
so 369M vicky kicky veiwers are worth .... 250 million dollars to advertisers in Aust each year
&

266M RL veiwers are worth ................ the same


wow , what an absolute drubbing
Sthn bogans ..... who needs em eh ?

According to you its 260m plus NZ

Add to that the NRL have 4 prime time games per week and the AFL only 3, plus NSW is the highest value advertising in Australia.

AFL, clearly the number 1 TV sport in Australia with a massive 369m viewer hours! =D> =D> =D> and this excludes many fox footy shows =D>

oooh ... there we go
another tack

that makes 46 in this debate
& they're still well behind ....

when you consider the VFL now has 22 extra games broadcast since 2010
& now has WA & TAS regionals counted
& includes pay TV audiences on top of FTA
& every game is shown on FTA in a market somewhere in Aust... including many in all 5 at the same time

and they still are way ..... way behind

its truly amazing.
RL's dominance on TV is there for all to see

no wonder broadcasters paid what they have for it , for the next 5 years
RL .... KING

[Raiderdave]

Still not one quote to back up your facts (sic). All assumptions about how much money the NRL made and assumptions about how many watched 200 games on TV. All that we do know is that the NRL got 1.025 billion + some from Telstra and they had about 114 million watching them on TV. The rest is your speculation twisting and turning with the only people convinced, already wearing tin hats.
The fact is that no one knows how much the NRL will make from their deal because they are not willing to tell anyone. If it was more then the AFL im sure they would have printed it, after all Testra was happy to tell everyone how much they got the AFL online rights for. So it must be the NRL which is stopping this deal from being public knowledge. At the same time the NRL is not realeasing any figures about how many people watched the sport of RL is OZ. If they got a lot more then 114 million im sure they would have released the figures (maybe they will soon). They at least should have said something by now. We only know through a newspaper article that the AFL got more then the NRL but the NRL havent said anything since then. All this silence tells you two things. That the NRL TV deal is smaller then the AFL deal and that the TV figures are less.

how is it assumption about our TV ratings you dimwit
are you assuming the NRL rep season( I call it that now because all of these games are played by NRL players)
didn't attract 17 Million veiwers last year ... when we all know they did
every one of them has ratings published ... just try & challenge this number
I bet you can't D head

SOO X 3
RL tests X2 in April & Oct
City Country in April
All stars in Feb

17 million veiwers ... + 114 Million veiwers
131 Million veiwers ..... 8 million more then the VFL

end of

Include legends games, preseason cup, brownlow, foxtel programs.....its the AFL beating RL.

Include the 50% longer running time and its a thrashing! AFL, number 1 TV sport in Australia =D>

tack 47 people ....


preseason cup is included d head ....
& programs don't count , they aren't GAMES
& anyway ... do you think no one watches our non game ... programs on Fox

so....
whats next ..... veiwers watching sport on the news , when VFL stories are being shown ?
desperation overload from these clowns
F me

yr done
numb 2.... again

& as I've pointed out
RL seems to be increasing its dominance =D> =D> =D> =D>

[piesman2011]

Still not one quote to back up your facts (sic). All assumptions about how much money the NRL made and assumptions about how many watched 200 games on TV. All that we do know is that the NRL got 1.025 billion + some from Telstra and they had about 114 million watching them on TV. The rest is your speculation twisting and turning with the only people convinced, already wearing tin hats.
The fact is that no one knows how much the NRL will make from their deal because they are not willing to tell anyone. If it was more then the AFL im sure they would have printed it, after all Testra was happy to tell everyone how much they got the AFL online rights for. So it must be the NRL which is stopping this deal from being public knowledge. At the same time the NRL is not realeasing any figures about how many people watched the sport of RL is OZ. If they got a lot more then 114 million im sure they would have released the figures (maybe they will soon). They at least should have said something by now. We only know through a newspaper article that the AFL got more then the NRL but the NRL havent said anything since then. All this silence tells you two things. That the NRL TV deal is smaller then the AFL deal and that the TV figures are less.

how is it assumption about our TV ratings you dimwit
are you assuming the NRL rep season( I call it that now because all of these games are played by NRL players)
didn't attract 17 Million veiwers last year ... when we all know they did
every one of them has ratings published ... just try & challenge this number
I bet you can't D head

SOO X 3
RL tests X2 in April & Oct
City Country in April
All stars in Feb

17 million veiwers ... + 114 Million veiwers
131 Million veiwers ..... 8 million more then the VFL

end of

Include legends games, preseason cup, brownlow, foxtel programs.....its the AFL beating RL.

Include the 50% longer running time and its a thrashing! AFL, number 1 TV sport in Australia =D>

Not to mention the extra 3-4 million who actually went to the games

[Xman]

hmmmm
so 369M vicky kicky veiwers are worth .... 250 million dollars to advertisers in Aust each year
&

266M RL veiwers are worth ................ the same


wow , what an absolute drubbing
Sthn bogans ..... who needs em eh ?

According to you its 260m plus NZ

Add to that the NRL have 4 prime time games per week and the AFL only 3, plus NSW is the highest value advertising in Australia.

AFL, clearly the number 1 TV sport in Australia with a massive 369m viewer hours! =D> =D> =D> and this excludes many fox footy shows =D>

oooh ... there we go
another tack

that makes 46 in this debate
& they're still well behind ....

when you consider the VFL now has 22 extra games broadcast since 2010
& now has WA & TAS regionals counted
& includes pay TV audiences on top of FTA
& every game is shown on FTA in a market somewhere in Aust... including many in all 5 at the same time

and they still are way ..... way behind

its truly amazing.
RL's dominance on TV is there for all to see

no wonder broadcasters paid what they have for it , for the next 5 years
RL .... KING

The NRL have far more individual games shown in isolation on TV, by far!!! Probably close to 75 for the year.

How the hell are you THAT far behind? > >

[Raiderdave]

Still not one quote to back up your facts (sic). All assumptions about how much money the NRL made and assumptions about how many watched 200 games on TV. All that we do know is that the NRL got 1.025 billion + some from Telstra and they had about 114 million watching them on TV. The rest is your speculation twisting and turning with the only people convinced, already wearing tin hats.
The fact is that no one knows how much the NRL will make from their deal because they are not willing to tell anyone. If it was more then the AFL im sure they would have printed it, after all Testra was happy to tell everyone how much they got the AFL online rights for. So it must be the NRL which is stopping this deal from being public knowledge. At the same time the NRL is not realeasing any figures about how many people watched the sport of RL is OZ. If they got a lot more then 114 million im sure they would have released the figures (maybe they will soon). They at least should have said something by now. We only know through a newspaper article that the AFL got more then the NRL but the NRL havent said anything since then. All this silence tells you two things. That the NRL TV deal is smaller then the AFL deal and that the TV figures are less.

how is it assumption about our TV ratings you dimwit
are you assuming the NRL rep season( I call it that now because all of these games are played by NRL players)
didn't attract 17 Million veiwers last year ... when we all know they did
every one of them has ratings published ... just try & challenge this number
I bet you can't D head

SOO X 3
RL tests X2 in April & Oct
City Country in April
All stars in Feb

17 million veiwers ... + 114 Million veiwers
131 Million veiwers ..... 8 million more then the VFL

end of

Include the 50% longer running time =D>

a veiwer in the first hour .... is the same veiwer in the 3rd
he isn't 3 different people d head ....

[Raiderdave]

According to you its 260m plus NZ

Add to that the NRL have 4 prime time games per week and the AFL only 3, plus NSW is the highest value advertising in Australia.

AFL, clearly the number 1 TV sport in Australia with a massive 369m viewer hours! =D> =D> =D> and this excludes many fox footy shows =D>

oooh ... there we go
another tack

that makes 46 in this debate
& they're still well behind ....

when you consider the VFL now has 22 extra games broadcast since 2010
& now has WA & TAS regionals counted
& includes pay TV audiences on top of FTA
& every game is shown on FTA in a market somewhere in Aust... including many in all 5 at the same time

and they still are way ..... way behind

its truly amazing.
RL's dominance on TV is there for all to see

no wonder broadcasters paid what they have for it , for the next 5 years
RL .... KING

The NRL have far more individual games shown in isolation on TV, by far!!! Probably close to 75 for the year.

How the hell are you THAT far behind? > >

tack 48 ....

keep trying
you might come across something valid if you keep looking ....

[Raiderdave]

how is it assumption about our TV ratings you dimwit
are you assuming the NRL rep season( I call it that now because all of these games are played by NRL players)
didn't attract 17 Million veiwers last year ... when we all know they did
every one of them has ratings published ... just try & challenge this number
I bet you can't D head

SOO X 3
RL tests X2 in April & Oct
City Country in April
All stars in Feb

17 million veiwers ... + 114 Million veiwers
131 Million veiwers ..... 8 million more then the VFL

end of

Include legends games, preseason cup, brownlow, foxtel programs.....its the AFL beating RL.

Include the 50% longer running time and its a thrashing! AFL, number 1 TV sport in Australia =D>

Not to mention the extra 3-4 million who actually went to the games

oh
so yr only 5 Million behind then

[piesman2011]

how is it assumption about our TV ratings you dimwit
are you assuming the NRL rep season( I call it that now because all of these games are played by NRL players)
didn't attract 17 Million veiwers last year ... when we all know they did
every one of them has ratings published ... just try & challenge this number
I bet you can't D head

SOO X 3
RL tests X2 in April & Oct
City Country in April
All stars in Feb

17 million veiwers ... + 114 Million veiwers
131 Million veiwers ..... 8 million more then the VFL

end of

Include legends games, preseason cup, brownlow, foxtel programs.....its the AFL beating RL.

Include the 50% longer running time and its a thrashing! AFL, number 1 TV sport in Australia =D>

tack 47 people ....


preseason cup is included d head .... & programs don't count , they aren't GAMES
& anyway ... do you think no one watches our non game ... programs on Fox

so....
whats next ..... veiwers watching sport on the news , when VFL stories are being shown ?
desperation overload from these clowns
F me

yr done
numb 2.... again

& as I've pointed out
RL seems to be increasing its dominance =D> =D> =D> =D>

More assumptions with no quotes = no credability.

Why would they add the AFL preseason comp when comparing the AFL season to the NRL season? It doesnt make sense.

[Xman]

how is it assumption about our TV ratings you dimwit
are you assuming the NRL rep season( I call it that now because all of these games are played by NRL players)
didn't attract 17 Million veiwers last year ... when we all know they did
every one of them has ratings published ... just try & challenge this number
I bet you can't D head

SOO X 3
RL tests X2 in April & Oct
City Country in April
All stars in Feb

17 million veiwers ... + 114 Million veiwers
131 Million veiwers ..... 8 million more then the VFL

end of

Include the 50% longer running time =D>

a veiwer in the first hour .... is the same veiwer in the 3rd
he isn't 3 different people d head ....

Thats the point dunce. Longer shows get a lower average because its more likely they will have viewers who won't watch for the entire program. Therefore for the longer show to get the same or similar ratings they would have FAR more individual viewers. =D>

AFL, most watched sport on Australian TV =D>