
Only an increase on the real numbers by approx 700%


xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
The AFL would be quoting figures including auskick where as the minister for sport would not. It's not an exaggeration, it's a difference in the definition of "participant".justanotherleaguefan wrote:it's not a first time they've been caught fudging figures http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_...c02.htm#c02f46
Quote:
2.52 In what becomes somewhat of a circular argument, the AFL stated that a Western Sydney AFL team is necessary to consolidate grassroots efforts in a growing market:
We looked at the absolute size of the Western Sydney market and the need for the AFL to have a presence in a market that has the second strongest growing LGA in Australia. Blacktown and Baulkham Hills have significant support from migrant groups ... We are very aware of our challenges in growing that market, and ultimately we need an AFL franchise to continue the work we are doing at the base. The participation in the greater west of Sydney was of the order of 20,000 participants in 2008. We continue to invest in that region and are building a base to be a team at the top.[46]
the real number
Quote:
Information on the public record, attributed to the New South Wales Minister for Sport suggests that actual participation in Western Sydney is fewer than 3,000.[47]
oops
only out by more than 17,000
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
This was posted on BF. hmmmmm, perspective.Some more facts for everyone to consider:
- initial expression of interest by the AFL was for Glover St in Lilyfield.
- Count paid up school players who are unable to play for a club as their is no place for them in Leichhardt.
- Initial expression included broad postcode Forest Hill and Camperdown.
- Second expression of interest was more formal.
Listen to Tom Harley (General Manager AFL NSW/ACT) explain it here:
http://media.sky.apac.kitd.com/streamin ... YO8hlF.MP3
That interview is a weekly program Tom has on Big Sports Breakfast.
It is very clear that rugby league is putting up a stink against football growing ... nothing more nothing less. It is not a fight for Birchgrove, it is a rugby league vendetta. And it is helped along by the newspapers looking to sell papers.
I'd go the senates unbiased, objective definition anyday over a desperate and money hungry organisation like the AFLTLPG wrote:KE, that's why the AFL told the Senate to shove it. Because they got the definition WRONG!
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Looks like this entire episode was a beat up by Sydney media to sell papers! How pathetic!Former Geelong capt & AFL NSW boss Tom Harley tells Leichhardt Cl the claim AFL wanted to use league's iconic Birchgrove Oval was untrue.
Tom Harley #aflnsw said AFL had never asked for use of#birchgroveoval and alleged battle with league for control was a political beat up.
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
No I'm simply putting up truthful comments and statements. It's you turkeys who are paranoid.TLPG wrote:And yet you lot are trying to put us down every second you can! Paranoia runs wild!
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Who lied? The NSW AFL put an initial submission in like all other sports. When it came to the final submission they adjusted their numbers of participants after doing a more accurate analysis.justanotherleaguefan wrote:Well why do yous have the need to lie about figures
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests