ahhh...Xman wrote:That's cummulative, not weekly dopey. It's amazing how a longer season and including rep games gives ARL a higher cummulative figure (which is bs anyway) and then NRL fans say they have higher weekly ratings.
I somehow don't think it will need to be discussedXman wrote:And what will be your excuse if it does beat the highest home and away NrL game this year?Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:35k!
That's below the average AFL attendance in Melbourne. yes, the average!
don't care if its half the average of VFL games in derpsville
will it beat the midgits n gooses game
thats all that matters
Cummulative is a total. It doesn't take into account if there are more samples taken. A weekly figure is only comparable if the number of samples is the same. In this case it clearly is not.Raiderdave wrote:ahhh...Xman wrote:That's cummulative, not weekly dopey. It's amazing how a longer season and including rep games gives ARL a higher cummulative figure (which is bs anyway) and then NRL fans say they have higher weekly ratings.
and how do you get a cumulative figure
by
adding up the weeky figures
BUT BUT BUT ............Xman wrote:Cummulative is a total. It doesn't take into account if there are more samples taken. A weekly figure is only comparable if the number of samples is the same. In this case it clearly is not.Raiderdave wrote:ahhh...Xman wrote:That's cummulative, not weekly dopey. It's amazing how a longer season and including rep games gives ARL a higher cummulative figure (which is bs anyway) and then NRL fans say they have higher weekly ratings.
and how do you get a cumulative figure
by
adding up the weeky figures
Not to mention the fact that the same number of viewing hours per week (14) counts as 7 views for the NRL and only 4.5 views for the AFL.
Not to mention the Bs that is the regional ratings.
Ha, nice try. Don't claim your games weekly total is bigger because of a total figure for the season champ. You have more games per season plus rep games. That's hardly but but butRaiderdave wrote:BUT BUT BUT ............Xman wrote:Cummulative is a total. It doesn't take into account if there are more samples taken. A weekly figure is only comparable if the number of samples is the same. In this case it clearly is not.Raiderdave wrote:ahhh...
and how do you get a cumulative figure
by
adding up the weeky figures
Not to mention the fact that the same number of viewing hours per week (14) counts as 7 views for the NRL and only 4.5 views for the AFL.
Not to mention the Bs that is the regional ratings.
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
oh they don't exist in the minds of VFL derpsters EKing-Eliagh wrote:Xman regional people are people too. Why are you discriminating against regional folk?
Haha. Tasmanian, south Australian and western Australian regional people are people too you know. Why are you discriminating against these folk? :DKing-Eliagh wrote:Xman regional people are people too. Why are you discriminating against regional folk?
Was going to say just that. So KE, Raider, pussycat and co? Why do you discriminate? If we can't count everyone, we should ignore the regional ratings as far as I'm concerned. They are dodgey otherwise.Xman wrote:Haha. Tasmanian, south Australian and western Australian regional people are people too you know. Why are you discriminating against these folk?King-Eliagh wrote:Xman regional people are people too. Why are you discriminating against regional folk?
Oh FFS. What would you know?King-Eliagh wrote:I can see Raider's point re this crowd is supposed to be a historic match but its really drawing a poor crowd and we all know when anz aint over 55-60k the atmosphere is miserable in there.
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Beaussie wrote:Was going to say just that. So KE, Raider, pussycat and co? Why do you discriminate? If we can't count everyone, we should ignore the regional ratings as far as I'm concerned. They are dodgey otherwise.Xman wrote:Haha. Tasmanian, south Australian and western Australian regional people are people too you know. Why are you discriminating against these folk?King-Eliagh wrote:Xman regional people are people too. Why are you discriminating against regional folk?
King-Eliagh wrote:I'm not discriminating against those regional folk you mention Xman, I'm not the one blurting regionals shouldnt count.
It'd be great to add those regionals in as well. Can either Xman or beaussie summon those regional numbers, add them up and include them in? I'm sure the regional pop of Tas, WA and SA make up about a fifth of the regional pop in nsw and qld
