Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Muhahahahahahahah.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
The only time they were seriously looking at establishing themselves was in Sydney. They have been Melbourne based since James Brayshaw took over and he has made it clear that they are staying in Melbourne.ParraEelsNRL wrote:LOL, the not real Nth Kangawhos have relocated and failed more times in different areas than the removed expansion sides in the ARL have lost, fact.
RL
Perth Reds
Adelaide Rams (don't count as they were a SL team made up to get a comp off the ground)
SE QLD Crushers.
Not Real Nth Kangawhos
Melbourne Multiple times lol.
West Sydney
Canberra
Gold Coast
And soon the be Tasmania and Ballarat.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
That's why they are playing 4 games in the Two headed state and are looking at Ballarat?
Hmmm, staying put.
Hmmm, staying put.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Yes, staying put. If they weren't they wouldn't be playing any games in Melbourne.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Delusion.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
That's you, Debbie. Deluded to the max.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Well shiit, I already said you are, no need to repeat it.
If staying put means playing games in another state, then that's staying put I guess.
If staying put means playing games in another state, then that's staying put I guess.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Actually the ROOS have never committed to anywhere other than Melbourne.NSWAFL wrote:The only time they were seriously looking at establishing themselves was in Sydney. They have been Melbourne based since James Brayshaw took over and he has made it clear that they are staying in Melbourne.
IMO they'd been more open to re-locating something might have eventuated but they didn't.
Pretty pathetic attempt parafeel to suggest that the Roos are some sort expansion failure.
They haven't moved anywhere yet.
The Ballarat/Bendigo thing IMO is a winner, being just North of Melbourne.
Nice try Cos.
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9713
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Must confess I've long been a critic of the Roos, but I'm in agreement with you that the Ballarat/Bendigo proposal may just be what is required to secure their long term future. Good luck Roos.cos789 wrote:Actually the ROOS have never committed to anywhere other than Melbourne.NSWAFL wrote:The only time they were seriously looking at establishing themselves was in Sydney. They have been Melbourne based since James Brayshaw took over and he has made it clear that they are staying in Melbourne.
IMO they'd been more open to re-locating something might have eventuated but they didn't.
Pretty pathetic attempt parafeel to suggest that the Roos are some sort expansion failure.
They haven't moved anywhere yet.
The Ballarat/Bendigo thing IMO is a winner, being just North of Melbourne.
If only the Melbourne Storm's future was as secure. Take away the News Ltd handouts and what's left? A move the the Central Coast perhaps.
- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
It's the first time the Roos have said that they would like to move somewhere instead of just playing games somewhere.Beaussie wrote:Must confess I've long been a critic of the Roos, but I'm in agreement with you that the Ballarat/Bendigo proposal may just be what is required to secure their long term future. Good luck Roos.
It fits in with their name and location and is close enough for fans to travel easily either way.
That's the big question. They have stalled in spite of having top players and top results.Beaussie wrote:If only the Melbourne Storm's future was as secure. Take away the News Ltd handouts and what's left?
When that imputus disappears, there could be an unholy implode.
Nice try Cos.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
Nah I think the Bears will reform and play at Blue Tongue first. In the end I think it will be......Beaussie wrote:If only the Melbourne Storm's future was as secure. Take away the News Ltd handouts and what's left? A move the the Central Coast perhaps.
Wellington Storm!

- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9713
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
In anycase, the Storm will be playing anywhere but Melbourne.




- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
They could play the Perth Reds in the Clayton's Cup.Beaussie wrote:In anycase, the Storm will be playing anywhere but Melbourne.![]()
![]()
Nice try Cos.
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
No it has to be a three match series for a cup, involving the Adelaide Rams! :D
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: Melbourne Storm = Another Failed NRL Expansion Franchise
yeahhNSWAFL wrote:No it has to be a three match series for a cup, involving the Adelaide Rams! :D
Storm Reds & Rams .... for the **** state cup .... I like it

RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
