Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been liked: 9 times
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
So sad that I've received a heap of PMs at LU telling me to continue and they are laughing their arses off at you ****.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
- Xman
- Coach
- Posts: 13919
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
Ok
Note to all TFC posters: From 2400 tonight if the term "*******" is used in a post it will result in the post being deleted no questions asked.
I originally set up this poll to take a week but clearly the vast majority of people that have voted have agreed with this action. Therefore I am enforcing it now (2400).
If by some miracle the voting numbers experience a big swing by next Sunday and the "no" vote wins I will change the rule back.
So, be warned.
Happy posting.
Note to all TFC posters: From 2400 tonight if the term "*******" is used in a post it will result in the post being deleted no questions asked.
I originally set up this poll to take a week but clearly the vast majority of people that have voted have agreed with this action. Therefore I am enforcing it now (2400).
If by some miracle the voting numbers experience a big swing by next Sunday and the "no" vote wins I will change the rule back.
So, be warned.
Happy posting.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been liked: 9 times
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
Yes oh mighty king of the VicDerps!
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
Where's the hord that you said would invade here parafeel ?ParraEelsNRL wrote:So sad that I've received a heap of PMs at LU.

Nice try Cos.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been liked: 9 times
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
They are watching, lurking, doing the exact same thing you guys do at the original TFC and reporting back to their clan and masters.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been liked: 9 times
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been liked: 9 times
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
Tick tock tick tock, it's 11:18, not long and the ******* stops.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been liked: 9 times
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?














signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
Where's all your backup, eh , parafeel ?cos789 wrote:Where's the hord that you said would invade here parafeel ?ParraEelsNRL wrote:So sad that I've received a heap of PMs at LU.
Nice try Cos.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
Xman wrote:Ok
Note to all TFC posters: From 2400 tonight if the term "*******" is used in a post it will result in the post being deleted no questions asked.
I originally set up this poll to take a week but clearly the vast majority of people that have voted have agreed with this action. Therefore I am enforcing it now (2400).
If by some miracle the voting numbers experience a big swing by next Sunday and the "no" vote wins I will change the rule back.
So, be warned.
Happy posting.
Gutless
plain gutless & biased
but typical of flogballers



RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

- Xman
- Coach
- Posts: 13919
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
I would say using personally abusive terms on a forum is gutless. You wouldnt do it to someone in person. You hide behind your keyboard.Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Ok
Note to all TFC posters: From 2400 tonight if the term "*******" is used in a post it will result in the post being deleted no questions asked.
I originally set up this poll to take a week but clearly the vast majority of people that have voted have agreed with this action. Therefore I am enforcing it now (2400).
If by some miracle the voting numbers experience a big swing by next Sunday and the "no" vote wins I will change the rule back.
So, be warned.
Happy posting.
Gutless
plain gutless & biased
but typical of flogballers![]()
![]()
ANyway, a good start so far today. We've still got fighting but with less childish abuse.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 2402
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:48 pm
- Team: Sydney Hills Eagles
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
And the poll is now 20-10 against the term. You know I think a couple of AFL haters have voted against it! Maybe there's some common sense **** the NRL fan base here. Come on, own up!
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
Xman wrote:I would say using personally abusive terms on a forum is gutless. You wouldnt do it to someone in person. You hide behind your keyboard.Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Ok
Note to all TFC posters: From 2400 tonight if the term "*******" is used in a post it will result in the post being deleted no questions asked.
I originally set up this poll to take a week but clearly the vast majority of people that have voted have agreed with this action. Therefore I am enforcing it now (2400).
If by some miracle the voting numbers experience a big swing by next Sunday and the "no" vote wins I will change the rule back.
So, be warned.
Happy posting.
Gutless
plain gutless & biased
but typical of flogballers![]()
![]()
ANyway, a good start so far today. We've still got fighting but with less childish abuse.
I'd say its fun
don't give a rats A hole what you think about it

RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
NSWAFL wrote:And the poll is now 20-10 against the term. You know I think a couple of AFL haters have voted against it! Maybe there's some common sense **** the NRL fan base here. Come on, own up!
it was 14-10....... 5 minutes ago
there aren't 20 AFL posters in this forum
its obvious the thing is rigged
& not a clear indication of anything ... & typical of flogballers
being gutless turds is one of their better qualities

RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

-
- Coach
- Posts: 2402
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:48 pm
- Team: Sydney Hills Eagles
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?
Being a bigot is fun huh? No wonder there's so much violence in the world, with an attitude like that.Raiderdave wrote:I'd say its fun
don't give a rats A hole what you think about it
As for your last remark, I did speculate that there was some common sense **** your fans knowing that a fair fight is better and more fun than a dirty one. But then you don't want to know that because you don't have the intelligence to fight fair.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 7 guests