butthurt?Bumsniffers wrote: Tue Mar 22, 2022 11:15 amwhy are you so butthurt about stuff you clearly know nothing about
im having a ball with you wankers







butthurt?Bumsniffers wrote: Tue Mar 22, 2022 11:15 amwhy are you so butthurt about stuff you clearly know nothing about
the point & fumblerscehar5 wrote: Wed Mar 23, 2022 3:01 pmIf there were less FTA games then less people would watch. Fascinating stuff haha.
what ?cehar5 wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 9:51 amOnce again I like both sports but yeah I think your point is redundant. If there were less games per week and therefore the audience less diluted, would the average per game remain the same?
What?truthbomber wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:20 pmwhat ?cehar5 wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 9:51 amOnce again I like both sports but yeah I think your point is redundant. If there were less games per week and therefore the audience less diluted, would the average per game remain the same?![]()
what are you talking about you derping moron
Its the accessibility to different types of coverage & the impact it has on ratings
only 33% of Australians have access to STV
while 100% have access to FTA
if you increase your nationally telecast FTA games ( everyone able to watch a game nationally ) from 3 to 4 for a round of course you're going to increase your overall audience & your round average
thats what the awful did in rnd 1
what ?Quolls2019 wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:57 pmWhat?truthbomber wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:20 pmwhat ?cehar5 wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 9:51 amOnce again I like both sports but yeah I think your point is redundant. If there were less games per week and therefore the audience less diluted, would the average per game remain the same?![]()
what are you talking about you derping moron
Its the accessibility to different types of coverage & the impact it has on ratings
only 33% of Australians have access to STV
while 100% have access to FTA
if you increase your nationally telecast FTA games ( everyone able to watch a game nationally ) from 3 to 4 for a round of course you're going to increase your overall audience & your round average
thats what the awful did in rnd 1
What?truthbomber wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:59 pmwhat ?Quolls2019 wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:57 pmWhat?truthbomber wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:20 pm
what ?![]()
what are you talking about you derping moron
Its the accessibility to different types of coverage & the impact it has on ratings
only 33% of Australians have access to STV
while 100% have access to FTA
if you increase your nationally telecast FTA games ( everyone able to watch a game nationally ) from 3 to 4 for a round of course you're going to increase your overall audience & your round average
thats what the awful did in rnd 1
Can make a post without referring to 'awful' or 'fumble' or name calling? Or you like this petty rubbish? This is fun for you? To talk to people like a child on the internet?truthbomber wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:20 pmwhat ?cehar5 wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 9:51 amOnce again I like both sports but yeah I think your point is redundant. If there were less games per week and therefore the audience less diluted, would the average per game remain the same?![]()
what are you talking about you derping moron
Its the accessibility to different types of coverage & the impact it has on ratings
only 33% of Australians have access to STV
while 100% have access to FTA
if you increase your nationally telecast FTA games ( everyone able to watch a game nationally ) from 3 to 4 for a round of course you're going to increase your overall audience & your round average
thats what the awful did in rnd 1
hahahacehar5 wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 3:15 pmCan make a post without referring to 'awful' or 'fumble' or name calling? Or you like this petty rubbish? This is fun for you? To talk to people like a child on the internet?truthbomber wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:20 pmwhat ?cehar5 wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 9:51 amOnce again I like both sports but yeah I think your point is redundant. If there were less games per week and therefore the audience less diluted, would the average per game remain the same?![]()
what are you talking about you derping moron
Its the accessibility to different types of coverage & the impact it has on ratings
only 33% of Australians have access to STV
while 100% have access to FTA
if you increase your nationally telecast FTA games ( everyone able to watch a game nationally ) from 3 to 4 for a round of course you're going to increase your overall audience & your round average
thats what the awful did in rnd 1
cehar5 wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 3:15 pmCan make a post without referring to 'awful' or 'fumble' or name calling? Or you like this petty rubbish? This is fun for you? To talk to people like a child on the internet?truthbomber wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:20 pmwhat ?cehar5 wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 9:51 amOnce again I like both sports but yeah I think your point is redundant. If there were less games per week and therefore the audience less diluted, would the average per game remain the same?![]()
what are you talking about you derping moron
Its the accessibility to different types of coverage & the impact it has on ratings
only 33% of Australians have access to STV
while 100% have access to FTA
if you increase your nationally telecast FTA games ( everyone able to watch a game nationally ) from 3 to 4 for a round of course you're going to increase your overall audience & your round average
thats what the awful did in rnd 1
Works well, which is why we are down to about 7 posters.. rugby league logic.AFLcrap1 wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 6:36 pmcehar5 wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 3:15 pmCan make a post without referring to 'awful' or 'fumble' or name calling? Or you like this petty rubbish? This is fun for you? To talk to people like a child on the internet?truthbomber wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:20 pm
what ?![]()
what are you talking about you derping moron
Its the accessibility to different types of coverage & the impact it has on ratings
only 33% of Australians have access to STV
while 100% have access to FTA
if you increase your nationally telecast FTA games ( everyone able to watch a game nationally ) from 3 to 4 for a round of course you're going to increase your overall audience & your round average
thats what the awful did in rnd 1![]()
![]()
This is a fight club .
You're supposed to talk shit about an opposition sport .
What?truthbomber wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 6:03 pmhahahacehar5 wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 3:15 pmCan make a post without referring to 'awful' or 'fumble' or name calling? Or you like this petty rubbish? This is fun for you? To talk to people like a child on the internet?truthbomber wrote: Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:20 pm
what ?![]()
what are you talking about you derping moron
Its the accessibility to different types of coverage & the impact it has on ratings
only 33% of Australians have access to STV
while 100% have access to FTA
if you increase your nationally telecast FTA games ( everyone able to watch a game nationally ) from 3 to 4 for a round of course you're going to increase your overall audience & your round average
thats what the awful did in rnd 1
awww , the poor widdle fumbler is offended
harden up princess
you're acting like a typical hissy fit chucking clown , i'll talk to fumblers exactly the way their arrogant asses should be![]()
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 8 guests