Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Which is the best football code? Here you can have it out with other football fans.
Terry
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3389
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:19 pm
Team: Wests Tigers
Location:
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 47 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by Terry »

NlolRL wrote: Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:27 pm
Terry wrote: Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:19 pm And the proof I provided was only a couple of days after the level 3 lockdown. I suspect the increase is now much more. And now with Dictator Dan closing the joint down completely they'll go up again.
got any proof of this? :afro:
Wow!!!!!!! Now ya adding humour to your repertoire pal!!!!! Tremendous stuff!!!! Please keep this level going. This is a real lift in standards!!!!


pussycat
Coach
Coach
Posts: 6554
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
Team: The Shanghai Sharks
Location:
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 29 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by pussycat »

Another Fizzer last night! But, But, But


LIVE: AFL PORT ADELAIDE V BULLDOGS FOX FOOTY
182,000

But, But, But :blahblah: :blahblah: :blahblah: :rock:


Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport! :cheers:

"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
Fred
Coach
Coach
Posts: 7596
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:13 am
Team: Collingwood
Location: Gold Coast
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 81 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by Fred »

No point just reporting fox. Need fta as well.


Veni, vidi, vici
Fred
Coach
Coach
Posts: 7596
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:13 am
Team: Collingwood
Location: Gold Coast
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 81 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by Fred »

Terry wrote: Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:03 pm
Fred wrote: Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:53 pm
leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Aug 03, 2020 3:40 pm

it's not desperate.
its fox game vs a fox game...
Pussy keeps shoving it up the Murdoch's throat
again why did you pay the AFL more ?

FTA deals between the codes are drastically different.

I think it is desperate. Obviously there is more to what they paid above that is ratings. Not rocket science. What that is I don’t know for sure but an educated guess may be.

1. AFL may have better rating shows around it.

2. AFL provides more content hours.

3. AFL may have a broader demographic

4. AFL may be seen as attracting the desired demographic

5. AFL may have a broader National reach.

6. AFL subscribers, for whatever reason, may be worth more. Maybe the bit larger packages for example when they do commit.


Whatever the reason, one of the most astute businessmen in the world, particularly in the media industry, felt it was worth paying what he did. Not for me to second guess his reason.
Freddo:

1. Wrong!
2. Wrong!
3. Wrong!
4. Wrong!
5. Wrong!
6 Wrong!

Rupie paid more last deal because he was pissed off Dave Smith gave preference to ch 9 with 4 FTA games per week. Doubling the previous FTA games on 9. Rupie had to pay Nine to buy the Saturday game off 'em. He weren't a happy media mogul!!!!!

It pissed him off so much he paid overs for the fumbling mess as an up you to Smith. Facts are always a handy instrument Freddo. They kinda beat an educated guess every time lololololololol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Firstly.... who are you to say I am wrong? Seriously... stay in your lane. You saying it is wrong does not make it so. Don’t confuse opinion with fact.

Secondly.... what I have postulated is simply possibilities .... not facts. Learn to read. Reasons why they may have paid more.

Thirdly.... you think one of the worlds top media moguls does deals on grievances ...... stupid stupid statement.


Fourthly.... you should know better than to challenge me. I’ll let you off normally and going light on you here.... but know your limits and your station in life PAL .....


Veni, vidi, vici
Terry
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3389
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:19 pm
Team: Wests Tigers
Location:
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 47 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by Terry »

Fred wrote: Tue Aug 04, 2020 2:03 pm
Terry wrote: Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:03 pm
Fred wrote: Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:53 pm


I think it is desperate. Obviously there is more to what they paid above that is ratings. Not rocket science. What that is I don’t know for sure but an educated guess may be.

1. AFL may have better rating shows around it.

2. AFL provides more content hours.

3. AFL may have a broader demographic

4. AFL may be seen as attracting the desired demographic

5. AFL may have a broader National reach.

6. AFL subscribers, for whatever reason, may be worth more. Maybe the bit larger packages for example when they do commit.


Whatever the reason, one of the most astute businessmen in the world, particularly in the media industry, felt it was worth paying what he did. Not for me to second guess his reason.
Freddo:

1. Wrong!
2. Wrong!
3. Wrong!
4. Wrong!
5. Wrong!
6 Wrong!

Rupie paid more last deal because he was pissed off Dave Smith gave preference to ch 9 with 4 FTA games per week. Doubling the previous FTA games on 9. Rupie had to pay Nine to buy the Saturday game off 'em. He weren't a happy media mogul!!!!!

It pissed him off so much he paid overs for the fumbling mess as an up you to Smith. Facts are always a handy instrument Freddo. They kinda beat an educated guess every time lololololololol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Firstly.... who are you to say I am wrong? Seriously... stay in your lane. You saying it is wrong does not make it so. Don’t confuse opinion with fact.

Secondly.... what I have postulated is simply possibilities .... not facts. Learn to read. Reasons why they may have paid more.

Thirdly.... you think one of the worlds top media moguls does deals on grievances ...... stupid stupid statement.


Fourthly.... you should know better than to challenge me. I’ll let you off normally and going light on you here.... but know your limits and your station in life PAL .....
Ah Freddy ol boyo lolololololololololol!!!!!!!!! You've gone all stand up comedian lololololoololololol!!!!!!!!!!! Great routine pal................. ROFL!!!!!!! I think you've found your niche in life my friend lololololololololol. Can we have some more please???????

Now back to reality: Here's a couple of beautifully articulated articles once again proving my point that Rupie spat the dum dum at RL and paid 'overs' for the last fumbling broadcast deal. It's common knowledge my friend. No serious analyst or commentator thinks differently.

Now: lets get back to the comedy Freddo............whatayagot pal lolololololololol???????????

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/smith-exits ... al-is-done

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/inside ... j2ajg.html


Terry
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3389
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:19 pm
Team: Wests Tigers
Location:
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 47 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by Terry »

Fred wrote: Tue Aug 04, 2020 1:58 pm No point just reporting fox. Need fta as well.
Well Frederico I've done ya research for ya my friend. I accept your extreme gratitude in anticipation!!!!

Last nights mess was not on FTA in Melbourne town last night. In fact the only place it was FTA was the little desert state of SA. And even there it was only on 7mate where it didn't make the top 20 list & was beaten by ratings juggernauts Peppa Pig, Fireman Sam & Peter Rabbit lololololol!!!!!

So it's actual number is unknown but ya can bet ya last shiny little penny it didn't do great!!!!!! Hope that helps pal!!!!

https://www.afl.com.au/broadcast-guide-premiership

https://tvblackbox.com.au/ratings/2020/ ... 8a1a0def67


User avatar
BrizzyFan12
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:28 pm
Team: Brisbane Lions
Location:
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by BrizzyFan12 »

All I'm going to say is that nearly every game that's a Foxfooty broadcast is also broadcasted into the states of the teams that are playing. I know many other Lions fans who solely watch foxfooty broadcasts on 7mate and I can imagine that there'd be many others who do the same for their team in their states. It's a very niche category because it's not necessarily FTA nationwide as some might claim but it definitely takes away numbers from the PTV numbers due to the fact that the main demographic of those games being played (that being the fans of said teams) have a completely free alternative rather than buying a subscription to Fox.


pussycat
Coach
Coach
Posts: 6554
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
Team: The Shanghai Sharks
Location:
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 29 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by pussycat »

BrizzyFan12 wrote: Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:09 pm All I'm going to say is that nearly every game that's a Foxfooty broadcast is also broadcasted into the states of the teams that are playing. I know many other Lions fans who solely watch foxfooty broadcasts on 7mate and I can imagine that there'd be many others who do the same for their team in their states. It's a very niche category because it's not necessarily FTA nationwide as some might claim but it definitely takes away numbers from the PTV numbers due to the fact that the main demographic of those games being played (that being the fans of said teams) have a completely free alternative rather than buying a subscription to Fox.
And this is why the AFL will have no option but to accept a majorly reduced contract on any new rights agreement with Fox.


Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport! :cheers:

"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
Terry
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3389
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:19 pm
Team: Wests Tigers
Location:
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 47 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by Terry »

The only place last nights AFL was on FTA TV was Qld where it was on 7mate. Tragically it didn't make the top 20 list for the night. Unfortunately it was out-rated by blockbuster shows Noddy Toyland, Fireman Sam & Little J and Big Cuz lololololololololol!!!!!!!!!!!

We now await sky high fox numbers!!!!!!!!


pussycat
Coach
Coach
Posts: 6554
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
Team: The Shanghai Sharks
Location:
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 29 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by pussycat »

There out! Small improvement but still below our average

LIVE: AFL RICHMOND V BRISBANE FOX FOOTY
224,000


Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport! :cheers:

"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
Terry
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3389
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:19 pm
Team: Wests Tigers
Location:
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 47 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by Terry »

pussycat wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 11:02 am There out! Small improvement but still below our average

LIVE: AFL RICHMOND V BRISBANE FOX FOOTY
224,000
That's a very poor result considering it was prime time and there was no FTA in Melbourne and the desert states. And it was 2nd V 3rd who are the reigning premiers. Very poor indeed!!!!


User avatar
leeroy*NRL*
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4770
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 2:54 pm
Team: St George Illawarra Dragons
Location:
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 18 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by leeroy*NRL* »

Fred wrote: Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:53 pm
leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Aug 03, 2020 3:40 pm
Fred wrote: Mon Aug 03, 2020 3:16 pm

Why do you selectively on report fox ratings? Well I know why - but just pointing this out.

Talk about desperate lol.... but but but -


Do we have the overall figures of people watching.
it's not desperate.
its fox game vs a fox game...
Pussy keeps shoving it up the Murdoch's throat
again why did you pay the AFL more ?

FTA deals between the codes are drastically different.

I think it is desperate. Obviously there is more to what they paid above that is ratings. Not rocket science. What that is I don’t know for sure but an educated guess may be.

1. AFL may have better rating shows around it.

2. AFL provides more content hours.

3. AFL may have a broader demographic

4. AFL may be seen as attracting the desired demographic

5. AFL may have a broader National reach.

6. AFL subscribers, for whatever reason, may be worth more. Maybe the bit larger packages for example when they do commit.


Whatever the reason, one of the most astute businessmen in the world, particularly in the media industry, felt it was worth paying what he did. Not for me to second guess his reason.
my reply to you sir.

1. wrong.. some of the NRL shows including matty johns are the highest rating shows, including super saturday programming.

2. AFL games do provide more content hours, but if you look at it from an advertsing point of view..
FOX FOOTY is advert free during play..
so extra adverts for breaks, yes AFL get the tick there.

3. Yes FOXTEL TOOK a PUNT to try and lift subs and get watching AFL> while there was a lift it didnt match the Rugby League.

4. useless point.

5. yes they do, which would help with advertising. but does not make up the extra amount received.

6. absolute wrong, NSW is the King for packages.


(summary) as we have seen FTA hurts the FOX deal...

AFL has a better FTA coverage deal than NRL>

and this is where it will hurt FOX's Next deal.

more value in NRL for FOX than AFL>>

Fact!


pussycat
Coach
Coach
Posts: 6554
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
Team: The Shanghai Sharks
Location:
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 29 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by pussycat »

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 2:45 pm
Fred wrote: Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:53 pm
leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Aug 03, 2020 3:40 pm

it's not desperate.
its fox game vs a fox game...
Pussy keeps shoving it up the Murdoch's throat
again why did you pay the AFL more ?

FTA deals between the codes are drastically different.

I think it is desperate. Obviously there is more to what they paid above that is ratings. Not rocket science. What that is I don’t know for sure but an educated guess may be.

1. AFL may have better rating shows around it.

2. AFL provides more content hours.

3. AFL may have a broader demographic

4. AFL may be seen as attracting the desired demographic

5. AFL may have a broader National reach.

6. AFL subscribers, for whatever reason, may be worth more. Maybe the bit larger packages for example when they do commit.


Whatever the reason, one of the most astute businessmen in the world, particularly in the media industry, felt it was worth paying what he did. Not for me to second guess his reason.
my reply to you sir.

1. wrong.. some of the NRL shows including matty johns are the highest rating shows, including super saturday programming.

2. AFL games do provide more content hours, but if you look at it from an advertsing point of view..
FOX FOOTY is advert free during play..
so extra adverts for breaks, yes AFL get the tick there.

3. Yes FOXTEL TOOK a PUNT to try and lift subs and get watching AFL> while there was a lift it didnt match the Rugby League.

4. useless point.

5. yes they do, which would help with advertising. but does not make up the extra amount received.

6. absolute wrong, NSW is the King for packages.


(summary) as we have seen FTA hurts the FOX deal...

AFL has a better FTA coverage deal than NRL>

and this is where it will hurt FOX's Next deal.

more value in NRL for FOX than AFL>>

Fact!
point 6.) Exactly Leeroy, Fred was waffling on about how good a business man Rupert Murdoch is, yet neglects to tell us why Murdoch chose Rugby League to spearhead his new PTV business. Would seem a strange decision if AFL was a more valuable product.
These users liked the author pussycat for the post:
leeroy*NRL* (Wed Aug 05, 2020 3:26 pm)


Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport! :cheers:

"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
pussycat
Coach
Coach
Posts: 6554
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
Team: The Shanghai Sharks
Location:
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 29 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by pussycat »

LIVE: AFL ADELAIDE V MELBOURNE FOX FOOTY
251,000

LIVE: AFL GEELONG V NORTH MELBOURNE FOX FOOTY
176,000


Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport! :cheers:

"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
NlolRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 6933
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
Team: Melbourne Demons
Location:
Has liked: 43 times
Been liked: 118 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by NlolRL »

Souths v Broncos 762,000
Nine 514,000 (Metro 301,000 Regional 213,000) Only 126k for the Br0ncos in Brisbane LOL
Fox League 248,000

Essendon v Giants 911,000
Seven 722,000 (Metro 543,000 Regional 179,000)
Fox Footy 189,000

Another whipping


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests