HSBC dumps Wallabies to join Swans

[notaleaguefan]

Whoosh .
You changed your statement ..not your original post .
I even reposted them with the times on them .
You got caught out so you tried to repost with the lie omitted .
Lol
Too late .

Ffs learn to read properly
It was a general statement regarding nrlol events over the 80s and 90s

Learn to read . Lol
Learn to post in fucking English without the garbled rot
Your gibberish on here needs an interpreter

it was you who got triggered by the general statement
take those meds and get back to sucking on those lemons

HSBC could have chosen any one of the NSW based NRLOLOLOL teams! but did they! nup
they choose the Swans

[notaleaguefan]

Whoosh .
You changed your statement ..not your original post .
I even reposted them with the times on them .
You got caught out so you tried to repost with the lie omitted .
Lol
Too late .

Ffs learn to read properly
It was a general statement regarding nrlol events over the 80s and 90s

Learn to read . Lol
Learn to post in fucking English without the garbled rot
Your gibberish on here needs an interpreter

it was you who got triggered by the general statement
take those meds and get back to sucking on those lemons

HSBC could have chosen any one of the NSW based NRLOLOLOL teams! but did they! nup
they choose the Swans

[AFLcrap1]

Nope you continually rant about RL in a thread that has nothing to do with it .
It's about AFL/ru sponsorship .
Yet all you talk about is RL
Lol lol lol
Even to the extent of lying about a SL war in the 80s.
So many many lols

[notaleaguefan]

Nope you continually rant about RL in a thread that has nothing to do with it .
It's about AFL/ru sponsorship .
Yet all you talk about is RL
Lol lol lol
Even to the extent of lying about a SL war in the 80s.
So many many lols

Lucrative sponsorship in nsw?

What was your original quote! Nrlol
Clubs don’t need sponsors due to wealthy owners and league clubs

[AFLcrap1]

Never said that
you're going off topic again with another lie .

Stop,ranting about RL in a rU/AFL thread .

[AFLcrap1]

Here is my original post about sponsorship .
Shows you lied again .
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6576&hilit=Sponsors ... rt=90about halfway down the page .

What a Gilligan rant .
Minnow minnow minnoww .
You brain dead blog ..you've been told over & over that different sports have different set ups for clubs .
Did it ever enter that mess that you call a brain that RL clubs with the backing of leagues clubs don't need to depend so much on sponsorship $$$ .
Jesus it's like Groundhog Day explaining things to you .
Every morn you press the reset button .


It's unedited .
Lol don't ya hate it when I show your lies up with proof .
.

[Nah]

The fact is that the Sydney Swans picked up a lucrative sponsorship in a competitive sports market.
I'm sure even rl people can understand the implications to that.

[Nah]

The fact is that the Sydney Swans picked up a lucrative sponsorship in a competitive sports market.
I'm sure even rl people can understand the implications to that.

[AFLcrap1]

Nope
They took something off RU .
Didn't affect RL at all
Yet that's what you lot are trying to turn this thread into .

It's a RU V AFL thread .

[Fred]

I think there is so many dollars in the sponsorship world ... and in a crowded market place like Sydney where you have 4 codes competing for that dollar then a sponsor abandoning one sport is news... then choosing one over the other 3 is significant I would think, particularly where rl is the dominant sport. But there be numerous reasons for choosing AFL over the other three. Maybe it was cheaper to sponsor the swans. Maybe greater national exposure. But I think it is a like for like as AFL has moved into the rugby union market and it is likely a focus to appeal to the north shore Chardonnay sipping crowd that saw then take on the swans.

[AngloFootballLeague]

I think there is so many dollars in the sponsorship world ... and in a crowded market place like Sydney where you have 4 codes competing for that dollar then a sponsor abandoning one sport is news... then choosing one over the other 3 is significant I would think, particularly where rl is the dominant sport. But there be numerous reasons for choosing AFL over the other three. Maybe it was cheaper to sponsor the swans. Maybe greater national exposure. But I think it is a like for like as AFL has moved into the rugby union market and it is likely a focus to appeal to the north shore Chardonnay sipping crowd that saw then take on the swans.

Lots of people in bottom states watch game - in Sydney however viewership is tiny

[Fred]

agree. I think it may be then tapping into the rugby union folk who have left rugby union... like for like re: followers in NSW. Plus swans get plenty of press on Sydney. And are a national brand. If they were to sponsor an NRL likely not to 1 hit their target market and 2. Not get the level of national exposure. Remember, the swans is the face of AFL in Sydney too whereas if they went to an nrl club it’s one of how many clubs?

[Nah]

I think it may be then tapping into the rugby union folk who have left rugby union... like for like re: followers in NSW. Plus swans get plenty of press on Sydney. And are a national brand. If they were to sponsor an NRL likely not to 1 hit their target market and 2. Not get the level of national exposure. Remember, the swans is the face of AFL in Sydney too whereas if they went to an nrl club it’s one of how many clubs?

Marketing is complex.

1. Companies sometimes want to be linked to successful professional entities like the Sydney Swans
2. Companies don't want to linked negatively with Folau in ru and the various antics in rl.
3. It depends on the product. HSBC could been seen as applicable to Swans fans.
4. it depends on the market. The W.C.E have a home sponsor and an away sponsor - different target markets.
5. Marketing is just about television but bums on seats and memberships etc.