if the data was shot you'd challenge it.......AFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:57 pmNope
We are sick of the same old shit over & over .
You keep your but buts .
Swim in the fishbowl
We will take gold
Gold gold

if the data was shot you'd challenge it.......AFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:57 pmNope
We are sick of the same old shit over & over .
You keep your but buts .
Swim in the fishbowl
We will take gold
Gold gold
well it actually changes everything. 9 concurrent games basically rate similar to 5 isolated games which is something I've said for years and you guys have denied every single time. You've claimed the split games to each market make up the difference of concurrent games which has been shown to be BS. Now there's clear data to back my claim and destroy yours you've resorted to Terry's defenseAFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 8:17 pmGo see GIl if you're not happy with scheduling .
Cry all you want
Doesn't change the fact that Rl wins .without the home ratings of one team every week ..
Oops probably sent you for another lap
there is nothing wrong with our scheduling. There's everything wrong with comparing cumulative ratings for different program schedulesAFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 9:36 pmOh dear I set him off
Round & round
Simple ..see GIl
Don't whine to us about scheduling .
Your total was only missing 3 PTV games. You had your usual 3 and a bit FTA games. Just shows the importance of FTA.NlolRL wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 8:44 pmwell it actually changes everything. 9 concurrent games basically rate similar to 5 isolated games which is something I've said for years and you guys have denied every single time. You've claimed the split games to each market make up the difference of concurrent games which has been shown to be BS. Now there's clear data to back my claim and destroy yours you've resorted to Terry's defenseAFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 8:17 pmGo see GIl if you're not happy with scheduling .
Cry all you want
Doesn't change the fact that Rl wins .without the home ratings of one team every week ..
Oops probably sent you for another lap![]()
Thanks for coming.
The_Wookie wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 8:40 pmso with origin included and ONLY the AFLs Premiership season counted - the NRL are ahead by 22,000 viewers, with 4 less matches played in total. (Theres another million AFL preseason viewers not counted)
3 PTV games wont make a big difference. You had 3 and a bit FTA games, as many as you usually have. but but but - next excuseNlolRL wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:29 amwhich means nothing given the figures show the AFL rates almost the same from 5 games shown in isolation as they do for 9 games shown concurrently.leeroy*NRL* wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:38 amregards to the seasonal ratings, taking out SOO
it is going to be very close.
($1.90 a piece.
if NRL includes Origin it will be approx a 8-10mill win.
The cumulative total is therefore complete BS
NlolRL wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 9:51 pmthere is nothing wrong with our scheduling. There's everything wrong with comparing cumulative ratings for different program schedulesAFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 9:36 pmOh dear I set him off
Round & round
Simple ..see GIl
Don't whine to us about scheduling .
Yet the total was around the same as a 9 game round. Clear proof a round with less games but shown in isolation rates as well as all games concurrently. This proves the effect of concurrent scheduling and disproves the benefit of targeted split games as an equal advantagepussycat wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:25 pm3 PTV games wont make a big difference. You had 3 and a bit FTA games, as many as you usually have. but but but - next excuseNlolRL wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:29 amwhich means nothing given the figures show the AFL rates almost the same from 5 games shown in isolation as they do for 9 games shown concurrently.leeroy*NRL* wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:38 amregards to the seasonal ratings, taking out SOO
it is going to be very close.
($1.90 a piece.
if NRL includes Origin it will be approx a 8-10mill win.
The cumulative total is therefore complete BS![]()
According to wookie 3.4m meaning not much than 3.8 with your PTV Games.NlolRL wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:40 amYet the total was around the same as a 9 game round. Clear proof a round with less games but shown in isolation rates as well as all games concurrently. This proves the effect of concurrent scheduling and disproves the benefit of targeted split games as an equal advantagepussycat wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:25 pm3 PTV games wont make a big difference. You had 3 and a bit FTA games, as many as you usually have. but but but - next excuseNlolRL wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:29 am
which means nothing given the figures show the AFL rates almost the same from 5 games shown in isolation as they do for 9 games shown concurrently.
The cumulative total is therefore complete BS![]()
err, what does this mean?pussycat wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:43 am
According to wookie 3.4m meaning not much than 3.8 with your PTV Games.
again, WTF are you talking about?I went through every match in Perth of a Sat/Sunday. last year - get yourself a fridge magnet!
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 6 guests