Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Which is the best football code? Here you can have it out with other football fans.
pussycat
Coach
Coach
Posts: 6634
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
Team: The Shanghai Sharks
Location: far away
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by pussycat »

The_Wookie wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 8:40 pm so with origin included and ONLY the AFLs Premiership season counted - the NRL are ahead by 22,000 viewers, with 4 less matches played in total. (Theres another million AFL preseason viewers not counted)

How many did we get preseason wookie? WCC and all stars game on c9 ,some preseason games & charity shield on fox.?

How much less FTA?
Last edited by pussycat on Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.


Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport! :cheers:

"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
pussycat
Coach
Coach
Posts: 6634
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
Team: The Shanghai Sharks
Location: far away
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by pussycat »

NlolRL wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:29 am
leeroy*NRL* wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:38 am regards to the seasonal ratings, taking out SOO
it is going to be very close.
($1.90 a piece.

if NRL includes Origin it will be approx a 8-10mill win.
which means nothing given the figures show the AFL rates almost the same from 5 games shown in isolation as they do for 9 games shown concurrently.

The cumulative total is therefore complete BS
3 PTV games wont make a big difference. You had 3 and a bit FTA games, as many as you usually have. but but but - next excuse :cheers:


Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport! :cheers:

"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
AFLcrap1
Coach
Coach
Posts: 18584
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:49 am
Team: The Scottish Puffins
Location:
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 45 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by AFLcrap1 »

NlolRL wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 9:51 pm
AFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 9:36 pm Oh dear I set him off
Round & round
Simple ..see GIl
Don't whine to us about scheduling .
there is nothing wrong with our scheduling. There's everything wrong with comparing cumulative ratings for different program schedules
:(/ :(/ :(/ :(/
Your whole argument/ whinging ..bitching is around scheduling .
Go see GIl


LIC self ownage
Lol $10 NRL tickets.$10 NRL tickets .How pathetic is that ?
Crickets chirping after I post $5 AFlol tickets .
Self ownage ..no one does it better .
NlolRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 7094
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
Team: Melbourne Demons
Location:
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 122 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by NlolRL »

pussycat wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:25 pm
NlolRL wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:29 am
leeroy*NRL* wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:38 am regards to the seasonal ratings, taking out SOO
it is going to be very close.
($1.90 a piece.

if NRL includes Origin it will be approx a 8-10mill win.
which means nothing given the figures show the AFL rates almost the same from 5 games shown in isolation as they do for 9 games shown concurrently.

The cumulative total is therefore complete BS
3 PTV games wont make a big difference. You had 3 and a bit FTA games, as many as you usually have. but but but - next excuse :cheers:
Yet the total was around the same as a 9 game round. Clear proof a round with less games but shown in isolation rates as well as all games concurrently. This proves the effect of concurrent scheduling and disproves the benefit of targeted split games as an equal advantage
These users liked the author NlolRL for the post:
Cats_Steve (Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:23 am)


Cats_Steve
Seniors
Seniors
Posts: 376
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 10:48 am
Team: Geelong
Location:
Has liked: 202 times
Been liked: 26 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by Cats_Steve »

Too much logic and rational thinking required nlol.
Something something fishbowl.


Never realised quite how much hate there was for AFL from our Northern friends.
pussycat
Coach
Coach
Posts: 6634
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
Team: The Shanghai Sharks
Location: far away
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by pussycat »

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:40 am
pussycat wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:25 pm
NlolRL wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:29 am
which means nothing given the figures show the AFL rates almost the same from 5 games shown in isolation as they do for 9 games shown concurrently.

The cumulative total is therefore complete BS
3 PTV games wont make a big difference. You had 3 and a bit FTA games, as many as you usually have. but but but - next excuse :cheers:
Yet the total was around the same as a 9 game round. Clear proof a round with less games but shown in isolation rates as well as all games concurrently. This proves the effect of concurrent scheduling and disproves the benefit of targeted split games as an equal advantage
According to wookie 3.4m meaning not much than 3.8 with your PTV Games.

I went through every match in Perth of a Sat/Sunday. last year - get yourself a fridge magnet!


Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport! :cheers:

"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
NlolRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 7094
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
Team: Melbourne Demons
Location:
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 122 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by NlolRL »

pussycat wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:43 am
According to wookie 3.4m meaning not much than 3.8 with your PTV Games.
err, what does this mean?
I went through every match in Perth of a Sat/Sunday. last year - get yourself a fridge magnet!
again, WTF are you talking about?


NlolRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 7094
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
Team: Melbourne Demons
Location:
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 122 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by NlolRL »

https://tvtonight.com.au/2019/06/thursd ... -2019.html

8 SEVEN’S AFL: THURSDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL Seven Network 622,000 29,000 341,000 23,000 159,000 70,000

NRL doesnt appear to have made the top 20..... :hmm: Surely that's a mistake :shock:


User avatar
The_Wookie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 6691
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:22 am
Team: Carlton
Location:
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 90 times
Contact:

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by The_Wookie »

NRL beaten by masterchef in Sydney





pussycat wrote: Ps I support Collingwood, I've supported the Cats all my life
Image
NlolRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 7094
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
Team: Melbourne Demons
Location:
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 122 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by NlolRL »

Another AFL match over 1 mil. Another AFL win over the NRL. Mid season and the NRL havent won a single game v game yet.


Terry
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3488
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:19 pm
Team: Wests Tigers
Location:
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 51 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by Terry »

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:40 am
pussycat wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:25 pm
NlolRL wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:29 am
which means nothing given the figures show the AFL rates almost the same from 5 games shown in isolation as they do for 9 games shown concurrently.

The cumulative total is therefore complete BS
3 PTV games wont make a big difference. You had 3 and a bit FTA games, as many as you usually have. but but but - next excuse :cheers:
Yet the total was around the same as a 9 game round. Clear proof a round with less games but shown in isolation rates as well as all games concurrently. This proves the effect of concurrent scheduling and disproves the benefit of targeted split games as an equal advantage
Oh wow!!!!!! Flash bulb moment!!!!!!!! Isolation....concurrent....scheduling. Brilliant!!! Never heard that before!!!! I can see clearly now the the lame excusesare here lololol!!!!!!!!!

On a factual note: I see RL has now hit the front of TV viewership. Yep......the most watched sport in good 'ol Ostraya!!!!! And with less games played.

We all know how this is gonna play out........another winning year for the good 'ol girl RL!!!!!


Terry
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3488
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:19 pm
Team: Wests Tigers
Location:
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 51 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by Terry »

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:40 am
pussycat wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:25 pm
NlolRL wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:29 am
which means nothing given the figures show the AFL rates almost the same from 5 games shown in isolation as they do for 9 games shown concurrently.

The cumulative total is therefore complete BS
3 PTV games wont make a big difference. You had 3 and a bit FTA games, as many as you usually have. but but but - next excuse :cheers:
Yet the total was around the same as a 9 game round. Clear proof a round with less games but shown in isolation rates as well as all games concurrently. This proves the effect of concurrent scheduling and disproves the benefit of targeted split games as an equal advantage
Oh wow!!!!!! Flash bulb moment!!!!!!!! Isolation....concurrent....scheduling. Brilliant!!! Never heard that before!!!! I can see clearly now the the lame excusesare here lololol!!!!!!!!!

On a factual note: I see RL has now hit the front of TV viewership. Yep......the most watched sport in good 'ol Ostraya!!!!! And with less games played.

We all know how this is gonna play out........another winning year for the good 'ol girl RL!!!!!


NlolRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 7094
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
Team: Melbourne Demons
Location:
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 122 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by NlolRL »

Terry wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:06 am
NlolRL wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:40 am
pussycat wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:25 pm

3 PTV games wont make a big difference. You had 3 and a bit FTA games, as many as you usually have. but but but - next excuse :cheers:
Yet the total was around the same as a 9 game round. Clear proof a round with less games but shown in isolation rates as well as all games concurrently. This proves the effect of concurrent scheduling and disproves the benefit of targeted split games as an equal advantage
Oh wow!!!!!! Flash bulb moment!!!!!!!! Isolation....concurrent....scheduling. Brilliant!!! Never heard that before!!!! I can see clearly now the the lame excusesare here lololol!!!!!!!!!

On a factual note: I see RL has now hit the front of TV viewership. Yep......the most watched sport in good 'ol Ostraya!!!!! And with less games played.

We all know how this is gonna play out........another winning year for the good 'ol girl RL!!!!!
except the data proves the issue isnt lame, it's genuine. :wave:

Seriously, who gives a fuck about concurrent totals when the networks dont. You think CH7 give a damn when they win every Thursday or Friday noght over ch9's NRL? :wave:
Last edited by NlolRL on Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:21 am, edited 1 time in total.


pussycat
Coach
Coach
Posts: 6634
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
Team: The Shanghai Sharks
Location: far away
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by pussycat »

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 10:52 am Another AFL match over 1 mil. Another AFL win over the NRL. Mid season and the NRL havent won a single game v game yet.
Any over 3m yet?


Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport! :cheers:

"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
NlolRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 7094
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
Team: Melbourne Demons
Location:
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 122 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by NlolRL »

pussycat wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:17 am
NlolRL wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 10:52 am Another AFL match over 1 mil. Another AFL win over the NRL. Mid season and the NRL havent won a single game v game yet.
Any over 3m yet?
and back to SOO... :lol:

So predictable to include SOO when your competition continues to fail


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 14 guests