Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Which is the best football code? Here you can have it out with other football fans.
NlolRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 7393
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
Team: Melbourne Demons
Location:
Has liked: 51 times
Been liked: 135 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by NlolRL »

pussycat wrote: Sun Jun 09, 2019 9:50 pm Firstly not everyone with PTV watched this match. many don't even watch football
which applies to fans of both codes. Therefore, if there are 50% more NRL fans with subs the result will always come out about 50% more of your total. Eg: your fox figure makes up 30% of the total to our 20%
Canberra population with PTV ? Unknown!
West population with PTV ? also Unknown!
Others with PTV watching this match ? also unknown !
The Only thing known is that, in this case 30% of the people watching this match watched it on PTV.


While 20% of the people watching your game were watching on PTV . A difference (in this particular case) of 10%
irrelevant. The figures show the difference nation-wide, and have all year. The AFL have been rating around 1mil every Thurs/Fri with ratings around the low 200's.
eg. 30% ,30 apples or 30 dollars - 20 = 10.
and 10 is 50% more than 20 :[]
NRL = 80matches
Perth = 95 or 96 matches , and we both know Adelaide, Sydney, Brisbane will be similar.
I actually counted every single FTA game in Perth and there are 89 so stop bullshitting. Adelaide have 92 FTA games but 7 are delayed by between 2 and 3 hours, plus they have some games on 7mate.

The FTA advantage is simply not there, it's more BS excuses from you
Not at all Professor LOL . As I said Above Friday is not our main game.
No, it's either Thursday or Friday. They are your highest rating games every week. Our Saturday game with a small following rated higher than any NRL game this week despite you claiming the AFL only rates on Fridays (stupid logic given we also smash you on Thursdays). And this is despite Saturday rating 10% lower overall than any other day of the week.

Your excuses have been systematically destroyed, you have none left
These users liked the author NlolRL for the post:
Cats_Steve (Mon Jun 10, 2019 10:40 am)


pussycat
Coach
Coach
Posts: 6632
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
Team: The Shanghai Sharks
Location: far away
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by pussycat »

NlolRL wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 9:09 am
pussycat wrote: Sun Jun 09, 2019 9:50 pm Firstly not everyone with PTV watched this match. many don't even watch football
which applies to fans of both codes. Therefore, if there are 50% more NRL fans with subs the result will always come out about 50% more of your total. Eg: your fox figure makes up 30% of the total to our 20%
Canberra population with PTV ? Unknown!
West population with PTV ? also Unknown!
Others with PTV watching this match ? also unknown !
The Only thing known is that, in this case 30% of the people watching this match watched it on PTV.


While 20% of the people watching your game were watching on PTV . A difference (in this particular case) of 10%
irrelevant. The figures show the difference nation-wide, and have all year. The AFL have been rating around 1mil every Thurs/Fri with ratings around the low 200's.
eg. 30% ,30 apples or 30 dollars - 20 = 10.
and 10 is 50% more than 20 :[]
NRL = 80matches
Perth = 95 or 96 matches , and we both know Adelaide, Sydney, Brisbane will be similar.
I actually counted every single FTA game in Perth and there are 89 so stop bullshitting. Adelaide have 92 FTA games but 7 are delayed by between 2 and 3 hours, plus they have some games on 7mate.

The FTA advantage is simply not there, it's more BS excuses from you
Not at all Professor LOL . As I said Above Friday is not our main game.
No, it's either Thursday or Friday. They are your highest rating games every week. Our Saturday game with a small following rated higher than any NRL game this week despite you claiming the AFL only rates on Fridays (stupid logic given we also smash you on Thursdays). And this is despite Saturday rating 10% lower overall than any other day of the week.

Your excuses have been systematically destroyed, you have none left
The results come out around 10% probably closer to 5%if you ha'dnt picked out one of our worst supported sides. Certainly nothing like 50% professor .

Its not irrelevant at all . There is no possible way of telling just how many didn't watch this match.


Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport! :cheers:

"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
User avatar
Beaussie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9221
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Sydney
Has liked: 77 times
Been liked: 19 times
Contact:

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by Beaussie »

Terry wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 1:23 pm As stated by SMH AFL reporter Vince Rugari, "The AFL must be concerned that the supposedrapid growth of the game in NSW is not being borne out in the stands". He could also add in the Sydney TV ratings. It appears Dr Lawson was right. The AFL basically tell lies to try and sell the game. Unfortunately for them people in the educated northern states aren't bubble dwelling idiots!!!
Noticed that Vince Rugari couldn’t bring himself to report today in the SMH the positive news regarding the 15th place Swans drawing their biggest crowd of season 2019 at the SCG yesterday. Not one mention of the crowd in his articles today despite its significance. Reporting that fact does not fit with his AFL doom and gloom in NSW agenda I guess. :roll:

Vince reminds me of you Terry with his selective reporting of facts and a focus on negatives. Shithouse sports journalist in my opinion.
These users liked the author Beaussie for the post:
Cats_Steve (Mon Jun 10, 2019 1:20 pm)


"One in every 24 Australians is now a member of an AFL club, a sign that the national reach of Australian football has never been greater," League CEO Gillon McLachlan said.
NlolRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 7393
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
Team: Melbourne Demons
Location:
Has liked: 51 times
Been liked: 135 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by NlolRL »

pussycat wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 10:42 am
NlolRL wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 9:09 am
pussycat wrote: Sun Jun 09, 2019 9:50 pm Firstly not everyone with PTV watched this match. many don't even watch football
which applies to fans of both codes. Therefore, if there are 50% more NRL fans with subs the result will always come out about 50% more of your total. Eg: your fox figure makes up 30% of the total to our 20%
Canberra population with PTV ? Unknown!
West population with PTV ? also Unknown!
Others with PTV watching this match ? also unknown !
The Only thing known is that, in this case 30% of the people watching this match watched it on PTV.


While 20% of the people watching your game were watching on PTV . A difference (in this particular case) of 10%
irrelevant. The figures show the difference nation-wide, and have all year. The AFL have been rating around 1mil every Thurs/Fri with ratings around the low 200's.
eg. 30% ,30 apples or 30 dollars - 20 = 10.
and 10 is 50% more than 20 :[]
NRL = 80matches
Perth = 95 or 96 matches , and we both know Adelaide, Sydney, Brisbane will be similar.
I actually counted every single FTA game in Perth and there are 89 so stop bullshitting. Adelaide have 92 FTA games but 7 are delayed by between 2 and 3 hours, plus they have some games on 7mate.

The FTA advantage is simply not there, it's more BS excuses from you
Not at all Professor LOL . As I said Above Friday is not our main game.
No, it's either Thursday or Friday. They are your highest rating games every week. Our Saturday game with a small following rated higher than any NRL game this week despite you claiming the AFL only rates on Fridays (stupid logic given we also smash you on Thursdays). And this is despite Saturday rating 10% lower overall than any other day of the week.

Your excuses have been systematically destroyed, you have none left
The results come out around 10% probably closer to 5%if you ha'dnt picked out one of our worst supported sides. Certainly nothing like 50% professor .

Its not irrelevant at all . There is no possible way of telling just how many didn't watch this match.
Fmd you're stupid. If the AFL outrate the nrl by 250k yet the nrl get 40k more on fox they obviously have far higher sub rates overall.

I am refering to the difference in subs, not the difference in percentage of subs. 30% of 12m is 3.6m, thats how many people in nsw and qld are predicted to have foxtel. If 20% of 12mil in the other states have fox thats a population of 2.4mil.

How many more percentage is 3.6m compared to 2.4m?

Again, still ignoring how high a Saturday non split AFL game on FTA featuring the giants rated.


pussycat
Coach
Coach
Posts: 6632
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
Team: The Shanghai Sharks
Location: far away
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by pussycat »

:shock: You keep repeating that as though it means something. You haven't a clue how many people with PTV didn't watch the Canberra match .

And the fact that you would even contemplate for a minute that the NRL have twice the subscribers says it all. [-(


Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport! :cheers:

"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
User avatar
leeroy*NRL*
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5177
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 2:54 pm
Team: St George Illawarra Dragons
Location:
Has liked: 140 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by leeroy*NRL* »

lol twice the subscriptions


Terry
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3707
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:19 pm
Team: Wests Tigers
Location:
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by Terry »

Beaussie wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 11:00 am
Terry wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 1:23 pm As stated by SMH AFL reporter Vince Rugari, "The AFL must be concerned that the supposedrapid growth of the game in NSW is not being borne out in the stands". He could also add in the Sydney TV ratings. It appears Dr Lawson was right. The AFL basically tell lies to try and sell the game. Unfortunately for them people in the educated northern states aren't bubble dwelling idiots!!!
Noticed that Vince Rugari couldn’t bring himself to report today in the SMH the positive news regarding the 15th place Swans drawing their biggest crowd of season 2019 at the SCG yesterday. Not one mention of the crowd in his articles today despite its significance. Reporting that fact does not fit with his AFL doom and gloom in NSW agenda I guess. :roll:

Vince reminds me of you Terry with his selective reporting of facts and a focus on negatives. Shithouse sports journalist in my opinion.
Hahaha!!!! Sports journalist reports the truth!!!!! Beatup says he's a shithouse sports journalist because..... he reports the truth....................... about AFL!!!!!!

What else ya got beatup?? "Goodes doco is all lies" lololololololol. "AFL fan violence is a ..........ummmmm.......beatup by a shithouse journalist" lolololololol. First class rolled gold dill!!!!!


notaleaguefan
Banned
Posts: 2246
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:56 pm
Team: AFL
Location: QLD
Has liked: 54 times
Been liked: 25 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by notaleaguefan »

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 12:35 pm lol twice the subscriptions
got any proof of this as the afl fox footy regularly beats the NRLOL shows on fox

in the past league may have had twice the subscriptions, due to exclusively being on fox and your owner is the owner of fox it self, then AFL coming on to fox far later, will have had a big change in suscriptions :thumbleft:


NlolRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 7393
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
Team: Melbourne Demons
Location:
Has liked: 51 times
Been liked: 135 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by NlolRL »

pussycat wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 12:05 pm :shock: You keep repeating that as though it means something. You haven't a clue how many people with PTV didn't watch the Canberra match .

And the fact that you would even contemplate for a minute that the NRL have twice the subscribers says it all. [-(
my god you're thick. I never said twice the subscriptions at all #-o
leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 12:35 pm lol twice the subscriptions
lol indeed, thats not even close to what I said. You're approaching his level


pussycat
Coach
Coach
Posts: 6632
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
Team: The Shanghai Sharks
Location: far away
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by pussycat »

What you said is that the NRL had a 50% advantage when it comes to subscriptions. Even when it was pointed out to you it was more like 10% or even less! And any advantage they do have is due to higher interest levels.
Last edited by pussycat on Mon Jun 10, 2019 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.


Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport! :cheers:

"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
NlolRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 7393
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
Team: Melbourne Demons
Location:
Has liked: 51 times
Been liked: 135 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by NlolRL »

pussycat wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 3:49 pm What you said is that the NRL had a 50% advantage when it comes to subscriptions. Even when it was pointed out to you it was 10% or even less! And any advantage they do have is due to higher interest levels.
1. 100% of the population have access to FTA TV and the AFL are clearly ahead on FTA. This shows greater levels of interest. Foxtel ratings are influenced by subscription rates because only subscribers can watch.

2. 30% sub rate is 50% more than 20% sub rate.
1 and a half apples is 50% more than one apple.
$1.50 is 50% more than $1.
1.5mil people is 50% more than 1 mil people.
150 cms is 50% taller or longer than 100cms

Do you get the grade 1 maths yet?


pussycat
Coach
Coach
Posts: 6632
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
Team: The Shanghai Sharks
Location: far away
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by pussycat »

NlolRL wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 3:58 pm
pussycat wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 3:49 pm What you said is that the NRL had a 50% advantage when it comes to subscriptions. Even when it was pointed out to you it was 10% or even less! And any advantage they do have is due to higher interest levels.
1. 100% of the population have access to FTA TV and the AFL are clearly ahead on FTA. This shows greater levels of interest. Foxtel ratings are influenced by subscription rates because only subscribers can watch.

2. 30% sub rate is 50% more than 20% sub rate.
1 and a half apples is 50% more than one apple.
$1.50 is 50% more than $1.
1.5mil people is 50% more than 1 mil people.
150 cms is 50% taller or longer than 100cms

Do you get the grade 1 maths yet?

Only a limited number of games are shown on FTA. So less subscriptions means less interest.

What does the PTV % for Canberra on Friday night have to with anything professor? Yes, 30% of the ratings in that game came from PTV.

In the Richmond game 20% of the ratings come from PTV .
10% less . So What? That has nothing to do with subscription levels - absolutely nothing!



I know how to change channels professor :thumbleft:
Last edited by pussycat on Mon Jun 10, 2019 5:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.


Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport! :cheers:

"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
AFLcrap1
Coach
Coach
Posts: 18584
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:49 am
Team: The Scottish Puffins
Location:
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 45 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by AFLcrap1 »

notaleaguefan wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 12:39 pm
leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 12:35 pm lol twice the subscriptions
got any proof of this as the afl fox footy regularly beats the NRLOL shows on fox

in the past league may have had twice the subscriptions, due to exclusively being on fox and your owner is the owner of fox it self, then AFL coming on to fox far later, will have had a big change in suscriptions :thumbleft:
Lol. You asking for proof . :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ Fuck off .
You won't provide any for your claims so no RL fan has to provide anything


LIC self ownage
Lol $10 NRL tickets.$10 NRL tickets .How pathetic is that ?
Crickets chirping after I post $5 AFlol tickets .
Self ownage ..no one does it better .
AFLcrap1
Coach
Coach
Posts: 18584
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:49 am
Team: The Scottish Puffins
Location:
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 45 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by AFLcrap1 »

pussycat wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 5:31 pm
NlolRL wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 3:58 pm
pussycat wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 3:49 pm What you said is that the NRL had a 50% advantage when it comes to subscriptions. Even when it was pointed out to you it was 10% or even less! And any advantage they do have is due to higher interest levels.
1. 100% of the population have access to FTA TV and the AFL are clearly ahead on FTA. This shows greater levels of interest. Foxtel ratings are influenced by subscription rates because only subscribers can watch.

2. 30% sub rate is 50% more than 20% sub rate.
1 and a half apples is 50% more than one apple.
$1.50 is 50% more than $1.
1.5mil people is 50% more than 1 mil people.
150 cms is 50% taller or longer than 100cms

Do you get the grade 1 maths yet?

Only a limited number of games are shown on FTA. So less subscriptions means less interest.

What does the PTV % for Canberra on Friday night have to with anything professor? Yes, 30% of the ratings in that game came from PTV.

In the Richmond game 20% of the ratings come from PTV .
10% less . So What? That has nothing to do with subscription levels - absolutely nothing!



I know how to change channels professor :thumbleft:
Oh dear . Poor Vicderpians
Loler you simpleton .
If 30% of the 100% of the ratings came from PTV in a game
& 20% of the 100% of th total ratings for another game came from ptv .
The difference is 10%
I think you've failed grade 1 maths


LIC self ownage
Lol $10 NRL tickets.$10 NRL tickets .How pathetic is that ?
Crickets chirping after I post $5 AFlol tickets .
Self ownage ..no one does it better .
NlolRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 7393
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 am
Team: Melbourne Demons
Location:
Has liked: 51 times
Been liked: 135 times

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

Post by NlolRL »

pussycat wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 5:31 pm
NlolRL wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 3:58 pm
pussycat wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 3:49 pm What you said is that the NRL had a 50% advantage when it comes to subscriptions. Even when it was pointed out to you it was 10% or even less! And any advantage they do have is due to higher interest levels.
1. 100% of the population have access to FTA TV and the AFL are clearly ahead on FTA. This shows greater levels of interest. Foxtel ratings are influenced by subscription rates because only subscribers can watch.

2. 30% sub rate is 50% more than 20% sub rate.
1 and a half apples is 50% more than one apple.
$1.50 is 50% more than $1.
1.5mil people is 50% more than 1 mil people.
150 cms is 50% taller or longer than 100cms

Do you get the grade 1 maths yet?

Only a limited number of games are shown on FTA. So less subscriptions means less interest.

What does the PTV % for Canberra on Friday night have to with anything professor? Yes, 30% of the ratings in that game came from PTV.

In the Richmond game 20% of the ratings come from PTV .
10% less . So What? That has nothing to do with subscription levels - absolutely nothing!



I know how to change channels professor :thumbleft:
the afl only had 20% ptv ratings but over 250k more total viewers. This shows there was far more interest in the game overall. Therefore the fact it had less ptv ratings is ALL due to having less subscriptions, otherwise ptv would also have rated higher. It cant be any other way


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests