Fight Club - Football TV Ratings

[NlolRL]

Firstly not everyone with PTV watched this match. many don't even watch football

which applies to fans of both codes. Therefore, if there are 50% more NRL fans with subs the result will always come out about 50% more of your total. Eg: your fox figure makes up 30% of the total to our 20%

Canberra population with PTV ? Unknown!
West population with PTV ? also Unknown!
Others with PTV watching this match ? also unknown !
The Only thing known is that, in this case 30% of the people watching this match watched it on PTV.


While 20% of the people watching your game were watching on PTV . A difference (in this particular case) of 10%

irrelevant. The figures show the difference nation-wide, and have all year. The AFL have been rating around 1mil every Thurs/Fri with ratings around the low 200's.

eg. 30% ,30 apples or 30 dollars - 20 = 10.

and 10 is 50% more than 20

NRL = 80matches
Perth = 95 or 96 matches , and we both know Adelaide, Sydney, Brisbane will be similar.

I actually counted every single FTA game in Perth and there are 89 so stop bullshitting. Adelaide have 92 FTA games but 7 are delayed by between 2 and 3 hours, plus they have some games on 7mate.

The FTA advantage is simply not there, it's more BS excuses from you

Not at all Professor LOL . As I said Above Friday is not our main game.

No, it's either Thursday or Friday. They are your highest rating games every week. Our Saturday game with a small following rated higher than any NRL game this week despite you claiming the AFL only rates on Fridays (stupid logic given we also smash you on Thursdays). And this is despite Saturday rating 10% lower overall than any other day of the week.

Your excuses have been systematically destroyed, you have none left

[pussycat]

Firstly not everyone with PTV watched this match. many don't even watch football

which applies to fans of both codes. Therefore, if there are 50% more NRL fans with subs the result will always come out about 50% more of your total. Eg: your fox figure makes up 30% of the total to our 20%

Canberra population with PTV ? Unknown!
West population with PTV ? also Unknown!
Others with PTV watching this match ? also unknown !
The Only thing known is that, in this case 30% of the people watching this match watched it on PTV.


While 20% of the people watching your game were watching on PTV . A difference (in this particular case) of 10%

irrelevant. The figures show the difference nation-wide, and have all year. The AFL have been rating around 1mil every Thurs/Fri with ratings around the low 200's.

eg. 30% ,30 apples or 30 dollars - 20 = 10.

and 10 is 50% more than 20

NRL = 80matches
Perth = 95 or 96 matches , and we both know Adelaide, Sydney, Brisbane will be similar.

I actually counted every single FTA game in Perth and there are 89 so stop bullshitting. Adelaide have 92 FTA games but 7 are delayed by between 2 and 3 hours, plus they have some games on 7mate.

The FTA advantage is simply not there, it's more BS excuses from you

Not at all Professor LOL . As I said Above Friday is not our main game.

No, it's either Thursday or Friday. They are your highest rating games every week. Our Saturday game with a small following rated higher than any NRL game this week despite you claiming the AFL only rates on Fridays (stupid logic given we also smash you on Thursdays). And this is despite Saturday rating 10% lower overall than any other day of the week.

Your excuses have been systematically destroyed, you have none left

The results come out around 10% probably closer to 5%if you ha'dnt picked out one of our worst supported sides. Certainly nothing like 50% professor .

Its not irrelevant at all . There is no possible way of telling just how many didn't watch this match.

[Cats_Steve]

As stated by SMH AFL reporter Vince Rugari, "The AFL must be concerned that the supposedrapid growth of the game in NSW is not being borne out in the stands". He could also add in the Sydney TV ratings. It appears Dr Lawson was right. The AFL basically tell lies to try and sell the game. Unfortunately for them people in the educated northern states aren't bubble dwelling idiots!!!

Noticed that Vince Rugari couldn’t bring himself to report today in the SMH the positive news regarding the 15th place Swans drawing their biggest crowd of season 2019 at the SCG yesterday. Not one mention of the crowd in his articles today despite its significance. Reporting that fact does not fit with his AFL doom and gloom in NSW agenda I guess.

Vince reminds me of you Terry with his selective reporting of facts and a focus on negatives. Shithouse sports journalist in my opinion.

[NlolRL]

Firstly not everyone with PTV watched this match. many don't even watch football

which applies to fans of both codes. Therefore, if there are 50% more NRL fans with subs the result will always come out about 50% more of your total. Eg: your fox figure makes up 30% of the total to our 20%

Canberra population with PTV ? Unknown!
West population with PTV ? also Unknown!
Others with PTV watching this match ? also unknown !
The Only thing known is that, in this case 30% of the people watching this match watched it on PTV.


While 20% of the people watching your game were watching on PTV . A difference (in this particular case) of 10%

irrelevant. The figures show the difference nation-wide, and have all year. The AFL have been rating around 1mil every Thurs/Fri with ratings around the low 200's.

eg. 30% ,30 apples or 30 dollars - 20 = 10.

and 10 is 50% more than 20

NRL = 80matches
Perth = 95 or 96 matches , and we both know Adelaide, Sydney, Brisbane will be similar.

I actually counted every single FTA game in Perth and there are 89 so stop bullshitting. Adelaide have 92 FTA games but 7 are delayed by between 2 and 3 hours, plus they have some games on 7mate.

The FTA advantage is simply not there, it's more BS excuses from you

Not at all Professor LOL . As I said Above Friday is not our main game.

No, it's either Thursday or Friday. They are your highest rating games every week. Our Saturday game with a small following rated higher than any NRL game this week despite you claiming the AFL only rates on Fridays (stupid logic given we also smash you on Thursdays). And this is despite Saturday rating 10% lower overall than any other day of the week.

Your excuses have been systematically destroyed, you have none left

The results come out around 10% probably closer to 5%if you ha'dnt picked out one of our worst supported sides. Certainly nothing like 50% professor .

Its not irrelevant at all . There is no possible way of telling just how many didn't watch this match.

Fmd you're stupid. If the AFL outrate the nrl by 250k yet the nrl get 40k more on fox they obviously have far higher sub rates overall.

I am refering to the difference in subs, not the difference in percentage of subs. 30% of 12m is 3.6m, thats how many people in nsw and qld are predicted to have foxtel. If 20% of 12mil in the other states have fox thats a population of 2.4mil.

How many more percentage is 3.6m compared to 2.4m?

Again, still ignoring how high a Saturday non split AFL game on FTA featuring the giants rated.

[pussycat]

You keep repeating that as though it means something. You haven't a clue how many people with PTV didn't watch the Canberra match .

And the fact that you would even contemplate for a minute that the NRL have twice the subscribers says it all.

[leeroy*NRL*]

lol twice the subscriptions

[Terry]

As stated by SMH AFL reporter Vince Rugari, "The AFL must be concerned that the supposedrapid growth of the game in NSW is not being borne out in the stands". He could also add in the Sydney TV ratings. It appears Dr Lawson was right. The AFL basically tell lies to try and sell the game. Unfortunately for them people in the educated northern states aren't bubble dwelling idiots!!!

Noticed that Vince Rugari couldn’t bring himself to report today in the SMH the positive news regarding the 15th place Swans drawing their biggest crowd of season 2019 at the SCG yesterday. Not one mention of the crowd in his articles today despite its significance. Reporting that fact does not fit with his AFL doom and gloom in NSW agenda I guess.

Vince reminds me of you Terry with his selective reporting of facts and a focus on negatives. Shithouse sports journalist in my opinion.

Hahaha!!!! Sports journalist reports the truth!!!!! Beatup says he's a shithouse sports journalist because..... he reports the truth....................... about AFL!!!!!!

What else ya got beatup?? "Goodes doco is all lies" lololololololol. "AFL fan violence is a ..........ummmmm.......beatup by a shithouse journalist" lolololololol. First class rolled gold dill!!!!!

[notaleaguefan]

lol twice the subscriptions

got any proof of this as the afl fox footy regularly beats the NRLOL shows on fox

in the past league may have had twice the subscriptions, due to exclusively being on fox and your owner is the owner of fox it self, then AFL coming on to fox far later, will have had a big change in suscriptions

[NlolRL]

You keep repeating that as though it means something. You haven't a clue how many people with PTV didn't watch the Canberra match .

And the fact that you would even contemplate for a minute that the NRL have twice the subscribers says it all.

my god you're thick. I never said twice the subscriptions at all

lol twice the subscriptions

lol indeed, thats not even close to what I said. You're approaching his level

[pussycat]

What you said is that the NRL had a 50% advantage when it comes to subscriptions. Even when it was pointed out to you it was more like 10% or even less! And any advantage they do have is due to higher interest levels.

[NlolRL]

What you said is that the NRL had a 50% advantage when it comes to subscriptions. Even when it was pointed out to you it was 10% or even less! And any advantage they do have is due to higher interest levels.

1. 100% of the population have access to FTA TV and the AFL are clearly ahead on FTA. This shows greater levels of interest. Foxtel ratings are influenced by subscription rates because only subscribers can watch.

2. 30% sub rate is 50% more than 20% sub rate.
1 and a half apples is 50% more than one apple.
$1.50 is 50% more than $1.
1.5mil people is 50% more than 1 mil people.
150 cms is 50% taller or longer than 100cms

Do you get the grade 1 maths yet?

[pussycat]

What you said is that the NRL had a 50% advantage when it comes to subscriptions. Even when it was pointed out to you it was 10% or even less! And any advantage they do have is due to higher interest levels.

1. 100% of the population have access to FTA TV and the AFL are clearly ahead on FTA. This shows greater levels of interest. Foxtel ratings are influenced by subscription rates because only subscribers can watch.

2. 30% sub rate is 50% more than 20% sub rate.
1 and a half apples is 50% more than one apple.
$1.50 is 50% more than $1.
1.5mil people is 50% more than 1 mil people.
150 cms is 50% taller or longer than 100cms

Do you get the grade 1 maths yet?

Only a limited number of games are shown on FTA. So less subscriptions means less interest.

What does the PTV % for Canberra on Friday night have to with anything professor? Yes, 30% of the ratings in that game came from PTV.

In the Richmond game 20% of the ratings come from PTV .
10% less . So What? That has nothing to do with subscription levels - absolutely nothing!



I know how to change channels professor

[AFLcrap1]

lol twice the subscriptions

got any proof of this as the afl fox footy regularly beats the NRLOL shows on fox

in the past league may have had twice the subscriptions, due to exclusively being on fox and your owner is the owner of fox it self, then AFL coming on to fox far later, will have had a big change in suscriptions

Lol. You asking for proof . Fuck off .
You won't provide any for your claims so no RL fan has to provide anything

[AFLcrap1]

What you said is that the NRL had a 50% advantage when it comes to subscriptions. Even when it was pointed out to you it was 10% or even less! And any advantage they do have is due to higher interest levels.

1. 100% of the population have access to FTA TV and the AFL are clearly ahead on FTA. This shows greater levels of interest. Foxtel ratings are influenced by subscription rates because only subscribers can watch.

2. 30% sub rate is 50% more than 20% sub rate.
1 and a half apples is 50% more than one apple.
$1.50 is 50% more than $1.
1.5mil people is 50% more than 1 mil people.
150 cms is 50% taller or longer than 100cms

Do you get the grade 1 maths yet?

Only a limited number of games are shown on FTA. So less subscriptions means less interest.

What does the PTV % for Canberra on Friday night have to with anything professor? Yes, 30% of the ratings in that game came from PTV.

In the Richmond game 20% of the ratings come from PTV .
10% less . So What? That has nothing to do with subscription levels - absolutely nothing!



I know how to change channels professor

Oh dear . Poor Vicderpians
Loler you simpleton .
If 30% of the 100% of the ratings came from PTV in a game
& 20% of the 100% of th total ratings for another game came from ptv .
The difference is 10%
I think you've failed grade 1 maths

[NlolRL]

What you said is that the NRL had a 50% advantage when it comes to subscriptions. Even when it was pointed out to you it was 10% or even less! And any advantage they do have is due to higher interest levels.

1. 100% of the population have access to FTA TV and the AFL are clearly ahead on FTA. This shows greater levels of interest. Foxtel ratings are influenced by subscription rates because only subscribers can watch.

2. 30% sub rate is 50% more than 20% sub rate.
1 and a half apples is 50% more than one apple.
$1.50 is 50% more than $1.
1.5mil people is 50% more than 1 mil people.
150 cms is 50% taller or longer than 100cms

Do you get the grade 1 maths yet?

Only a limited number of games are shown on FTA. So less subscriptions means less interest.

What does the PTV % for Canberra on Friday night have to with anything professor? Yes, 30% of the ratings in that game came from PTV.

In the Richmond game 20% of the ratings come from PTV .
10% less . So What? That has nothing to do with subscription levels - absolutely nothing!



I know how to change channels professor

the afl only had 20% ptv ratings but over 250k more total viewers. This shows there was far more interest in the game overall. Therefore the fact it had less ptv ratings is ALL due to having less subscriptions, otherwise ptv would also have rated higher. It cant be any other way