NlolRL wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2019 6:46 pm
Terry wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2019 5:32 pm
Wrong as usual. It comes down to raw numbers.
according to who, RL fans?
Again, show me another organisation in the world that compares cumulative ratings for different programs
I've done this before pal. This is what makes this site so tiresome to intelligent posters. It's the same arguments over and over and over again. We hammer you with facts, figures, statistics and evidence. You come back with the same base level idiocy time and time and time again. You know.......like.......back into the goldfish bowl we go!!!!!
Every sporting competition and broadcaster in the world have a microscopic examination of tv ratings. Per game. Per round. Per season. Aggregates. Averages. Every part of the ratings is sliced and diced and dissected. Different programs and different sports are continually compared. You know......like......the media organisations that put out the ratings every day. It's a comparison pal!!!!!!!!!
And you know why they do it???? No ya wouldn't because you're a dill. They do it because that's how they make their money. You know.....like .......if the NFL rates higher than MLB they get more money. And how do they do that I hear you not ask???? They compare the ratings. Per game. Per round. Per season. Aggregates. Averages. Every part of it.
So there you have it............again........after the last time......and the time before that....... etc etc etc....!!!!!!
I won't be answering this dull-witted question again.
By the way: has your village found you yet...........idiot!!!!!!!!!!