When you get over 1.2mil rating and 85k at a home and away game come back to mepussycat wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:46 amThe same old shit pile in the end though - followed by a silver medal presentation![]()

When you get over 1.2mil rating and 85k at a home and away game come back to mepussycat wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:46 amThe same old shit pile in the end though - followed by a silver medal presentation![]()
In your little world pissy catpussycat wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:46 amThe same old shit pile in the end though - followed by a silver medal presentation![]()
But nrlol is more popular and most watched is the usual cry from you loons
SportCapital wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2019 9:39 amCrap, that's not reality.
Please, prove the Oztam extrapolation is real.
Reality is, all those "viewers" for the year is really about 40000 logs on oztam box's from a national panel of 8500.
It's that not the reality of it crap?
which is funny because when you make claims they always lack proof....pussycat wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:24 amSportCapital wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2019 9:39 amCrap, that's not reality.
Please, prove the Oztam extrapolation is real.
Reality is, all those "viewers" for the year is really about 40000 logs on oztam box's from a national panel of 8500.
It's that not the reality of it crap?
Typical, Lone voice in the jungle. Proof , Proof, Proof. Did you pick that up from Lol ? When faced with reality he usually asks for proof.
The sun come up in the East this morning![]()
![]()
prove it. Ooh its hot ...Prove it
![]()
So, no. There's no actual proof.AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:23 amMedia companies outlay billions $$$$ on these rating results so yeh that's enough for me .
Poor sporty ...but but but but but
NlolRL wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2019 11:13 amwhich is funny because when you make claims they always lack proof....pussycat wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:24 amSportCapital wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2019 9:39 amCrap, that's not reality.
Please, prove the Oztam extrapolation is real.
Reality is, all those "viewers" for the year is really about 40000 logs on oztam box's from a national panel of 8500.
It's that not the reality of it crap?
Typical, Lone voice in the jungle. Proof , Proof, Proof. Did you pick that up from Lol ? When faced with reality he usually asks for proof.
The sun come up in the East this morning![]()
![]()
prove it. Ooh its hot ...Prove it
![]()
![]()
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
I haven’t been following this discussion but are you actually trying to suggest there’s little statistical significance in the OzTAM box ratings?SportCapital wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2019 11:42 am
So, no. There's no actual proof.AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:23 amMedia companies outlay billions $$$$ on these rating results so yeh that's enough for me .
Poor sporty ...but but but but but
But when you break it down further.
The reality of it is even less convincing as a credible source due to its inherent margin for error.
This is the reality crap.
Of a million "views" for a night it's really about 330 logs on an Oztam box.
So of the 8500 national panel 330 tuned in to the NRL for the night.
I'm going to say it's probably those same 330 or there abouts tuning in to the NRL most of the time.
All year.
I truely pity you lot, having to hang your hat on the viewing habits of a few hundred households.
So, moving forward, I'm very happy to continue to remind everyone here the reality.
Hope you don't mind.
After all, it's the truth of the matter crap. Is it not?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Dad was an Eskimo and Mum was a fluffy rabbitKing-Eliagh wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2019 12:28 pmNlolRL wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2019 11:13 amwhich is funny because when you make claims they always lack proof....pussycat wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:24 am
Typical, Lone voice in the jungle. Proof , Proof, Proof. Did you pick that up from Lol ? When faced with reality he usually asks for proof.
The sun come up in the East this morning![]()
![]()
prove it. Ooh its hot ...Prove it
![]()
![]()
hey rat boy. You found out who tamblings parents are yet?
![]()
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot] and 4 guests