The_Wookie wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2019 12:18 pmDid you also note that it was a one off comment made by one ma. In 2012.
Noted again, for the next time league folks here bitch about people reaching back for material on crowd fudging.
He didnt encourage them. He doesnt have an issue with them as a valid tool. For that matter neither does the law of the land.And I couldn't find any other codes that encourages pay offs and cover ups.
Two firsts for the AFL and well done LOL gold and more gold.
And Bullshit. You cant find any instances where an out of court settlement was paid to anyone anywhere? search better.
Being a highly controversial/embarrassing and unspoken law I don't think to many people will be owning up!
though I did manage to find this in the age:
"AT LEAST one AFL club recruiter has privately admitted to the league that he and his club would be unlikely to draft an indigenous player unless at least one parent were white. ... "
A codes that encourages pay offs is totally different to what you said!
'A valid tool' is nothing more then Gilligan trying to cover his arse by using some gobbldy gook language.