Still can’t acknowledge it was a good night for the AFL, broadcasters and sponsors can you?AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:10 pmSee how it goes up against another popular sport
It had clear air on FTA.

Still can’t acknowledge it was a good night for the AFL, broadcasters and sponsors can you?AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:10 pmSee how it goes up against another popular sport
It had clear air on FTA.
No, perth is our second largest market like Brisbane is yoursAFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 12:32 amLol
That's one states ratings .
You're carrying on like alevery state had it broadcast at 4.
yes, but how much would it really have rated extra if it were at 7pm...NlolRL wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:32 amNo, perth is our second largest market like Brisbane is yours
it only rated about 20k. It could have been 50k moreleeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:52 amyes, but how much would it really have rated extra if it were at 7pm...
ADELAIDE rated 66k
now for AFL ratings they are usally neck and neck.. (lets just say it rated 80k)
does this help your cause..
yes i know it only rated 20k....NlolRL wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:57 amit only rated about 20k. It could have been 50k moreleeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:52 amyes, but how much would it really have rated extra if it were at 7pm...NlolRL wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:32 am
No, perth is our second largest market like Brisbane is yours
ADELAIDE rated 66k
now for AFL ratings they are usally neck and neck.. (lets just say it rated 80k)
does this help your cause..
It lost marginally but would have rated around 60k more if it was prime time nation-wide.leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 11:01 amyes i know it only rated 20k....NlolRL wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:57 amit only rated about 20k. It could have been 50k moreleeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:52 am
yes, but how much would it really have rated extra if it were at 7pm...
ADELAIDE rated 66k
now for AFL ratings they are usally neck and neck.. (lets just say it rated 80k)
does this help your cause..
i even gave you the benefit of the doubt that it could of rated as high as 80k...
my point is.. what are you trying to proove..
even if it did rate 30k more as you have stated .. what does this do?
Fair Enough, Popularity of a product is seen after numerous games...NlolRL wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 11:12 amIt lost marginally but would have rated around 60k more if it was prime time nation-wide.leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 11:01 amyes i know it only rated 20k....
i even gave you the benefit of the doubt that it could of rated as high as 80k...
my point is.. what are you trying to proove..
even if it did rate 30k more as you have stated .. what does this do?
However, I'm not trying to say AFLx is popular, it's just more popular than the RL folk on here will want to admit