King-Eliagh wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:06 am
SportCapital wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:24 am
King-Eliagh wrote: Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:49 pm
Sport capital wrote
“Could be a master stroke from the AFL and another nail in the coffin's for "challenging" leagues.”
Is that misquoting you sport me poor dear?
Do yo understand what we find hilarious about it?
No, it's just out of context now.
...
All the members and I'm sure the guests would appreciate if you'd cut the misquoting out of context from your limited Arsenal.
It's really lame.
Cut the misquoting...Out of context now?

errrm sport ol chap? Were you all there when you wrote this?
I didn’t put any context in my post. I just quoted your exact words, which continue to be absolutely hilarious!
Do you understand yet? You thought aflx in it’s original format could be a ‘masterstroke’ by the AFL

just admit it and stop trying to squirm away from your statement. Own it man, you’ll feel better
You sneaky fucker!
You edited my post to suit your dismal, piss poor lie of an argument.
Members and guests, have a look at lengths KE will stoop to, just to back up his lies.
He edited this out because it clearly states the context:
"So for the members and guests here's the context.
My post prior to the first game last year....
"But as a whole I have a feeling this format is aimed at the participation market. Mid week comps across the nation. With only the ultra fit really being able to run for 2 hours this will bring all those that only have 30 minutes of run time in them to the game.
Could be a master stroke from the AFL and another nail in the coffin's for "challenging" leagues."
So, in less words.
Aiming AFLX at the participation market could be a masterstroke from the AFL.
I stand by what I said. Only time will prove it.
All clear now ke?"
I still stand by it, own it, what ever the fuck else.
That's exactly what I said.
Comprende you sneaky fucker?