

Riveting stuff

Seriously how mundane has the AFL finals series. Has there been even one game that’s gone down to the last few mins?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Yes the series on the whole has been disappointing in this regard, absolutely.King-Eliagh wrote: Sat Sep 22, 2018 4:18 pmStevie, please you don’t need to fake it bro. The result was clear very early in the game and four goals is a mammoth lead with less than a quarter of footy to play. Anyone who’s played and observed the game for years like myself knows that.
Let me be clear the storm game last night was just as shite. But the big diff is almost every single AFL final has not been close at all. Just like last year. Whilst the nrl has had around 50percent of its finals absolute down to the wire thrillers, just like last year.
It’s chalk and cheese Stevie boy.![]()
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Cats_Steve wrote: Sat Sep 22, 2018 1:52 pmYou reckon a 3 try differential in a game where I'm assuming 5 tries were scored is closer?
4 goals being a margain which can be easilly retrieved.
It was fantastic to see some Tigs fans put back in their place.Bbear wrote: Sat Sep 22, 2018 10:57 pmI don't like Richmond so for me I enjoyed watching the best team all year get a thorough black and blue ( white) beating. To see a group of cocky arrogant players fail when it matters was not to miss.
The game play was quite fast and ferocious, of a high standard despite the scoreline suggesting otherwise. The game was worth watching hope you all enjoyed it. Waited up till midnight for coach interviews to see what Damien hardwick offered as an excuse for this debacle, he said it is what it is and the sun will still rise in the morning.
What else could you say ?
What a shit, disappointing match.King-Eliagh wrote: Sat Sep 22, 2018 4:59 pmMeanwhile as I speak after a quarter of AFL final footy, all and sundry, cept those with shitfobrains, know west coast have beaten tanksters melb.
The commentators said at half time “no one could’ve picked melbourne to be goalless at half time... it’s been more than 90 years since a finals team has done a whole half of footy without a goal”
Well folks. I’m here to tell you all. Ol KE coulda picked Melbs to go scoreless for a full half. Heck I wouldn’t be surprised if they don’t kick a goal for the rest of the matchit’s not surprising given the way the AFL is becoming more and more lopsided, not surprising at all.
Cats_Steve wrote: Sun Sep 23, 2018 7:49 amIt was fantastic to see some Tigs fans put back in their place.Bbear wrote: Sat Sep 22, 2018 10:57 pmI don't like Richmond so for me I enjoyed watching the best team all year get a thorough black and blue ( white) beating. To see a group of cocky arrogant players fail when it matters was not to miss.
The game play was quite fast and ferocious, of a high standard despite the scoreline suggesting otherwise. The game was worth watching hope you all enjoyed it. Waited up till midnight for coach interviews to see what Damien hardwick offered as an excuse for this debacle, he said it is what it is and the sun will still rise in the morning.
What else could you say ?
There seems to be a disconnect in here between needing to be within a couple of goals in the last few mins to make it as close as a game of RL is when it's a try or even 2 in the last few mins.
Does this make every game of soccer within a goal or 2 at the end "a far tighter finish" too, when the scoring isn't relative at all?
Cheers, silly of me to suggest Soccer wasn't the most popular sport in the world like that.I guess it must. There the most popular game in the world, Not the most popular game in Victoria.
Just not trueActually, you guys said it wright there! Both more concerned about the coaches reaction and other things than the actual game.
Cats_Steve wrote: Sun Sep 23, 2018 7:59 amWhat a shit, disappointing match.King-Eliagh wrote: Sat Sep 22, 2018 4:59 pmMeanwhile as I speak after a quarter of AFL final footy, all and sundry, cept those with shitfobrains, know west coast have beaten tanksters melb.
The commentators said at half time “no one could’ve picked melbourne to be goalless at half time... it’s been more than 90 years since a finals team has done a whole half of footy without a goal”
Well folks. I’m here to tell you all. Ol KE coulda picked Melbs to go scoreless for a full half. Heck I wouldn’t be surprised if they don’t kick a goal for the rest of the matchit’s not surprising given the way the AFL is becoming more and more lopsided, not surprising at all.
How would you have picked Melb to go in goal less at halftime? Would you have based it on the fact that Melbourne beat them in Perth only a month ago?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], azif, Bing [Bot] and 6 guests