Ummmmm pal, you might have to use some common sense here. Are you capable of that??? They listed their 'top regions'. Meaning they are the areas that have the most 'members' in the state. The lowest of the 'top regions' had just over 400 'members'. That means any other region had less than that.SportCapital wrote: Fri Jul 27, 2018 8:37 pmNSW population is 7.544mTerry wrote: Fri Jul 27, 2018 4:20 pmWell the Giants are, incredibly, up to it again!!!!!!!! Today they announced they have 25k 'members'. And once again they put out a graph to show where their 'members' are. And once again the graph tells the lie of their own claim lololololol!!!!!!
https://twitter.com/GWSGIANTS
So this year they state they have 4.7k 'members' in their top regions in NSW but 70.95% of members in NSW in total. They also claim 19.5% are in the ACT and 9.25% in other states. The total for their top NSW regions and the ACT and other states is 11.7k 'members'. So this year there is a black hole of 13,300 'members'.
Where are these 'members'? Who are they? If the top regions in NSW come to only 4.7k how can the rest of NSW possibly have 13.3k??????? This is just bald faced lying. How the hell someone in the media doesn't pick this up is beyond me. Dr Goebbels would be proud of these numbers!!!!!!
The top regions have 1.329m for 4.7k members at 0.35%.
That leaves 6.215m to account for the 13.3k balance at 0.21%
Sounds reasonable.
"Black hole"......... Where?
So they have actually shown where less than half of their 'members' live. And that is in regions where they are most 'popular'. So they are asking people to believe they have more 'members' in less popular regions than in their top regions. And massively so!!!!!!! Can you see something not quite right here???? Something that doesn't add up????? Anything that just doesn't make sense????????
Don't answer too quickly pal lest you make yourself look a tad ummmmm.......silly lololol!!!!!!