pussycat wrote: ↑Sun Apr 22, 2018 11:59 am
Congradulations, You've finally proven that your overlap theory is shit!
Your 2 Saturday night matches one involving Geelong(a Friday night team) and Freemantle (a non Friday night team)
Your High rating team 235k , Your side that doesn't rate 91k
And if you want to compare games. Our opening match was a very ordinary affair but still got as many as your draw. and in the middle games, our last 3 years wooden spooner ran out comfortable winners.
FMD youre a dickhead. You've used two games shown concurrently to prove my overlap theory is shit??
They were shown concurrently you moron! Neutral viewers had 2 choices, watch Geelong v Port, which was 5th v 7th, or watch 9th v 16th. Obviously neutrals watched the better match! Fact is there were more people watching the AFL on STV than the NRL at 8pm last night, despite the fact the AFL was also on FTA.
Then we have the real story of the day with the 2 Saturday afternoon AFL games shown in isolation which rated comparably to the NRL's games despite the AFL starting at 1.30pm, and also being shown on FTA to Perth. Question, did these 2 AFL games rate far higher on STV than our typical afternoon games? The answer of course is YES. The reason IS NOT because they were better matchups, because saints are a small Melbourne club, and the giants are even smaller. The Blues are a poor performing Melbourne club, and the Eagles saw the game in the early afternoon on FTA. And talking about wooden spooners, the Saints and Blues have been shit on field for years.
Yesterday proves my 'theory' (which is just fact, no theory about it) is correct. How you can try to argue otherwise is ridiculous