Re: 2017 - AFL / AFLW - Australian Football TV Ratings

[NlolRL]

You have more games
MOre games on FTA .

here we go again! More games or targeted games means nothing if you play them all at the same time. How are you too stupid to understand this?

The ONLY way to truly compare the codes is when 1 game is played directly against 1 game, and we won this comparison 34 - 4! That's 34 - 4!! All other stats are irrelevant when you are flogged so comprehensively under basically the same conditions

[pussycat]

Lol, in 2012,13,14,15,16,17over 1000 games were played, over 85% were played of those back to back and the result

[NlolRL]

Lol, in 2012,13,14,15,16,17over 1000 games were played, over 85% were played of those back to back and the result

and in English?

[pussycat]

In what ever language you like. It doesn't matter, the results wont change

[pussycat]

In what ever language you like. It doesn't matter, the results wont change

[leeroy*NRL*]

we can argue or we want..

but the AFL a Billion Dollar organization>

Planned with the networks and sold the rights to the highest bidder>>

and the outcome was the AFL Schedule

it achieved the best known possible way of making the most Tv figures to generate the most money $$

END OF>>

[AFLcrap1]

we can argue or we want..

but the AFL a Billion Dollar organization>

Planned with the networks and sold the rights to the highest bidder>>

and the outcome was the AFL Schedule

it achieved the best known possible way of making the most Tv figures to generate the most money $$

END OF>>

Excatly .
& still gets beaten by RL with less FTA games.

[NlolRL]

we can argue or we want..

but the AFL a Billion Dollar organization>

Planned with the networks and sold the rights to the highest bidder>>

and the outcome was the AFL Schedule

it achieved the best known possible way of making the most Tv figures to generate the most money $$

END OF>>

which is why total ratings are irrelevant. Single game v game shows the market

[AFLcrap1]

That's your opinion